Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Nov 2004 (Wednesday) 08:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Question for L owners

 
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Nov 03, 2004 12:10 |  #16

Jon wrote:
So what's the newest L? All I can think of are on there.

The Newest "L" was the 28-300mmL

If that's on the list.. than the list is current (sorry.. can't open the file at work)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timmyquest
Goldmember
4,172 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Outside of Chicago
     
Nov 03, 2004 12:29 |  #17
bannedPermanent ban

Jon wrote:
timmyquest wrote:
No, you want to talk about frustration....

Picture this, a guy from the paper with a brand new 1D MKII, a sealed 300mm f/2.8 and a 550EX.

It's starting to rain, and he is forced to cover his camera with a black garbage bag simply because canon forgot to weather seal their pro flashes :roll:

I was really hoping they'd seal the 580...but they didnt.

I think Pekka raised this a while ago. I seriously doubt you'll see a regular flash that's weather-sealed because you're dealing with some very high voltages inside, and the trigger circuits are exposed through the hot-shoe. So they'd also have to weather-seal the flash-camera connection, without making the flash incompatible with any of the other Eos cameras (or the G series!) and while ensuring a secure electrical contact between flash and camera. This is necessary both for reliability (don't want moisture shorting the circuit and having the flash go off prematurely) and safety (really don't want high voltage leaking out and being conducted around by the water film over everything). If you really want to be that weather-tight, I have two words for you: Nikonos, Ikelite.

And i understand that valid point, but the hotshoe can be fixed with a long strip of electrical tape.

All i'm asking is that the buttons and head be water resistant, anyone who thinsk they can stand out in a monsoon with a "light emiting tazer" (i guess...) is a fool.

But zip lock bags and rubber bands get annoying ;-)a


Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samdring
Senior Member
Avatar
392 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Crooked Spire, Derbyshire
     
Nov 03, 2004 12:53 |  #18

PacAce wrote:
steven wrote:
So is there any way of telling which L lenses are weatherized and which are not?

Yup. Just take a look at the lens mount. If there's a rubber seal ring around it, then it's weather sealed.

BTW, the new TCs are weather sealed, too.

My 17-40 has not (never had) a rubber seal ?


Have a Care
Sam

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Nov 03, 2004 14:16 |  #19

samdring wrote:
PacAce wrote:
steven wrote:
So is there any way of telling which L lenses are weatherized and which are not?

Yup. Just take a look at the lens mount. If there's a rubber seal ring around it, then it's weather sealed.

BTW, the new TCs are weather sealed, too.

My 17-40 has not (never had) a rubber seal ?

Then I guess it's not weather sealed, right?


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samdring
Senior Member
Avatar
392 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Crooked Spire, Derbyshire
     
Nov 03, 2004 14:30 |  #20

PacAce wrote:
samdring wrote:
PacAce wrote:
steven wrote:
So is there any way of telling which L lenses are weatherized and which are not?

Yup. Just take a look at the lens mount. If there's a rubber seal ring around it, then it's weather sealed.

BTW, the new TCs are weather sealed, too.

My 17-40 has not (never had) a rubber seal ?

Then I guess it's not weather sealed, right?

The 17-40 Canon Manual says it is


Have a Care
Sam

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KennyG
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
     
Nov 03, 2004 15:23 |  #21

GenEOS wrote:
the push/pull zoom can't be sealed and it doesn't hve a gasket on the mount.

The 28-300L is push-pull and sealed. It is simply the age of the 100-400L design, which looks like it will be updated in 2005.

Also, as far as I am aware the 17-40L has always had weather sealing. The gasket is difficult to see and you may not notice it is there.

Weather sealing is key to me and I couldn't work without it, bearing in mind our UK climate. Two of the race circuits I work at can have the full gamut of weather in one day, from hot sunshine to hailstones.


Ken
Professional Motorsport Photographer
2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L,
300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
Nov 03, 2004 15:31 |  #22

Timmy are you talking about me??

Hey, If you are going to use a trash bag for weather sealing, use a clear one so you can still chimp. Clear plastic trash bags and a roll of gaffers tape will weather seal anything. Cost....about $6.


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Nov 03, 2004 15:37 |  #23

samdring wrote:
PacAce wrote:
samdring wrote:
PacAce wrote:
steven wrote:
So is there any way of telling which L lenses are weatherized and which are not?

Yup. Just take a look at the lens mount. If there's a rubber seal ring around it, then it's weather sealed.

BTW, the new TCs are weather sealed, too.

My 17-40 has not (never had) a rubber seal ?

Then I guess it's not weather sealed, right?

The 17-40 Canon Manual says it is

Then it has to have the seal. Check the outer rim of the lens mount. Run your fingers over the edge and you should be able to feel it even if you can't see it (probably because it's black just like the body of the lens).


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,183 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Question for L owners
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2455 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.