Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 28 Oct 2004 (Thursday) 09:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Talk me in or out of the 550EX!

 
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Oct 28, 2004 14:05 |  #16

johndm wrote:
Took the plunge today, now have a nice new 550, and spent an hour or three playing with it.

Hell, it took me that long to find the feet/meters switch.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johndm
Member
Avatar
228 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Bedford UK
     
Oct 28, 2004 14:15 |  #17

robertwgross wrote:
johndm wrote:
Took the plunge today, now have a nice new 550, and spent an hour or three playing with it.

Hell, it took me that long to find the feet/meters switch.

---Bob Gross---

What switch is that then?? :roll:
I hadn't planned on looking at the instruction book for at least a week.. :D


My Very Best Aircraft Pictures (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Oct 28, 2004 14:23 |  #18

johndm wrote:
What switch is that then??

Maybe we should make this a test for each new 550EX owner.

I suppose Canon wanted to put a switch for feet or meters somewhere near the electronics, but they wanted it to be sort of out-of-the-way. It isn't the sort of switch that you will be changing several times per day. Look really hard inside the battery compartment.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Oct 28, 2004 14:28 |  #19

Battery compartment? Wassat? :lol:


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nosquare2003
Senior Member
861 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Hong Kong, China
     
Oct 28, 2004 22:38 |  #20

If you do not upgrade your 10D shortly (from ETTL to ETTL II), you may also consider Metz:

http://www.metz.de …onics/empfehlun​g.142.html (external link)

I will try Metz myself some time later as I won't have ETTL II for quite some time.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DustyDesert
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 29, 2004 07:33 |  #21

When I do upgrade, I will be keeping the 10D for a backup or secondary camera. The Metz 54 MZ4 ranked very high on the report I listed in my first post and it's only a bit more $$. Does anyone here have experience with this flash on a 10D?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imagesense
Member
41 posts
Joined Dec 2003
     
Oct 29, 2004 13:48 |  #22

The Metz may well be the best flash of all but the Canon adapter has not yet been released for the 20D. When that happens I may look at the Metz myself. Even if it works now with the 10D, if you plan on getting a 20D you won't be able to use that flash correctly.
For now I use a Sigma, but the 580EX is next on my shopping list.

Lou




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steven ­ M. ­ Anthony
Senior Member
617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
     
Oct 29, 2004 14:32 |  #23
bannedPermanent ban

I went to my local camera store (oriented towards pros, which I am NOT) to buy the 550ex for my 10D and they would not sell it to me. They said I would hate it because it doesn't really work well--very inconsistent flash results. They said I would just end up bringing it back. But the comments above seem to show people are happy with it. What do you think gives?


Steve
non calor sed umor...
www.smaphoto.com (external link)
www.smallbizwebmn.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Groundworxs
Member
122 posts
Joined Nov 2003
     
Oct 29, 2004 14:50 |  #24

Get it you won't regret it. Range, accurate, features galore, high speed sync nice, and re sale price. Read the manual!!! I have never had a problem with this flash that was not due to my own mistakes.

cheers
Tom




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Oct 29, 2004 15:51 |  #25

Steven M. Anthony wrote:
I went to my local camera store (oriented towards pros, which I am NOT) to buy the 550ex for my 10D and they would not sell it to me. They said I would hate it because it doesn't really work well--very inconsistent flash results. They said I would just end up bringing it back. But the comments above seem to show people are happy with it. What do you think gives?

If you spend only about two minutes trying to learn it, you may get very inconsistent flash results, and that would correlate to the way that local camera store guys work.

OTOH, if you get one, read the manual, practice, read the manual again, practice more, read some here, practice more, etc... then it gets much easier to handle. I would never think of trying to shoot a wedding without one. Well, actually, I take a 420EX along for backup, and there was only once when I pulled out the backup. On my 550EX, there is a little wide-angle diffuser screen that pulls down if you are shooting wide. That little item was just slightly pulled out, so the 550EX thought that it was fully pulled out into wide mode, so it changed the zoom setting on the flash for wide. Of course, I was not intentionally shooting wide, and my long lens did not agree with what the flash was trying to tell me about wide, so I saw this discrepancy. To be safe, I removed the 550EX and used the backup until I studied the wide-angle diffuser screen position and changed it.

That is the kind of stuff that you can get into. There is a lot going on inside the 550EX and its interaction with your camera, and you have to keep up with it.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DustyDesert
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 29, 2004 18:30 |  #26

This wedding reception is the end of November. I realize I need to learn to use it, but if the 550EX is that difficult to use that I have to read the manual over and over, that concerns me. The Metz claims to be simple. Is it when compared to the 550EX?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,134 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Talk me in or out of the 550EX!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1697 guests, 102 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.