Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Mar 2008 (Sunday) 16:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wedding lens and flash.. please help!

 
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Apr 20, 2008 22:16 |  #136

Phil Light wrote in post #5366452 (external link)
I think Tim has good point (as if he needs validation from me :D )

It's always amazed me how couples or families don't bat an eye at spending hundreds, if not thousands of dollars on a cake, invitations, flowers, dresses, napkins, decorations, etc.; all things that will be gone or usless after that day. And yet when it comes to the photographs, the only thing that will last and capture the emotion and memories of the day, they don't bat an eye at having uncle Bob with his shiny new SLR shoot the wedding. :rolleyes:

None of their friends are going to look at the shots 10 years after the wedding, but people will remember not being invited, people will remember the cheap food.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigcountry
Goldmember
Avatar
4,519 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 151
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Apr 20, 2008 22:28 |  #137

hey man, did you get the flash yet? roberts imaging has 430ex's for 200 w/ instant rebate!


Louisville Kentucky Wedding Photographer (external link)
Travel the World and Photograph (external link)
Find me on Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,947 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2872
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Apr 20, 2008 22:43 |  #138

Sad, but true in a lot of quarters Doc.

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #5370738 (external link)
None of their friends are going to look at the shots 10 years after the wedding, but people will remember not being invited, people will remember the cheap food.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gurry
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
71 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Canada, Ontario
     
Apr 21, 2008 15:29 |  #139

yea the flash and card should be here today or tomorrow!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kevin034
Senior Member
473 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Apr 21, 2008 16:19 |  #140

tim wrote in post #5363588 (external link)
So it's good enough for family, but not good enough for paying customers? Is a family wedding less important? Only if you're not the main photog I think.

I was not saying that family is less important. I'm saying that family is more ... forgiving. :) Plus, if you screw up, you won't have the bride trying to sue, instead you just get a family member who'll try to give you a slap in the back of the head (trust me, much better than dealing w/ a customer.)


Kevin
MKIII/5D/24-70/70-200/50

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,947 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2872
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Apr 21, 2008 19:07 |  #141

They may not sue, but you'll be getting the dope slap for the next 50 years or so :lol::lol::lol:.

Kevin034 wrote in post #5375734 (external link)
I was not saying that family is less important. I'm saying that family is more ... forgiving. :) Plus, if you screw up, you won't have the bride trying to sue, instead you just get a family member who'll try to give you a slap in the back of the head.....


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gurry
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
71 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Canada, Ontario
     
Apr 22, 2008 17:32 |  #142

well they both came in on monday, snapped shots right away, and within the first 5 shots, i was impressed with the flash, pointing it straight up and bouncing off the ceiling was a huge difference! but it is really tricky to get used to outside, and still inside, i have to watch for the shutter speed blinking at me as im finding it hard to find a good exposure. any tips on some practice stuff to shoot on other then people? and tips with settings? also i found when i shot my mom cutting the dogs hair, my dog being white, was way over exposed but my mom was fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Ng
Goldmember
Avatar
1,208 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2005
Location: Hartsdale, NY
     
Apr 23, 2008 07:56 |  #143

Gurry wrote in post #5383434 (external link)
well they both came in on monday, snapped shots right away, and within the first 5 shots, i was impressed with the flash, pointing it straight up and bouncing off the ceiling was a huge difference! but it is really tricky to get used to outside, and still inside, i have to watch for the shutter speed blinking at me as im finding it hard to find a good exposure. any tips on some practice stuff to shoot on other then people? and tips with settings? also i found when i shot my mom cutting the dogs hair, my dog being white, was way over exposed but my mom was fine.

Be careful bouncing off the ceiling straight up. If you are close enough to the person and or the ceiling is high enough, the light source (the ceiling) is at a bit of an extreme angle to the person and will create "bags" under their eyes (shadows). This is why many recommend bouncing back behind you - the light source is no longer directly above them and it fills their face nicely. This is another reason I bounce from the side, I never have to worry about that.

As far as your mom/dog situation .. there is no help there except to read read read and understand exposure and metering. It takes most people years of practice and reading and learning and practice to get to a point where they can look at what they want to shoot and know what's possible, what's not possible, and how to set up a camera to take the shot the way they see it. The starting point for ALL of that is understanding metering and exposure:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=249006

And posts numbers 3 and 4 in this thread:
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=255806

Bill


Billy Ng
1 Body
4 Lenses
3 Strobes
Never enough time

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 23, 2008 08:09 |  #144

Or put a white card on the flash for fill - the 580 has one built in.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gurry
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
71 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Canada, Ontario
     
Apr 23, 2008 19:05 |  #145

i also tried bouncing off the wall beside me, and i found that the wall i was bouncing it off of, that side was more bright, then the other side, i also just tried this in the room, so you mean bounce it behind me? how would the flash be angled then? i know it goes straight up, then 1 more click its kind of pointing a bit backwards, or do you mean, turning the head 180 degrees?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,947 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2872
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Apr 23, 2008 19:22 |  #146

Yes, it will rotate 180 degrees backwards to you can bounce it off a near wall.

Gurry wrote in post #5390833 (external link)
....., so you mean bounce it behind me? how would the flash be angled then? i know it goes straight up, then 1 more click its kind of pointing a bit backwards, or do you mean, turning the head 180 degrees?


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
minatophase3
Senior Member
478 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Kent, WA
     
Apr 23, 2008 19:29 |  #147

For that kind of budget I would suggest a 35 2.0 since you will be using a crop body. I've used a Tamron 28-75 2.8 for many weddings on both a 20D and 5D and it works very well but you would have to buy used for your budget. Also, make sure you have plenty of batteries. I shot my first couple of weddings with regular AA batteries and I hated it. It takes way too long for the flash to cycle properly, especially after you have taken 40 or 50 shots. I now use an external battery pack.

Good luck and have fun
Tim


"We walk by faith, not by sight" - II Corinthians 5:7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canoncad
Senior Member
372 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Apr 23, 2008 19:38 as a reply to  @ post 5137522 |  #148

For wedding,
at indoor, I am using mainly 35L & 85L. Prime...............:eek:
at outdoor, I am using mainly 35L & 135L. Prime ...............:eek:


Fairfax Virginia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Apr 24, 2008 05:34 |  #149

I don't think primes are a great idea for a beginner.

minatophase3 wrote in post #5390967 (external link)
For that kind of budget I would suggest a 35 2.0 since you will be using a crop body. I've used a Tamron 28-75 2.8 for many weddings on both a 20D and 5D and it works very well but you would have to buy used for your budget. Also, make sure you have plenty of batteries. I shot my first couple of weddings with regular AA batteries and I hated it. It takes way too long for the flash to cycle properly, especially after you have taken 40 or 50 shots. I now use an external battery pack.

Did you use AA batteries in the camera, and you used the flash in the camera? That doesn't sound like a very good plan...


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,947 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2872
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Apr 24, 2008 05:41 |  #150

Did you use the rechargable batteries or the throw-aways? The rechargables will give you very very good life and recycle relatively fast between flashes. I keep a couple of sets with me for each wedding and I never exhaust all of them.

minatophase3 wrote in post #5390967 (external link)
...... I shot my first couple of weddings with regular AA batteries and I hated it. It takes way too long for the flash to cycle properly, especially after you have taken 40 or 50 shots. I now use an external battery pack.

Good luck and have fun
Tim


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

18,007 views & 0 likes for this thread, 44 members have posted to it.
Wedding lens and flash.. please help!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2929 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.