here is the first review of the 10 - 22 that I have seen..............
http://www.fredmiranda.com …duct=221&sort=7&thecat=27
gramps Goldmember  1,058 posts Joined Oct 2004 Location: Mt. WhereinthehellamI? Southen Utah More info | Oct 31, 2004 09:49 | #1 here is the first review of the 10 - 22 that I have seen.............. Some pics here - http://pbase.com/sjh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DocFrankenstein Cream of the Crop  12,324 posts Likes: 13 Joined Apr 2004 Location: where the buffalo roam More info | Oct 31, 2004 11:30 | #2 Now I want that.... National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drisley "What a Tool I am"  9,002 posts Likes: 108 Joined Nov 2002 More info | Oct 31, 2004 14:11 | #3 Doh, I am hoping that the lens kind of sucks, since I JUST bought a wide angle lens EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timmyquest Goldmember 4,172 posts Joined Dec 2003 Location: Outside of Chicago More info | Oct 31, 2004 14:17 | #4  Permanent bandrisley wrote: Doh, I am hoping that the lens kind of sucks, since I JUST bought a wide angle lens  Thanks for posting. You must have missed the fact that it was a zoom Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drisley "What a Tool I am" 9,002 posts Likes: 108 Joined Nov 2002 More info | Oct 31, 2004 16:31 | #5 Ah yes, must not buy a zoom! EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Persian-Rice Goldmember 1,531 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Behind a viewfinder. More info | Nov 01, 2004 00:13 | #6 Well if it's not quite as good as the 17-40. For that price, I guess it's only good for someone who is serious about landscapes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sp00g3 Member 171 posts Joined Oct 2003 More info | Nov 01, 2004 11:37 | #7 Persian-Rice wrote: Well if it's not quite as good as the 17-40. For that price, I guess it's only good for someone who is serious about landscapes. But it's only one review, so who knows. Hehe, Yeah, and you can always tell yourself that you can pan and stitch pics together for a panoramic. which is MUCH wider
LOG IN TO REPLY |
izzypizzy Member 227 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: L.A, California More info | Nov 01, 2004 11:58 | #8 he's also got a couple more pics on his site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roanjohn Goldmember  3,805 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2003 Location: New York, NY More info | Nov 01, 2004 12:25 | #9 WHoA!!! Look at the HUGE difference between 10 and 17!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gramps THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,058 posts Joined Oct 2004 Location: Mt. WhereinthehellamI? Southen Utah More info | Nov 01, 2004 15:34 | #10 I think I'm gonna have to start a new slush fund............... Some pics here - http://pbase.com/sjh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1697 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
