jhom wrote in post #5093341
Well, I got a response to my question about the reduction in light transmission in the Digital versions of the Hoya/Kenko filters. The question was whether the reduction in light transmission in the Pro 1 Digital filters was a design limitation or purposeful design. Here is the response I got back from the Hoya Tech Service Rep:
"Honestly I belive it would be a design limitation, but that is something Japan has never fully clarified."
Now the question is whether this light transmission reduction is a significant difference to affect IQ? Also, a question could be asked if the multicoating difference in the Pro 1 SHMC filters have any negative affects ont the digital sensors?
Any optical engineers out there with any comments?
I am finding it difficult to belive this. As I said earlier 98% is about the same as a HMC coating. This is quite a big difference in reflectance relative to incidence level, -5.6 stops compared to -8.4 stops, about 2.8 stops worse. A big difference on paper.
Checking my lenses I find I have a mixture of SHMC Pro 1 and Pro 1 digital, I have a 10-22mm with a Pro 1 and a 17-40 with a pro 1 digital, looking at the flare test I have to hand:
10-22 @ 17mm f4
No Filter
SHMC Pro 1 UV(O)
17-40 @ 17mm f4
No Filter
Pro 1 Digital UV(O)
So not a direct comparison but the overall impression is there is not a huge visible difference.
One wonders why Hoya have made this change, could it be the old filters were not as good as claimed?