JJD, look at the 6th photo from the start of this thread. You can clearly see the two small wheel wells inside the 1620. You will also see that they are not an issue. 
Rudi Goldmember 3,751 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2002 Location: Australia More info | May 16, 2009 20:33 | #76 JJD, look at the 6th photo from the start of this thread. You can clearly see the two small wheel wells inside the 1620. You will also see that they are not an issue. • Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 17, 2009 10:07 | #77 Rudi wrote in post #7935040 JJD, look at the 6th photo from the start of this thread. You can clearly see the two small wheel wells inside the 1620. You will also see that they are not an issue. ![]() Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I ended up placing an order through LeisurePro on Wednesday. I can't wait for it to arrive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MBrown Hatchling 5 posts Joined Jul 2009 More info | Thanks to ben_r_ for the informative review. I was already leaning heavily toward this case and this thread cemented my desire to buy it. I ordered from Cases4Less in California (they'll be shipping to me up in Toronto, ON) - even with the shipping rates, it'll still be cheaper than buying locally. http://www.morganbrownphoto.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tanden Mostly Lurking 12 posts Joined Aug 2010 More info | Aug 10, 2010 03:20 | #80 Can anyone tell me if the 1624 will accomodate a Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VRII standing vertically up?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ THREAD STARTER -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Aug 10, 2010 11:53 | #81 Tanden wrote in post #10692740 Can anyone tell me if the 1624 will accomodate a Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VRII standing vertically up? I'm trying to make an informed decision on which model to buy, but I'd like to have this lens standing vertically with nothing touching the top of it (lens cap). Any insight would be greatly appreciated! Being that the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VRII is only .7 inches (18mm) longer than the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, I am going to say yes it should fit fine. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WhiteEagle Hatchling 9 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | nevermind already been said and answered
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wernersl Goldmember 1,944 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Temecula, CA More info | Aug 16, 2010 15:55 | #83 Glad i found this. I currently use my 1620 to tote around my old school white lightnings (coffee can lights). I destroyed the pick n pluck foam for any future use as a camera case...hence the search for the dividers. Would like to use for weddings, as carrying seperate bags for our stuff is really a pain (4 bodies, 8 lenses, a variety of flashes and other stuff). Plus it would draw a lot more attention to someone trying to haul away a pelican case than a cumpler, so it adds a sense of security (not that anything in this world is theft proof...just makes it that much more difficult to someone looking to walk off with my stuff)! I'm happy to see all your gear fit in there nicely. And by looking at where you have your 70-200...it looks like it might be wide enough in those pockets to accomodate the 200 1.8L. Thanks to you it looks like I will be plunking down the $149 for the dividers (BnH price). Thanks for doing this. Shawn l Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ THREAD STARTER -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Aug 16, 2010 16:34 | #84 Very welcome [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hihohito Member 225 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | May 13, 2011 16:42 | #85 Thank You guys. I was thinking of buying the thinktank airport something v.2 but the 1620 is a better option to protect my gear. I will order the case when I'm coming back from my short vacation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bianchi Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 05, 2011 13:07 | #86 Although this is a older review its excellent. Would like to thank Ben et al for all the follow up feed back to Ben's review.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ THREAD STARTER -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Nov 05, 2011 20:12 | #87 Yea I never did buy it, but I still plan to someday. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apollo.11 Goldmember 1,845 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Dec 30, 2011 23:10 | #88 Ben,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ THREAD STARTER -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Dec 30, 2011 23:48 | #89 Nice! Glad you like it and glad the review helped! [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apollo.11 Goldmember 1,845 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Dec 31, 2011 00:19 | #90 Will do. I can't believe I was worried about it being too big. I have only one or 2 empty slots.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1448 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||