Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 02 Mar 2008 (Sunday) 20:26
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Borders: Yay or Nay?"
Yes, I put borders on all of my final images.
5
17.2%
No, I don't use borders at all.
12
41.4%
Whatever makes the photo look good.
12
41.4%

29 voters, 29 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Borders: Yay or Nay?

 
woloi
Senior Member
262 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Boston, MA (FINALLY!)
     
Mar 02, 2008 20:26 |  #1

So I'm slowly learning more and more about this "post processing" thing, and one thing I've seen come up a lot is the use, or lack of use, of borders around images. To keep things simple, I'm talking about a simple black border, or if we want to get fancy, a white inner/black outer border, along with a watermark & perhaps image title in the border.

My question is, what do you guys think is "better" to show off your photos? This is entirely subjective, but I'm going to ask that you refrain from "because it looks better." I want to know why it looks better.

I'm doing some work with ImageMagick and LightRoom and scripting and all sorts of craziness, and I realized it'd be quite trivial to add borders to my workflow...but I'm not really sold either way on them yet. The only advantage I've found is it makes it very simple to batch watermark my photos without worrying about the watermark completely ruining the photo.


Canon 400D
Sigma 20mm f/1.8 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 | Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon EFS 10-22 f/3.5-4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.E.V.
/Include subdirectories, empty directories, and verify.
Avatar
3,866 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Agoura Hills, CA
     
Mar 02, 2008 21:52 |  #2

I said whatever makes the photo look good. I put borders on some not all of my images. I guess for posting on the forums yes, large prints or prints maybe.


ShotsInTime (external link) / Gear List /Flickr (external link) / Canon Family Portrait (external link)
- Don't Argue With A Stupid Person, They Will Bring You Down To Their Level And Beat You With Experience.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 02, 2008 21:52 |  #3

No; makes extra work in post and the image should stand on its own.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woloi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
262 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Boston, MA (FINALLY!)
     
Mar 02, 2008 22:40 |  #4

cdifoto wrote in post #5036657 (external link)
No; makes extra work in post and the image should stand on its own.

The reason I asked this question is because I'm at a point where I could very easily put borders into my workflow, meaning that there would be no additional work beyond checking "Add borders", unless you're counting how many clock cycles are used to process the picture ;).

As far as having an image stand on it's own, does a simple black border really make that much of a difference in how you see an image? I understand in print it could, hence fancy framing and matting, but when viewing on a computer screen do the same factors apply?


Canon 400D
Sigma 20mm f/1.8 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 | Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon EFS 10-22 f/3.5-4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 02, 2008 22:45 |  #5

If it's a simple border that doesn't distract, it doesn't affect me in any way and is unnecessary. If it's a fancy border that either impresses me or makes me think it's ugly, it's distracting and unnecessary.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Mar 02, 2008 23:01 |  #6

I have no rules that apply to every image every time. Call me a free spirit.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Mar 03, 2008 01:45 |  #7

Depends on the image usage.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,246 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Borders: Yay or Nay?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is sinonaut
924 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.