Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Mar 2008 (Monday) 13:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Body Color

 
Hland
Senior Member
359 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: KC Missouri
     
Mar 03, 2008 13:31 |  #1

I was wondering why the silver body is cheaper then the black body is that really that big of a deal. My 300D is a silver body and i got so many comments on it not looking professional is that why there just a little less :rolleyes:. What is professional lol. I happen to like the silver but now im kinda leaning towards a black.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Mar 03, 2008 13:36 |  #2

Heather, my love, your ego can handle what others say about the color of your camera. I would paint mine purple if I thought it would drive people up the wall.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xchupacabrax
Member
Avatar
121 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: California
     
Mar 03, 2008 13:43 |  #3

I think it's just marketing, more people prefer black so they tend to raise the price a little to make a little profit off the black bodies and silver cheaper to sell more silver bodies.


www.olieng.net (external link)
5D / 35
L f1.4 / 135L f2 / 50mm 1.4 / 85mm 1.8 / 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2382
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Mar 03, 2008 13:48 |  #4

It's simply a perception issue. Black cameras as "professional" bodies came into vogue in the 70's and 80's. There's certainly no difference in capability.


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shutterfiend
Goldmember
2,058 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: NJ
     
Mar 03, 2008 13:50 |  #5

You can actually take better pictures with the black.

Let's say you're in a forest shooting random birds. The birds would take one look at your silver camera and fly away in disgust - who cares to be photographed by amateurs.

Now, if your camera was black, they would probably fluff their feathers up or pretend to be pecking at some imaginary insect. It's every bird's dream to be on the cover of National Geographic.

PS: But then again, I don't shoot birds, I shoot people, and people don't differentiate.


https://photography-on-the.net …p=7812587&postc​ount=91776

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zapman
Senior Member
Avatar
391 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
     
Mar 03, 2008 13:51 |  #6

supply and demand is why the price is different low supply, high demand




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dawid
Senior Member
258 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Poland and Kansas City
     
Mar 03, 2008 14:07 as a reply to  @ zapman's post |  #7

Supply and demand indeed. I see silver bodies go for significantly cheaper on Ebay consistently.


Gripper 5D, Gripped 20D, Canon 10-22, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 24-70, Pentax K1000, cardboard boxes....
FC RX7, Subaru Legacy rally car.
"Don't be that guy"- Steve

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ijohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,646 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Whiteriver, AZ
     
Mar 03, 2008 14:13 |  #8

Stick with the silver. Once you go black, well.....


www.trickoflight.net (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/i​tj12345 (external link)
Original 5D still ROCKS!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hland
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
359 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: KC Missouri
     
Mar 03, 2008 14:46 |  #9

Thanks guys lol! I think i might just stick with silver unless i get a wild hair up my you know what and buy a black one lol. But then oh who knows! I just wondered why they were diff in price. :)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S-Man
Goldmember
2,008 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2007
     
Mar 03, 2008 16:29 as a reply to  @ Hland's post |  #10

I always thought silver was more expensive...I saw on Beachcamera.com that the silver was like $20-$40 more expensive than the black.
I like black personally. It's more discreet and not as flashy. i like being able to carry it around in a public place without drawing attention to a giant silver object in my hand.
Like if somone is carrying a gun or knife...People quickly see a silver or chrome gun and know what it is, but if somone is walking with a black glock for instance, noone notices until it's too late.
That's what I like to do with the camera...take the shot before they realize it. Makes for much better candids.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pregnantcowlady
Senior Member
Avatar
408 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Mar 03, 2008 22:44 |  #11

when i wanted a silver body xt, they were always out of stock.
i want a purple one if they would make it. :D


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Mar 04, 2008 00:50 |  #12

Hland wrote in post #5040706 (external link)
Thanks guys lol! I think i might just stick with silver unless i get a wild hair up my you know what and buy a black one lol. But then oh who knows! I just wondered why they were diff in price. :)

actually oit's wild hare....as in rabbit :D.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tma888
Member
212 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Mar 04, 2008 02:35 |  #13

ed rader wrote in post #5044389 (external link)
actually oit's wild hare....as in rabbit :D.

ed rader

Ed,

You Da MAN hahahaha :lol:
i was waiting for someone to comment on that :lol::lol::lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Mar 04, 2008 03:51 |  #14

White lenses dont look very pro either lol
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nzshrimper
a good height for ...
Avatar
10,173 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Christchurch - New Zealand
     
Mar 04, 2008 03:56 |  #15

now someone told me this once..

silver bodies are better in places that have high levels of sunlight.. - the reasoning behind this was that silver reflects heat and sun.. where as the black bodies absorbs the heat / light...

* honestly i think its total bollocks but hey who knows *


© All rights given away
Grammar – the difference between knowing you’re sh1te and knowing your sh1te

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,512 views & 0 likes for this thread, 29 members have posted to it.
Body Color
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
494 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.