Links broke = (
paiintballa182 Senior Member  797 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: *609* New Jersey More info | Mar 09, 2008 23:00 | #1 |
paiintballa182 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 797 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: *609* New Jersey More info | Mar 10, 2008 04:01 | #2 156 views and nothing? _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop  39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Mar 10, 2008 08:37 | #3 I'd have liked a few non flashed - non fisheye images. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paiintballa182 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 797 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: *609* New Jersey More info | Mar 10, 2008 14:03 | #4 The room was almost completely black, without flash even iso3200 would have underexposed everything _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bearmann Goldmember  1,228 posts Likes: 57 Joined Feb 2008 Location: I live behind Graceland in a tool shed. I often meet the man early in the morning at Krispy Kreme. More info | Mar 10, 2008 20:56 | #5 I like the 5th one with that guitar neck that curves around. Perhaps try dragging the shutter more in this very difficult shooting enviroment. Barry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WMah Member 73 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Edmonton, AB More info | Mar 10, 2008 21:17 | #6 wow, these photos make me want to pick up a fisheye but i only have a crop body :\ how close did you have to get to the performer to fill the frame like that? Wilson M - http://www.oh-snap.ca/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paiintballa182 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 797 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: *609* New Jersey More info | Mar 10, 2008 21:40 | #7 very. very. very. close. even on my crop body 10d _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WMah Member 73 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Edmonton, AB More info | Mar 10, 2008 22:15 | #8 lol woah, and the performers were ok w/ u creeping that close to them while they were playing? I never knew the fisheye lens still worked that well on a crop body... the stuff i read online had me thinking that the fisheye effect is drastically reduced on a crop body... seeing these pics and finding out you use a crop body yourself puts the fisheye back on my wishlist Wilson M - http://www.oh-snap.ca/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paiintballa182 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 797 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: *609* New Jersey More info | Mar 11, 2008 01:53 | #9 Well, they are right by saying the effect is greatly reduced, but you see it the most when using full frame fisheye's. To avoid loosing most of the distortion and feel i opted for a circular fisheye(http://www.amazon.com …ics&qid=1205218128&sr=8-2
they turn out looking more "fishy" _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WMah Member 73 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Edmonton, AB More info | Mar 11, 2008 01:59 | #10 oh, cool that is something i would need to try out in the future! Wilson M - http://www.oh-snap.ca/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paiintballa182 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 797 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: *609* New Jersey More info | Mar 11, 2008 03:03 | #11 |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 544 guests, 153 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8
was it the canon 15mm 2.8 that u were using?
