Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Oct 2004 (Monday) 15:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rain covers, do you use them?

 
sGu
Goldmember
Avatar
2,372 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Oct 25, 2004 15:27 |  #1

I'm thinking about getting rain covers for my gear(it rains too much here in Manchester), and I've found following ones are reasonably priced.

Kata raincover, however it doesn't have a hole for lens(pretty weird for camera rain cover).

Lightware raincover, I think this is by far the best option, one for all solution, cover from 70-200mm to 600mm, for $30.

Tenba raincover, I've used it with 400mm, pretty neat, but you pay for different ones to go with different lens, from 9' to 24', $40 each.

Aquatech, well, it's just too pricy for me.

Are there other ones that you would recommend? So far, lightware seems to be the one for me.

Here is a link (external link) for lightware and tenba ones.


Beautifully Ordinary | Gu Photography | Still + Motion Pictures
w. guphoto.co.uk
e gu@guphoto.co.uk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Molydood
Senior Member
603 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Essex, UK
     
Oct 25, 2004 15:44 |  #2

seems to me like a plastic bag will do a similar job, but its a damn good idea. My camera got a little dripped on the other day, and it felt very wrong!

Sorry I don't have any advice about your choice however :oops:


My real name is Martin
20D (FS 300D), fifty, 18-55, 70-200 f4, tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sGu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,372 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Oct 25, 2004 15:53 |  #3

It just feels wrong not to protect the gear you spent thousands on, even though I know my 1D + 70-200mm is weather proof(which i did shoot in the pouring rain once), it still hurts at bottom of my heart when you see those rain drops land on them ...


Beautifully Ordinary | Gu Photography | Still + Motion Pictures
w. guphoto.co.uk
e gu@guphoto.co.uk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hugewally
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 25, 2004 16:00 |  #4

After spending $$$$ on camera gear, why skimp on rain covers? Protect your investment with the best your can afford... I went with Aquatech and haven't looked back once...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Molydood
Senior Member
603 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Essex, UK
     
Oct 25, 2004 16:09 |  #5

you are of course both correct :)


My real name is Martin
20D (FS 300D), fifty, 18-55, 70-200 f4, tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sGu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,372 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Oct 25, 2004 16:30 |  #6

Hugewally wrote:
After spending $$$$ on camera gear, why skimp on rain covers? Protect your investment with the best your can afford... I went with Aquatech and haven't looked back once...

emm...Aquatech, the most expensive rain cover I've ever found ... it's definitely out of my budget for raincovers, I'm gonna be buying two for both cameras with lens mounted, might just go with two lightware ones.


Beautifully Ordinary | Gu Photography | Still + Motion Pictures
w. guphoto.co.uk
e gu@guphoto.co.uk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoachP8
Member
30 posts
Joined Mar 2003
     
Oct 25, 2004 17:46 |  #7

Rain Covers - Improv?

I shoot soccer in Southern California. 30,000 shots in 2003! We only get about 20 inches of rain a year. But as soccer fans well know, its "play-on" under full conditions.

I cut the arms off an old gore-tex mountain jacket. I velcro the wrist end to 70-200 and 400mm sun shades and drape the shoulder ends over my Mk2 and 10d. The AF works without interference. A little scotch guard before use keeps the material nearly waterproof. (Note: some downpours are too dangerous to my equipment to carry on... with this rig. I carry a plastic garbage bag for when I must surrender.)

Does anyone use neopreme for lenes mated to a camera body "glove?"
I've have a home made version for my little Rollei B35. The 5/16 neopreme has kept it dry and dent free since the early 70's. I also velcro it onto a ski pole or ice ax as my monopod.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoachP8
Member
30 posts
Joined Mar 2003
     
Oct 26, 2004 09:40 |  #8

AquaTech for my MK2

A little research indicates this is a good insurance buy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DeeplyDigital
Senior Member
Avatar
270 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Dublino - IE
     
Oct 27, 2004 03:37 |  #9

CoachP8 wrote:
I shoot soccer in Southern California. 30,000 shots in 2003! We only get about 20 inches of rain a year. But as soccer fans well know, its "play-on" under full conditions.

I cut the arms off an old gore-tex mountain jacket. I velcro the wrist end to 70-200 and 400mm sun shades and drape the shoulder ends over my Mk2 and 10d. The AF works without interference. A little scotch guard before use keeps the material nearly waterproof. (Note: some downpours are too dangerous to my equipment to carry on... with this rig. I carry a plastic garbage bag for when I must surrender.)

Does anyone use neopreme for lenes mated to a camera body "glove?"
I've have a home made version for my little Rollei B35. The 5/16 neopreme has kept it dry and dent free since the early 70's. I also velcro it onto a ski pole or ice ax as my monopod.


I want to do a few shots in the rain, but not that
many that it would be worth it spending hundreds of €.

Could you post a pic of your homemade raingear?

We have a big storm coming today, I want raingear now...

-




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sGu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,372 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Oct 27, 2004 06:47 |  #10

Search lightware on B&H, they only cost $29.95, and it covers from 300mm to 600mm; or, try Penn Camera, search for either Tenba or Photo-fax, they are a bit more expensive, however, a LOT cheaper than Aquatech.


Beautifully Ordinary | Gu Photography | Still + Motion Pictures
w. guphoto.co.uk
e gu@guphoto.co.uk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tiger1
Senior Member
Avatar
273 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Tierra Verde, Fl. USA
     
Oct 27, 2004 07:19 |  #11

:D sGu,

You could move to Florida where the :D shines all the time - you won't need rain gear -HA :lol:

Gene


Gene
Artist/Photographer/Ar​chitect
1DsMkII, 7D, 10d, SD950IS and - "Oh Yeah" "L" Glass 100-400L, 17-40L www.generizzo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sGu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,372 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Oct 27, 2004 07:34 |  #12

I wish I could ... but unfortunately it's not up to me to decide those things :(

And getting some rain cover would be more practical for now :D


Beautifully Ordinary | Gu Photography | Still + Motion Pictures
w. guphoto.co.uk
e gu@guphoto.co.uk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cardigan1979
Member
79 posts
Joined Jan 2003
     
Oct 27, 2004 15:08 |  #13

S Gu. I was at a football match last weekend where it persistantly rained. I used a thick plastic bag with a elastic band over my lens cover it covered both lens and body. But also I wear a large rimmed 'cowboy' type hat that covers the lens + body as well. Good price as well.

I did have to buy new waterproof bottoms as the ones I worn turn out to leak very badly though!!

Isn't it just fun !!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoachP8
Member
30 posts
Joined Mar 2003
     
Oct 27, 2004 18:36 |  #14

AquaTech for my MK2

The SportShield 300 is tight on my Mk2 and 400mm. In addition, to the camera cover you have to buy, 1 of 3, eyepieces to mate with the view/opening in the camera cover.

Aquatech is priced seriously high but probably is justified. The design is truly edgy and efficient. Competitors will quickly ripped it off. Then, the price will settledown.

The dollar ain't worth what is used to be... The US $ versus the EU $ is 1.26 US::1.00 EU.

Always carry a large thick garbage bag and gaffer tape (better than duct) - no residue.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sGu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,372 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Oct 27, 2004 19:34 |  #15

CoachP8 wrote:
The SportShield 300 is tight on my Mk2 and 400mm. In addition, to the camera cover you have to buy, 1 of 3, eyepieces to mate with the view/opening in the camera cover.

Aquatech is priced seriously high but probably is justified. The design is truly edgy and efficient. Competitors will quickly ripped it off. Then, the price will settledown.

The dollar ain't worth what is used to be... The US $ versus the EU $ is 1.26 US::1.00 EU.

Always carry a large thick garbage bag and gaffer tape (better than duct) - no residue.

Thanks for the advice, when I looked up photo-fax ones, they do have view/opening and eyepiece to fit specific cameras(nikon and Canon).

Aquatech is probably the best out there, and can justify its cost, but for now, I'd rather go with something cheaper.


Beautifully Ordinary | Gu Photography | Still + Motion Pictures
w. guphoto.co.uk
e gu@guphoto.co.uk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,907 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Rain covers, do you use them?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1696 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.