Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 11 Mar 2008 (Tuesday) 01:50
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "For an outdoor wedding, would you go with two 5D bodies or one 5D and one 40D?"
Two 5D bodies
46
54.1%
One 5D body and one 40D body
39
45.9%

85 voters, 85 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Two 5D or one 5D and one 40D for wedding?

 
SunTsu
Goldmember
Avatar
1,593 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Westcoast, Canada
     
Mar 11, 2008 01:50 |  #1

If you were to shoot a wedding and had the following TWO options, which would you choose?

Assumptions:
- Cost of the bodies is irrelevant
- You can pick two bodies from either 5D or 40D
- You have the following lenses: 24-105, 85L, 16-35, 100 macro, 70-200 2.8 IS


Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fobulous
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Mar 11, 2008 01:54 |  #2

I'd go two 5D's for consistent low light performance on both bodies, unless you had a really large venue and you wanted to pair the 40D with 70-200 for the reach.


Canon 30D | 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS | 50mm f/1.8 II | 17-40 f/4L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 580EX II | Manfrotto 055PROB w/488RC2 Ballhead

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SunTsu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,593 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Westcoast, Canada
     
Mar 11, 2008 01:55 |  #3

Well, I figure there are advantages to having one 40D:
- Highlight priority. Not sure how big a deal this is.
- Higher FPS for bouquet toss, garter toss.


Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 11, 2008 01:58 |  #4

As much of a fan I am NOT of the 5D, I'd rather use two of those than a 5D and a 40D, assuming you're buying them for me. ;) Having a 1.3x and a 1.6x, I naturally put the longer lens on the 1.6x, but I'd rather they were both 1.3x or FF.

Hope that makes sense.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 11, 2008 02:00 |  #5

SunTsu wrote in post #5091345 (external link)
Well, I figure there are advantages to having one 40D:
- Highlight priority. Not sure how big a deal this is.
- Higher FPS for bouquet toss, garter toss.

-My understanding is HTP is only applied to JPEGs and it limits the camera in functional ways (I don't recall everything but I believe one of them is ISO range).


-You'll have to have awesome lighting, because otherwise you'll be using a flash that cannot recycle at 6.5FPS unless it's barely putting out any power. Depending on your shooting position, you'll probably want a wide angle of view anyway.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SunTsu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,593 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Westcoast, Canada
     
Mar 11, 2008 02:06 |  #6

cdifoto wrote in post #5091352 (external link)
As much of a fan I am NOT of the 5D, I'd rather use two of those than a 5D and a 40D, assuming you're buying them for me. ;) Having a 1.3x and a 1.6x, I naturally put the longer lens on the 1.6x, but I'd rather they were both 1.3x or FF.

Hope that makes sense.

Well, I was originally going to get the 1D Mark III as a 2nd body, but I got scared away by the AF issues. I just checked and the 40D can be had for about $1000 so I figured it wouldn't hurt too bad if I was to use that with one of my 5D bodies. I don't think I'll need the reach, but the FPS might come in handy.


Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rellik
Senior Member
Avatar
720 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Mar 11, 2008 03:32 |  #7

Given the choices, I'd go with two 5Ds. Just so you don't have to think much about crop factors and which lens to go on which. I've never found the FPS to be that important in weddings. Usually, it is better to anticipate the action. I rarely use continuous shot mode. I just use the single shot mode, but firing a few shots per focus.


-Derek 40D, 5D, 5D MK II, 1D Mark III
35L, 50L, 85L, 17-40L, 24-70L, 24-105L, 70-200 F2.8L IS
Vancouver Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Paul ­ Pagano
Member
Avatar
68 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
     
Mar 11, 2008 05:49 |  #8

Money being no object and if weddings are all you shoot, I'd pick two 5D's. If you do stuff other than weddings, you may want the 1.6 crop factor and speed. I shoot weddings and nature so I use a 30D and now a 40D for more versatility since I can't have 'just' wedding cams set apart.


| Canon 40D/BG-E2N | 30D/BG-E2 | 430 EX | 400mm f/5.6L |70-200mm f/4L | 85mm f/1.8 | 24-105mm f/3.5-4.5 Macro | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 |
flickr (external link)
Pbase (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Mar 11, 2008 05:54 |  #9

2 5D's. IQ is better from the 5D and the difference in button placement on the bodies could be enough to slow you don't at times. The ONLY advantage that the 40D would have IMO would be the AF, but I don't think its enough of a difference to really matter. This is coming from someone who owns both.


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adam*
Goldmember
Avatar
4,411 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sheffield
     
Mar 11, 2008 06:19 |  #10

Definately 2 5D's. If you want something fast to back it up then look at a 1dmk2 over the 40D?


:: For sale: 70-200 2.8L :: Nikon D700 ::
:: my site :: www.pbase.com/adamgray​photography (external link) ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arrgeebee
Senior Member
Avatar
835 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
     
Mar 11, 2008 06:25 |  #11

I chose one of each so you could have higher FPS for certain situations. As you mention, Highlight Tome Priority may benefit with bridal gowns as well.


Bob
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=469159
My Gallery (external link) - My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SunTsu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,593 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Westcoast, Canada
     
Mar 11, 2008 11:05 |  #12

Rellik wrote in post #5091585 (external link)
Given the choices, I'd go with two 5Ds. Just so you don't have to think much about crop factors and which lens to go on which. I've never found the FPS to be that important in weddings. Usually, it is better to anticipate the action. I rarely use continuous shot mode. I just use the single shot mode, but firing a few shots per focus.

Do you think the whole crop factor thing will mess with my mind a bit when switching FF and crop bodies? I've never shot with a crop, so I have almost no experience with it.

I think I'm convinced that I don't need high FPS, so the only advantage I can think that the 40D has now is highlight priority.

I was planning the following for lens selection:
Bride getting ready:
- 85mm f/1.2L II
- 24-105mm f/4L

Pre-ceremony. This is at the same venue as the reception as there will not be a traditional Church service. I'll be doing all the venue and set-up shots.
- 16-35mm f/2.8L II
- 100mm macro

Ceremony:
- 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
- 24-105mm f/4L IS

Reception:
- 85mm f/1.2L II
- 24-105mm f/4 and/or 70-200

I'd be interested to hear others' opinions on my lens selection.

Paul Pagano wrote in post #5091879 (external link)
Money being no object and if weddings are all you shoot, I'd pick two 5D's. If you do stuff other than weddings, you may want the 1.6 crop factor and speed. I shoot weddings and nature so I use a 30D and now a 40D for more versatility since I can't have 'just' wedding cams set apart.

At this point, money isn't important because I already have two 5d bodies. I've been wanting a crop body like the Mark III, but opted out because of potential AF issues. At some point, I'll want a crop again, but I'm choosing mostly for a specific wedding date at this point.


Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 11, 2008 11:28 |  #13

SunTsu wrote in post #5093523 (external link)
Do you think the whole crop factor thing will mess with my mind a bit when switching FF and crop bodies? I've never shot with a crop, so I have almost no experience with it.

I think I'm convinced that I don't need high FPS, so the only advantage I can think that the 40D has now is highlight priority.

Highlight Tone Priority would be helpful if you're shooting in Jpeg. From what I've seen, HTP works by lowering the ISO by a stop (e.g. from the 200 baseline to 100) and then, in processing, applies a curve to boost the darker tones up a stop but not boost the highlights.

If you're shooting in RAW, the HTP function passes a flag to a RAW processor to apply the curve to the (1 stop underexposed) RAW data, but your RAW converter may handle this in different ways.

If you're shooting in RAW, you may be best served by leaving HTP off and setting up your exposure to handle highlights properly before the shoot. You'll be able to process the image in your RAW software to get the same or better results as HTP gives.

If your shooting RAW+Jpeg, turning it on would give the benefit of an instant jpeg for viewing at the event, while in your RAW converter you can still fine-tune the image to taste.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 11, 2008 11:39 |  #14

SunTsu wrote in post #5093523 (external link)
Do you think the whole crop factor thing will mess with my mind a bit when switching FF and crop bodies? I've never shot with a crop, so I have almost no experience with it.

I think I'm convinced that I don't need high FPS, so the only advantage I can think that the 40D has now is highlight priority.

I was planning the following for lens selection:
Bride getting ready:
- 85mm f/1.2L II
- 24-105mm f/4L

Pre-ceremony. This is at the same venue as the reception as there will not be a traditional Church service. I'll be doing all the venue and set-up shots.
- 16-35mm f/2.8L II
- 100mm macro

Ceremony:
- 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
- 24-105mm f/4L IS

Reception:
- 85mm f/1.2L II
- 24-105mm f/4 and/or 70-200

I'd be interested to hear others' opinions on my lens selection.


At this point, money isn't important because I already have two 5d bodies. I've been wanting a crop body like the Mark III, but opted out because of potential AF issues. At some point, I'll want a crop again, but I'm choosing mostly for a specific wedding date at this point.

You're overthinking it. You can't really plan the day out lens-wise that far ahead. You're going to have to assess the situation when you get there and then choose the right optic for the task at hand. Unless, of course, you've already been to the locations and seen the lighting exactly as it'll be on the day.

As far as mixing crops, it's not a big deal. You put your longer lens on the camera with the most crop factor, and your wider lens on the camera with no or less crop factor. Then you grab and shoot with the one you need for a given shot.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Paul ­ Pagano
Member
Avatar
68 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
     
Mar 11, 2008 11:53 |  #15

SunTsu wrote in post #5093523 (external link)
Do you think the whole crop factor thing will mess with my mind a bit when switching FF and crop bodies? I've never shot with a crop, so I have almost no experience with it.

I think I'm convinced that I don't need high FPS, so the only advantage I can think that the 40D has now is highlight priority.

I was planning the following for lens selection:
Bride getting ready:
- 85mm f/1.2L II
- 24-105mm f/4L

Pre-ceremony. This is at the same venue as the reception as there will not be a traditional Church service. I'll be doing all the venue and set-up shots.
- 16-35mm f/2.8L II
- 100mm macro

Ceremony:
- 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
- 24-105mm f/4L IS

Reception:
- 85mm f/1.2L II
- 24-105mm f/4 and/or 70-200

I'd be interested to hear others' opinions on my lens selection.


At this point, money isn't important because I already have two 5d bodies. I've been wanting a crop body like the Mark III, but opted out because of potential AF issues. At some point, I'll want a crop again, but I'm choosing mostly for a specific wedding date at this point.

That sounds like a lot of work. You might find yourself rethinking all of that lens changing after the first wedding....to keep it simple, the 85 and the 16-35 would be best mounted on a 5D (each) and the 70-200 in a shoot-sack (or whatever you carry) if you decide its needed. Not sure you'd really need more.


| Canon 40D/BG-E2N | 30D/BG-E2 | 430 EX | 400mm f/5.6L |70-200mm f/4L | 85mm f/1.8 | 24-105mm f/3.5-4.5 Macro | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 |
flickr (external link)
Pbase (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,414 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Two 5D or one 5D and one 40D for wedding?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1100 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.