Well, I have searched and read many posts, but I would like to know more opinions.
I am looking to purchase a wide angle prime for use with my 40D. I am lusting after a 24mm L or the 35mm L, but was curious if there are other more affordable primes between 20mm-50mm that would work just as well. I have checked and I am usually between the 24-35mm mark when shooting. I love using primes for portraits and I would like to get something that is good by f2.8 and larger. I have made some beautiful portraits using my 50 1.4, but I could really use something with a large aperature and a wider angle. I do natural/ambient light photography only and I would like to get something that will excel in this arena.
I have looked into the Sigma 30mm and there are too many focusing issues with it and I don't want issues when I use it for closeups and far-off pictures. I thought about the Canon 28 1.8, but I don't know if it will perform like I want it to (good IQ, useable large aperature, no CA issues). All the other Canon primes in the 20-35 range don't seem fast enough as most only go to 2.8 and my Brick can cover those ranges. I prefer USM or a quiet focusing motor since I do photograph small children/infants/family and I want to be as quiet as possible. (I may also expand into wedding photography later too.) I would also benefit from a close focusing distance as well as great IQ and low light performance. Does this only leave me with the L primes or are there other more affordable primes that can be relied upon? I also thought about manual primes, but I can't rely on my vision to accurately give me a sharp picture so I would need AF as well.
If examples of my work is needed, please visit my flickr page to see.

.

