5D admirers, assemble!

A couple from Rocky Mountain National Park...

Boardwalk at the Beaver Pond (w/ 17-40mm)

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

Nice Jay. Any way to increase the contrast in the second one? Love the first, with the leading lines...and the people make the shot!

inthedeck wrote in post #6313371
Nice Jay. Any way to increase the contrast in the second one? Love the first, with the leading lines...and the people make the shot!

Thanks!

I need to let the sRGB conversions sink in then I'm sure I'll end up going back and tweaking some images.

I kept losing the forrests to the shadow areas so I was hesitant to crank the contrast too much in some of them.

It wasn't actually hazy there that day but the quality of light was very, well, light and airy.

Gotcha, makes sense. Still nice, nonetheless.

Taken with the 70-200 f/2.8 No IS

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Incredible shot, TheAztech... I can never seem to get shots as tack sharp and crisp like that... I think I need to break down and start using flash of some sort instead of always going with natural light.
Plus, my 5D Mark II (or whatever it'll be called) should help out

Very nice image, The Aztech. Very well done.

TheAztech wrote in post #6316124
Taken with the 70-200 f/2.8 No IS

Beautiful...

You're truly one of the high-end fashion/portrait folks here at POTN.

I think the 'only' thing I don't like about it, is the lines, in the bg. Just a little weird, to me. Other than that, love the tones in the shot. How much time do you spend PP'ing these images?

inthedeck wrote in post #6318471
I think the 'only' thing I don't like about it, is the lines, in the bg. Just a little weird, to me. Other than that, love the tones in the shot. How much time do you spend PP these images?

prolly 15 mins....I removed skin blemishes , convert to BW, some contrast, levels and done..

The background is some sort of snake skin..thats why

TheAztech wrote in post #6316124
Taken with the 70-200 f/2.8 No IS

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

very very nice. any reason for your choice of iso50? just curious

Sfordphoto wrote in post #6318519
very very nice. any reason for your choice of iso50? just curious

Despite I'm aware I loose dynamic range, I rather to have noise-less imagines....I like'em very very clean.

Care to take a stab at LeAndra in this post --> Click Here.

I'd like some more feedback, since the G&N forum is so uptight...hehe. Thanks. PM me, if that's easier.

inthedeck wrote in post #6318565
Care to take a stab at LeAndra in this post --> Click Here.

I'd like some more feedback, since the G&N forum is so uptight...hehe. Thanks. PM me, if that's easier.

I pm'ed ya...

Thx.