Maderito,
I understand what you are saying, and I agree with a lot of your points.. but I have to disagree with one aspect of your point.
That being your assertion that the use of CF#4 is "overrated"
I disagree because the importance of this set up is clearly highly subjective. For me I can not stress how invaluable this has been to my photography. If you read over some of the other posts here,. you will see many say the same.
As to your question
Q:
A: Because there are times that a photographer may not want the point of exposure to be the same as the point of focus and there are times when splitting these functions from one button to two will in fact make gaining focus and exposure from two seperate parts of the composition much faster.
To me this added control is not over rated at all.
I feel there are some additional points that should be made.
1. The degree to which this method effects your photography will vary considerably based on what and how you shoot.
2. No matter how used to doing things one way or the other, it is allways a good idea to try something that may in fact help to improve your photography and give more control to the photographer and less to the camera.
3. For some reason this debate is reminding a lot of "RAW Vs. jpeg"
In my mind, in both cases.. there is ONE method that clearly offers more control and flexibility which can only benifit the final product. In each case there is however some obvious adjustment that is required on the part of the photographer to allow themselves to take full advantage of the additional control. With RAW Vs. jpeg however, it is also clear that to take advantage of RAW a lot of adjustments must be made,. storage size, post processing time, etc.. all adds up to some solid reasons why somone would not wish to try or switch to RAW.
With CF # 4-1.. all it takes is a a month or less time with your camera set up in a new way.



