tell me now!!!! lol is it good or not! btw when is it suppose to come out?
zeva Goldmember 2,533 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Silicon Valley, CA More info | Mar 17, 2008 20:42 | #16 tell me now!!!! lol is it good or not! btw when is it suppose to come out? 40D :20D: Speedlite 430ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper. More info | AWESOME...looks like Canon has fallen off the boat with giving more options on new lens or even updated ones. My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Medic85 I just quoted Forrest Gump! 2,018 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Charlotte, NC More info | Mar 17, 2008 21:10 | #19 a521 wrote in post #5136873 I'd love to try it out, but I'll be it will be over $300. I think Sigma overprices their lenses...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper. More info | same here..i am guessing $280 thats just my guess. So they can pull sales from the Canon. My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Mar 17, 2008 21:12 | #21 Frickin' Sigma. They're gonna make me broke and end my marriage... "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Medic85 I just quoted Forrest Gump! 2,018 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Charlotte, NC More info | Mar 17, 2008 21:13 | #22 Maybe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Medic85 I just quoted Forrest Gump! 2,018 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Charlotte, NC More info | Mar 17, 2008 21:16 | #23 Tony-S wrote in post #5136955 Frickin' Sigma. They're gonna make me broke and end my marriage... Anyone want to buy a EF 50mm f/1.4? It's only 5 months old... That's going to be my problem too
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fabrian Senior Member 579 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Sebastian, Florida More info | Mar 17, 2008 21:17 | #24 Tony-S wrote in post #5136955 Anyone want to buy a EF 50mm f/1.4? It's only 5 months old... After all of your "soft" inserts and complaints, do you really think someone here is going to by your 50? Brian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Mar 17, 2008 21:18 | #25 Believe me, you don't want it. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrChad Goldmember 2,815 posts Joined Aug 2004 Location: Chicagoland More info | I don't see how this lens will price much cheaper then the 30/1.4. I kaNt sPeL...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Mar 17, 2008 21:23 | #27 Fabrian wrote in post #5137000 After all of your "soft" inserts and complaints, do you really think someone here is going to by your 50? ![]() Nah, the only one on these forums that I'd sell it to is my good buddy Ed Rader. I wouldn't feel the least bit guilty about that. It was already said, but I hope there's no inherent focusing issues after calibration.. I wish I was one of the lucky ones who had a proper 30 ![]() The only issues I've had with gear are my 50mm and my pop-up flash on my 30D. Sometimes it pops up, sometimes it doesn't. I'm just a couple of months out of my warranty, but emailed Canon about it in late Nov or Dec. Not sure if they'd fix it for free at this point. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fabrian Senior Member 579 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Sebastian, Florida More info | I'd bet a lens that the Sigma version will be sharp and contrasty wide open. This is going to be the sway IMO. Brian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Mar 17, 2008 21:26 | #29 MrChad wrote in post #5137029 I don't see how this lens will price much cheaper then the 30/1.4. It's not as if the Sigma Macro Primes are any cheaper then the Canon equivalents, 100mm/2.8 for example. Not sure what the exact point of this lens is. It's not as if the Canon version is aweful, it's one of the sharpest spoons in the drawer with FTM for $300-ish. The only advantage I see for this lens is hood (shade) in the box. ![]() one good thing about this lens is it is FF. if the IQ is stellar and it doesn't mis-focus is great it could compete with canon's defective 50L 1.2. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Mar 17, 2008 21:28 | #30 MrChad wrote in post #5137029 I don't see how this lens will price much cheaper then the 30/1.4. I bet it comes in just about the same or a bit more than the 30mm. It's not as if the Sigma Macro Primes are any cheaper then the Canon equivalents, 100mm/2.8 for example. Well, the Sigma is cheaper, but it's not as capable, either (no HSM or internal focus). Not sure what the exact point of this lens is. It's not as if the Canon version is aweful, it's one of the sharpest spoons in the drawer with FTM for $300-ish. Hey, you're right! I happen to have one for sale. I was saving it for a good buddy, but you can have it if you want it! The only advantage I see for this lens is hood (shade) in the box. ![]() I guarantee you, this Sigma will be substantially better built than the EF 50mm f/1.4. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1148 guests, 143 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||