So what's the newest L? All I can think of are on there.
The Newest "L" was the 28-300mmL
If that's on the list.. than the list is current (sorry.. can't open the file at work)
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Nov 03, 2004 12:10 | #16 Jon wrote: So what's the newest L? All I can think of are on there. The Newest "L" was the 28-300mmL GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timmyquest Goldmember 4,172 posts Joined Dec 2003 Location: Outside of Chicago More info | Nov 03, 2004 12:29 | #17 Permanent banJon wrote: timmyquest wrote: No, you want to talk about frustration.... Picture this, a guy from the paper with a brand new 1D MKII, a sealed 300mm f/2.8 and a 550EX. It's starting to rain, and he is forced to cover his camera with a black garbage bag simply because canon forgot to weather seal their pro flashes I was really hoping they'd seal the 580...but they didnt. I think Pekka raised this a while ago. I seriously doubt you'll see a regular flash that's weather-sealed because you're dealing with some very high voltages inside, and the trigger circuits are exposed through the hot-shoe. So they'd also have to weather-seal the flash-camera connection, without making the flash incompatible with any of the other Eos cameras (or the G series!) and while ensuring a secure electrical contact between flash and camera. This is necessary both for reliability (don't want moisture shorting the circuit and having the flash go off prematurely) and safety (really don't want high voltage leaking out and being conducted around by the water film over everything). If you really want to be that weather-tight, I have two words for you: Nikonos, Ikelite. And i understand that valid point, but the hotshoe can be fixed with a long strip of electrical tape. Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samdring Senior Member 392 posts Joined Aug 2003 Location: Crooked Spire, Derbyshire More info | Nov 03, 2004 12:53 | #18 PacAce wrote: steven wrote: So is there any way of telling which L lenses are weatherized and which are not? Yup. Just take a look at the lens mount. If there's a rubber seal ring around it, then it's weather sealed. My 17-40 has not (never had) a rubber seal Have a Care
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Nov 03, 2004 14:16 | #19 samdring wrote: PacAce wrote: steven wrote: So is there any way of telling which L lenses are weatherized and which are not? Yup. Just take a look at the lens mount. If there's a rubber seal ring around it, then it's weather sealed. My 17-40 has not (never had) a rubber seal Then I guess it's not weather sealed, right? ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samdring Senior Member 392 posts Joined Aug 2003 Location: Crooked Spire, Derbyshire More info | Nov 03, 2004 14:30 | #20 PacAce wrote: samdring wrote: PacAce wrote: steven wrote: So is there any way of telling which L lenses are weatherized and which are not? Yup. Just take a look at the lens mount. If there's a rubber seal ring around it, then it's weather sealed. My 17-40 has not (never had) a rubber seal Then I guess it's not weather sealed, right? The 17-40 Canon Manual says it is Have a Care
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KennyG Goldmember 2,252 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Leeds, UK More info | Nov 03, 2004 15:23 | #21 GenEOS wrote: the push/pull zoom can't be sealed and it doesn't hve a gasket on the mount. The 28-300L is push-pull and sealed. It is simply the age of the 100-400L design, which looks like it will be updated in 2005. Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GenEOS Senior Member 740 posts Joined Jan 2003 Location: Pearland, Texas More info | Nov 03, 2004 15:31 | #22 Timmy are you talking about me?? Daniel Tunstall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Nov 03, 2004 15:37 | #23 samdring wrote: PacAce wrote: samdring wrote: PacAce wrote: steven wrote: So is there any way of telling which L lenses are weatherized and which are not? Yup. Just take a look at the lens mount. If there's a rubber seal ring around it, then it's weather sealed. My 17-40 has not (never had) a rubber seal Then I guess it's not weather sealed, right? The 17-40 Canon Manual says it is Then it has to have the seal. Check the outer rim of the lens mount. Run your fingers over the edge and you should be able to feel it even if you can't see it (probably because it's black just like the body of the lens). ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2455 guests, 101 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||