Why not 16-35L?
Azzure_7 Goldmember 1,102 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Austin, TX. Singapore, Bogor, Indonesia. More info |
Mar 19, 2008 15:56 | #17 Azzure_7 wrote in post #5141899 Why not 16-35L? To be honest, I already have the 24-35mm range covered with my 24-70L so I wouldn't be gaining much from this lens. I am looking specifically for a prime as they have the larger aperature that I am looking for. Thanks for the suggestion though. Canon 5D Mk II | 40D | 35L | 50L | 85 1.8 | 135L | Lowepro Off Trail 2 | Canon 1EG | Shootsac
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1457 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||