Lame and totally undeserving of a 1.x release.
Kadath Right, Manage This Digit!  1,642 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2004 Location: Navesink, NJ More info | Lame and totally undeserving of a 1.x release. Canon 20D, Nikon D300 & assorted stuff...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheHoff Don't Hassle....  8,804 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Mar 14, 2008 14:38 | #17 What? They re-enabled a slider and you don't think that is worthy?? ••Vancouver Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cosworth I'm comfortable with my masculinity  10,939 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | Mar 14, 2008 14:47 | #18 Kadath wrote in post #5115759  Lame and totally undeserving of a 1.x release. The faster you get off 1.x nomenclature the better. Software edition numbering is a game that is played because of you, the consumer. people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Krapo Goldmember  1,018 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Brussels, Belgium More info | Mar 14, 2008 15:28 | #19 cosworth wrote in post #5115833 The faster you get off 1.x nomenclature the better. Not really: I'll have to pay for the update! So for me, the longer they stay in 1.x, the better François
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rfreschner ishka bibble  2,576 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Andover, CT...................... Go Red Sox! More info | Mar 14, 2008 18:02 | #20 Kadath wrote in post #5115759 Lame and totally undeserving of a 1.x release. Since the only way LR can support new cameras is with a new release, what numbering would you suggest? Conversely, what exactly constitutes "deserving of a 1.x release"? Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenG Senior Member  531 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Winnipeg, Canada More info | It seems their are alot of people including myself using windows that have found a bug after updating to 1.4. If you convert to dng after import you get an unspecified error message when you convert or enter the develop module. You can't open save etc. Many posts on the lightroom forum. For know I guess I will stick with .cr2 files until this is solved, pretty annoying as I spent a few hours reinstalling, trying to figure out what I believed I had done wrong... Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT  10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Mar 14, 2008 21:49 | #22 Victoria Bampton wrote in post #5113387 Giovanni, it's not a complete ACR rework, so no major changes to reds/oranges at this stage. This release makes adjustments to the extreme ends of the scales. *This does not mean they are ignoring everyone's comments about reds/oranges, just that changes on that are not in this release.* How about telling them to quit enabling that darn Adobe Downloader with each LR update. _
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kadath Right, Manage This Digit! 1,642 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2004 Location: Navesink, NJ More info | Mar 16, 2008 18:32 | #23 I dont give a hoot about its ties to ACR, if there are no new features it shouldnt ever be an x.x release. It's a minor rev at BEST. Canon 20D, Nikon D300 & assorted stuff...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
V8Rumble Senior Member  496 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: White Rock, BC More info | Mar 16, 2008 21:02 | #24  PermanentlyWith a major bug too. Hey Adobe! We are not your beta testers! 30D | 18-50 EX | 30 EX | 55-250 | 150-500 OS HSM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1133 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
