Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 30 Oct 2004 (Saturday) 08:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

a question about all the focus questions

 
gramps
Goldmember
Avatar
1,058 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Mt. WhereinthehellamI? Southen Utah
     
Oct 30, 2004 08:41 |  #1

Does a filter(s) on the lens have any impact on the focus of the camera?


Some pics here - http://pbase.com/sjh (external link)
20 D; 85 1.8; 24-70 L; 70-200 f4L (sold); 100-400 L; 420 Light bulb
1550 Pelican "soft case" & too much junk!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Oct 30, 2004 08:54 |  #2

Not unless it's dirty, and I'd have to think that it would have to be *very* dirty.

AF works by finding contrast. If a filter is dirty enough to reduce contrast significantly this would affect AF. However, I would think that the camera would be more likely to have problems focusing, but it's not so likely to focus on the wrong distance. Of course, AI Servo will take a shot whether something's in focus or not, so beware of that.

Also, polarizers reduce light by about 2 stops. If light gets too low because of this you'll also have problems focusing.

Again, a filter would have to be very dirty I'd say. So, with caveats, the answer is "No, filters won't affect focus."


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Oct 30, 2004 09:19 |  #3

I'll simplify Scott's answer:

No.

;)


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gramps
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,058 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Mt. WhereinthehellamI? Southen Utah
     
Oct 30, 2004 09:25 |  #4

thank you, I didn't think so but thougt I'd ask.


Some pics here - http://pbase.com/sjh (external link)
20 D; 85 1.8; 24-70 L; 70-200 f4L (sold); 100-400 L; 420 Light bulb
1550 Pelican "soft case" & too much junk!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Oct 30, 2004 09:30 |  #5

RFMSports wrote:
No.

I hate that word.

:D


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
12345Michael54321
Senior Member
559 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Baltimore County, Maryland, USA
     
Oct 30, 2004 10:15 |  #6

A filter shouldn't affect focus, but it sometimes can.

Even a high quality filter can, if sufficiently dark, block enough light to impair a camera's ability to determine focus. I'm not talking about a more or less transparent filter like a UV, mind you. I have in mind something more like a rather dark neutral density filter, a red 25 filter, things like that.

And some filters - even if not dark - can shift focus enough that in extreme cases infinity focus cannot be obtained. I don't claim this is common, but it can happen, it does happen, and I've personally experienced it. I would think that this is more likely to be a problem with a budget filter using mediocre quality glass (which may not even be perfectly square to the lens' optical axis), than with a B+W or Heliopan filter. And more of an issue with a telephoto lens than with a wide angle.
--
Michael




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Oct 30, 2004 11:11 |  #7

I have had focus problems that were a direct result of a UV fikter on a specific lens.. and I have read of others with the same experience.

For me it was One lens,. one filter and specific lighting that would throw foucs off on my 10D.. (it only occured out doors)

At the time the lens was my "best" so I began to think my 10D was at fault. but finally I realized the trouble had started around the time I had installed the new Hoya UV filter.

This filter works fine on any other lens I own.. and the lens works fine with a Canon uv filter.. it was just the specific combo?

Again.. in essence.. this should not be a problem.. but it can happen.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KennyG
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
     
Oct 30, 2004 11:39 |  #8

There was an example printed in EOS magazine (I think it was EOS) where someone had problems getting a good focus on a yacht when using a UV filter and perfect without. It was repeatable and may have been lens specific.

I have seen it happen in night conditions where there are bright sources of light (street lighting, car drving lamps, etc.). This is probably due to the reflections caused by the filter/lens combination and it even happens with the very best quality filters.

A linear polarizer will throw the AF system and you should only use circular.

My own view is a hood is far better than a filter for protection, as I prefer not to add another layer of glass in the light path. But that is my view and it usually invites hordes of filter fanatics who think it is some form of evil cult member that works without filters. :wink:


Ken
Professional Motorsport Photographer
2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L,
300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Oct 30, 2004 12:01 |  #9

KennyG wrote:
My own view is a hood is far better than a filter for protection, as I prefer not to add another layer of glass in the light path. But that is my view and it usually invites hordes of filter fanatics who think it is some form of evil cult member that works without filters. :wink:

I'll stand by you on this one Ken. I bought a great (and expensive) Hoya UV because everyone said to buy one, but once I thought about it I just left it in the box. Perhaps I'll use it if I ever shoot in a sandstorm....


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Oct 30, 2004 12:17 |  #10

I *would* agree as far as the use of a filter for protection and the possibilities of image degradation....

But one look at my UV filters and I am convinced I MUST have them... ?! :roll:

I have two that need to be replaced.. one is scratched all to hell.. the other looks.. quite frankly.. like Acid was spilled on it ???

No idea what caused it.. but there are large pits of discoloration that do not come clean. ?

In either case.. had this been my lens element :( :(


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Oct 30, 2004 12:30 |  #11

CDS, you are no longer allowed to borrow any of my lenses.

:D


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Oct 30, 2004 13:38 |  #12

Everything was fine untill those Herons started spitting acid at me! :shock:


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gramps
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,058 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Mt. WhereinthehellamI? Southen Utah
     
Oct 30, 2004 14:50 |  #13

ok this brings up another question!!!!!!!!! what happens when you shoot through a window?


Some pics here - http://pbase.com/sjh (external link)
20 D; 85 1.8; 24-70 L; 70-200 f4L (sold); 100-400 L; 420 Light bulb
1550 Pelican "soft case" & too much junk!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Oct 30, 2004 15:42 |  #14

Depends on the distance. If your subject is just on the other wide of a very dirty window then you could easily lock focus on the window. But if the subject is some distance from the window then you'll easily know if you happen to lock on the window.

If the window is dirty then move closer - you may get a "cloudy" image lacking contrast, but at least you won't get obvious window spots in the image. You can even shoot through a chain-link fence by pushing the camera hood right up against the fence, and if the subject is far enough from the fence then you'll never even know the fence was there. In eithr case, window or fence, a wide-open aperture helps.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Oct 30, 2004 15:49 |  #15

Under most circumstances a filter will not affect focus. Under extreme circumstances yes, they can. But, under certain circumstances some cameras will not achieve AF at all. AF is not perfect on any camera and there will be times where MF is the only way to go, filter or no filter.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,452 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
a question about all the focus questions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1697 guests, 102 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.