Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 04 Nov 2004 (Thursday) 11:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

AlienBees are too Powerful!

 
minatophase3
Senior Member
478 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Kent, WA
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:19 |  #1

I just got my AB800's last night and found out that they are too powerful for the size of my studio. Has anyone experienced this or am I doing something wrong?

Here is the setup I used.

Large white roll of paper for background (9 feet wide)
1 - AB800 with 48" brolly box
1 - AB800 with 48" silver/white umbrella

I was shooting in a double car garage which would be very typical of the size of studio I will be using. I will also be in slightly smaller areas as I plan on taking the Bee's on location to people's houses and will have to setup in a living room or something similar.

I had the AB800 with brolly box about 6 feet away from the subject and the AB800 with silver/white umbrella about 6 feet away as well.

From those distances, even with the lights turned down as far as they wold go, I needed to shoot at 1/160 and f8 to get a decent exposure. This would really limit my creative ability to blur the background with larger (ie. 1.8, 2.0, etc) aperatures.

Please help, am I doing something wrong or is this just a reality of working in a small stuido area? I would really like the ability to use the full range of aperature settings my lenses offer.

Right now, they are boxed up and ready to be exchanged for a couple of AB400's. Any advice is appreciated.

Tim


"We walk by faith, not by sight" - II Corinthians 5:7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlipsidE
Goldmember
Avatar
1,701 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: South Carolina USA
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:26 |  #2

Hmmm....in the Lighting for Glamour Photography book I was reading, the shutter speeds were always quite fast even with the narrow aperture. What settings is your Sekonic meter telling you to use?

FlipsidE


FlipsidE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
minatophase3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
478 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Kent, WA
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:32 |  #3

FlipsidE wrote:
Hmmm....in the Lighting for Glamour Photography book I was reading, the shutter speeds were always quite fast even with the narrow aperture. What settings is your Sekonic meter telling you to use?

FlipsidE

The Sekonic is telling me to use 1/160 and between 5.6 & 8.0 aperature. I don't mind using the faster shutter speed, what I am concerned is that if I want to get a little more creative and shoot a model at say aperature 2.0, there doesn't seem to be a way to do it without moving the lights back quite a bit farther. That wouldn't be an issue if I had unlimited room, but I know I won't.

I have always read that you should get the most power as you can always dial them down, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Again, maybe I am doing something wrong.

Tim


"We walk by faith, not by sight" - II Corinthians 5:7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlipsidE
Goldmember
Avatar
1,701 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: South Carolina USA
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:35 |  #4

hmmmm...I honestly don't know then. I would figure the flash meter would tell you to use a higher shutter speed. Give it a shot at 1/250 and see how it comes out. I'm just curious to see what happens with a faster shutter speed.

FlipsidE


FlipsidE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
minatophase3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
478 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Kent, WA
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:41 |  #5

FlipsidE wrote:
hmmmm...I honestly don't know then. I would figure the flash meter would tell you to use a higher shutter speed. Give it a shot at 1/250 and see how it comes out. I'm just curious to see what happens with a faster shutter speed.

FlipsidE

I did try a faster shutter speed, but cannot exceed 1/200 (D60). Even at 1/200 I needed to use 5.6. Again, this may be just the way it is with lights as I have never used them before.

Tim


"We walk by faith, not by sight" - II Corinthians 5:7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:42 |  #6

Shutter speed shouldn't make too much difference for the flashes as long as they can sync. They're only producing a brief burst of light, and you need to keep your shutter speed within the X-sync capabilities for the flash in question (Canon claims only 1/60 sec. for non-Canon EX flashes), but otherwise shutter speed will only impact the background (available light) exposure. Your primary controls for studio flash are flash output, shutter speed, and flash-subject distance.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slin100
Senior Member
976 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Cupertino, CA
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:46 |  #7

Jon wrote:
Your primary controls for studio flash are flash output, shutter speed, and flash-subject distance.

Jon, I think you meant flash output, aperture, and flash-subject distance.

If the flash is too strong and you cannot move them back, one option is to use neutral-density gels to absorb some of the light put out by the flash.


Steven
7D, 10D, 17-40/4L, 50/1.8 Mk I, 85/1.8, Tamron 28-75/2.8, 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS, 80-200/2.8L, 550EX, Pocket Wizard

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Quinn ­ Porter
Member
107 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:47 |  #8

Changing the shutter speed is not going to make a difference unless you have a good deal of ambient light. Rather than exchange the 800s for 400s, I would use a neutral density filter on the lens or on the lights. The Alien Bees set of ND filters is only $22. This lets you retain the power in case you ever need it... and you will.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
minatophase3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
478 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Kent, WA
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:52 |  #9

Quinn Porter wrote:
Changing the shutter speed is not going to make a difference unless you have a good deal of ambient light. Rather than exchange the 800s for 400s, I would use a neutral density filter on the lens or on the lights. The Alien Bees set of ND filters is only $22. This lets you retain the power in case you ever need it... and you will.

Can the ND filters be used with an umbrella, brolly box or softbox? I bought the color filters and it doesn't look like they can be used with the attachments on the lights.

Tim


"We walk by faith, not by sight" - II Corinthians 5:7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlipsidE
Goldmember
Avatar
1,701 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: South Carolina USA
     
Nov 04, 2004 11:59 |  #10

Quinn Porter wrote:
Changing the shutter speed is not going to make a difference unless you have a good deal of ambient light. Rather than exchange the 800s for 400s, I would use a neutral density filter on the lens or on the lights. The Alien Bees set of ND filters is only $22. This lets you retain the power in case you ever need it... and you will.

- I learned something today :)

FlipsidE


FlipsidE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 04, 2004 12:01 |  #11

slin100 wrote:
Jon wrote:
Your primary controls for studio flash are flash output, shutter speed, and flash-subject distance.

Jon, I think you meant flash output, aperture, and flash-subject distance.

If the flash is too strong and you cannot move them back, one option is to use neutral-density gels to absorb some of the light put out by the flash.

Right you are. Dunno where my mind was, since I'd just finished saying shutter speed didn't matter!


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveG
Goldmember
2,040 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
     
Nov 04, 2004 12:02 |  #12

minatophase3 wrote:
I just got my AB800's last night and found out that they are too powerful for the size of my studio. Has anyone experienced this or am I doing something wrong?

Here is the setup I used.

Large white roll of paper for background (9 feet wide)
1 - AB800 with 48" brolly box
1 - AB800 with 48" silver/white umbrella

I was shooting in a double car garage which would be very typical of the size of studio I will be using. I will also be in slightly smaller areas as I plan on taking the Bee's on location to people's houses and will have to setup in a living room or something similar.

I had the AB800 with brolly box about 6 feet away from the subject and the AB800 with silver/white umbrella about 6 feet away as well.

From those distances, even with the lights turned down as far as they wold go, I needed to shoot at 1/160 and f8 to get a decent exposure. This would really limit my creative ability to blur the background with larger (ie. 1.8, 2.0, etc) aperatures.

Please help, am I doing something wrong or is this just a reality of working in a small stuido area? I would really like the ability to use the full range of aperature settings my lenses offer.

Right now, they are boxed up and ready to be exchanged for a couple of AB400's. Any advice is appreciated.

Tim

As everyone else will tell you the shutterspeed is not of any importance in your flash exposure unless you have a tremendous amount of ambient light.

More to the point is the power your flashes are putting out. Your 800 is about 320 watt/second flash and I can get my 400 w/s flash down to f5.6 with ISO 100 without any trouble at all, and that's at those distances into an umbrella at half power. Your 800 will let you go down to 1/32nd power - my ancient 400w/s Multiblitz has only full and half power - so that should be using very little power or you are using an extrordinary ISO like 1600.

Have you used the 1/32nd power setting? What is your ISO? If you somehow ARE at 1/32 power the Alien Bee 400's will only give you one stop less light since they are 160 w/s.


"There's never time to do it right. But there's always time to do it over."
Canon 5D, 50D; 16-35 f2.8L, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 f1.4, 100 f2.8 Macro, 70-200 f2.8L, 300mm f2.8L IS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
minatophase3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
478 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Kent, WA
     
Nov 04, 2004 12:15 |  #13

DaveG wrote:
As everyone else will tell you the shutterspeed is not of any importance in your flash exposure unless you have a tremendous amount of ambient light.

More to the point is the power your flashes are putting out. Your 800 is about 320 watt/second flash and I can get my 400 w/s flash down to f5.6 with ISO 100 without any trouble at all, and that's at those distances into an umbrella at half power. Your 800 will let you go down to 1/32nd power - my ancient 400w/s Multiblitz has only full and half power - so that should be using very little power or you are using an extrordinary ISO like 1600.

Have you used the 1/32nd power setting? What is your ISO? If you somehow ARE at 1/32 power the Alien Bee 400's will only give you one stop less light since they are 160 w/s.

I was using ISO 100 and I did try turning them down as far as they would go. Could it be the materials that the umbrella and brolly box are made of? I could see how different umbrellas would reflect light differently. What sort of umbrellas do you use?


"We walk by faith, not by sight" - II Corinthians 5:7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imagesense
Member
41 posts
Joined Dec 2003
     
Nov 04, 2004 12:19 |  #14

The ISO is important. I always use ISO 100 with my Bee studio setup.
I use one 800 and one 400 with softbox & umbrella and I have not had any trouble adjusting the lights.

Lou




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveG
Goldmember
2,040 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
     
Nov 04, 2004 12:23 |  #15

minatophase3 wrote:
DaveG wrote:
As everyone else will tell you the shutterspeed is not of any importance in your flash exposure unless you have a tremendous amount of ambient light.

More to the point is the power your flashes are putting out. Your 800 is about 320 watt/second flash and I can get my 400 w/s flash down to f5.6 with ISO 100 without any trouble at all, and that's at those distances into an umbrella at half power. Your 800 will let you go down to 1/32nd power - my ancient 400w/s Multiblitz has only full and half power - so that should be using very little power or you are using an extrordinary ISO like 1600.

Have you used the 1/32nd power setting? What is your ISO? If you somehow ARE at 1/32 power the Alien Bee 400's will only give you one stop less light since they are 160 w/s.

I was using ISO 100 and I did try turning them down as far as they would go. Could it be the materials that the umbrella and brolly box are made of? I could see how different umbrellas would reflect light differently. What sort of umbrellas do you use?

If you can get f8 out of two Alien Bee 800's at 1/32 power @ ISO 100 into an umbrella, then I want to buy those flashes! Please check again to make sure that you don't have them at half power, while you're thinking that it's lower. There is just not enough power in these things to give you the kind of output you describe.

Now there is a chance that the power setting knob is not actually changing the power settings as you change from 1 to 1/2 to 1/4 and so forth, but that seems unlikely due to the fact that you have two of them.


"There's never time to do it right. But there's always time to do it over."
Canon 5D, 50D; 16-35 f2.8L, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 f1.4, 100 f2.8 Macro, 70-200 f2.8L, 300mm f2.8L IS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

15,876 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
AlienBees are too Powerful!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2455 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.