Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 04 Nov 2004 (Thursday) 11:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

AlienBees are too Powerful!

 
minatophase3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
478 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Kent, WA
     
Nov 04, 2004 12:30 |  #16

I bought the 4 channel wired remote and I know that I had the controls slid all the way over to the left which greatly reduced the output of the lights.

I did not mess with the settings on the lights themselves as I assumed that the wired remote would over ride those. Maybe that is where I am going wrong. Does anyone have experience with the wired remote?

I will also double check my ISO settings when I get home to verify it was set at ISO 100.

Tim


"We walk by faith, not by sight" - II Corinthians 5:7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daveh
Senior Member
318 posts
Joined Apr 2003
     
Nov 04, 2004 13:31 |  #17

minatophase3 wrote:
I will also double check my ISO settings when I get home to verify it was set at ISO 100.

That seems like a likely culprit. With a single B800, just 3 feet from the subject using a softbox, I'm reading f3.2 at ISO 100.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,914 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
Nov 04, 2004 13:43 |  #18

A couple of things from my experience.

Distance is a big factor. While mine are AB1600s I have them about 8 feet away for the soft box and 10 feet for the umbrella both from the model with background about another 3 feet behind. I have mine set at 1/16th So equivilant of AB800 at 1/8th. I often have problems getting apertures of wider the f4.0 at 1/180 or 1/250 which is what I shoot at with my 10D. I had to move mine as far back as possible to get that flexability.

Also note, while not sure about wired remote, the wireless remote caused me to have an upper limit of 1/180 where as a sync cord and flash slaving the rest works at 1/250 fairly well (some darkening at bottom sometimes), but no shutter cutoff.

I suspect with AB800 at 6 feet I would end up running them at 1/32nd power and have similiar problems.

Something to try is to bounce the light off a reflector, this will have the effect of increasing the distance the light travels. When I need sharper DOF, I usually shut down one light and bounce the other off a reflector as fill.

Just a thought, although I know the ABs are more powerful then I thought they would be.


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nat869
Senior Member
Avatar
935 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2004
Location: South San Francisco Bay Area
     
Nov 04, 2004 13:45 |  #19

I just recently got two AB 800's like you did. In my first test shoot to try them out, I used the AB shoot thru umbrella, photoflex soft box and a 250 w/s strobe shining down as a hair light. My 2 AB's were about 5 feet from my subject. At half power on all the units, I was able to shoot at 160 shutter speed at f8 aperture, at 100 film speed. I had no ambient light as it was at night, just the overhead incandescent and I shot with the nifty fifty. I used my Sekonic L358 to check the settings. Flashes were triggered using cords, someday I will get wireless.


Canon 5D with grip
50mm 1.4, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 IS 2.8L, 300mm f4, 100mm 2.8, 1.4 teleconverter, 12mm & 25mm extension tubes
Tamron 17-35 2.8-4
550EX and MR-14EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
minatophase3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
478 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Kent, WA
     
Nov 04, 2004 14:40 |  #20

daveh wrote:
minatophase3 wrote:
I will also double check my ISO settings when I get home to verify it was set at ISO 100.

That seems like a likely culprit. With a single B800, just 3 feet from the subject using a softbox, I'm reading f3.2 at ISO 100.

I just had my wife check the ISO settings and it was set to ISO 200 :shock: . So, that makes me feel a little better. Anyone have any idea on how much extra light that would allow in? Does it allow twice as much as ISO 100?

Tim


"We walk by faith, not by sight" - II Corinthians 5:7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmM
Goldmember
Avatar
5,705 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Chicago / San Francisco
     
Nov 04, 2004 14:50 |  #21

that's weird.... I have the same strobe and I get decent exposures at 1/160 f/4 - f/2.8 with the flash @ about 1/8 power (strobe into a softbox about 10ft away). I only use one strobe, 1 reflector, and the 550EX for fill light.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmM
Goldmember
Avatar
5,705 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Chicago / San Francisco
     
Nov 04, 2004 14:50 |  #22

minatophase3 wrote:
daveh wrote:
minatophase3 wrote:
I will also double check my ISO settings when I get home to verify it was set at ISO 100.

That seems like a likely culprit. With a single B800, just 3 feet from the subject using a softbox, I'm reading f3.2 at ISO 100.

I just had my wife check the ISO settings and it was set to ISO 200 :shock: . So, that makes me feel a little better. Anyone have any idea on how much extra light that would allow in? Does it allow twice as much as ISO 100?

Tim

there you go! :)

yep, twice as much




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveG
Goldmember
2,040 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
     
Nov 04, 2004 14:57 |  #23

minatophase3 wrote:
daveh wrote:
minatophase3 wrote:
I will also double check my ISO settings when I get home to verify it was set at ISO 100.

That seems like a likely culprit. With a single B800, just 3 feet from the subject using a softbox, I'm reading f3.2 at ISO 100.

I just had my wife check the ISO settings and it was set to ISO 200 :shock: . So, that makes me feel a little better. Anyone have any idea on how much extra light that would allow in? Does it allow twice as much as ISO 100?

Tim

Yes that's one stop. The difference between f4 & f5.6; or 1/125 & 1/250. That still won't make all that much difference. It's exactly the same diference by the way as the Alien Bee 400 compared to the 800.

But do your adjustments ON THE FLASH. That way you'll know that you have selected 1/16 power (or whatever) for sure.


"There's never time to do it right. But there's always time to do it over."
Canon 5D, 50D; 16-35 f2.8L, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 f1.4, 100 f2.8 Macro, 70-200 f2.8L, 300mm f2.8L IS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headcase650
Goldmember
Avatar
1,632 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Nov 04, 2004 17:41 |  #24

We are also considering getting some monolights after tax time, probably 2 900ws lights with umbrellas and heavy duty air cushoned stands. Our only lighting experiance has been with hot lights. We have been looking at the Alien Bees and the Flash Point II that Adorama sells. Our studio is a 16x12' dining room. My understanding is that I could trip a set of monolights with with the 550ex set on manual with a shutter no faster than 1/200th second. So my thought was, point the flash straight up with the catch light panel slid out,set the 550EX to manual, set the FEC as low as it would go then set up my main light and my fill at less power. Fire off a test shot to get a reading from a flash meter. then shoot accordingly. If this is correct, great, if not please tell me as I need educated befor making the purchase.

A few other questions.

If the room is lit by normal tungusten incodesent lights, (a couple 100w light bulbs in the ceiling and some on a ceiling fan behind the camera) will this affect my photos in any way, of will the flash be so bright it would drown out the yellows that tungustens put off?

I have a Sunpac Auto 355AF Thyristor flash gun just sitting around that we use to use on an old canon body that had only TTL metering. Off the camera I dont think is adjustable in any way, it just fires full power. Is there any type of flash tripped slave shoe that we could use to make this flash a background light. I was thinkg when all the others go off this one would also to get some light behind the subject. If so would you mind posting some links or tell me if this is a bad idea.

What is the differance between air cushened heavy duty stands and just the regular heavy duty stands?

If I want to use a shutter faster than 1/200th would high speed sync work , or do the pulses throw off the timing?

I hope I didnt hi-jack this thread, but sense studio flash is the topic I didnt think you all would mind.

Thanks,

Adrian


60D, Canon 18-135 IS, Sigma 10-20 hsm, 24-70 2.8 hsm, 70-200 2.8 hsm, 430EX II, and all the other stuff that goes along with it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveG
Goldmember
2,040 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
     
Nov 04, 2004 19:14 |  #25

Headcase650 wrote:
We are also considering getting some monolights after tax time, probably 2 900ws lights with umbrellas and heavy duty air cushoned stands. Our only lighting experiance has been with hot lights. We have been looking at the Alien Bees and the Flash Point II that Adorama sells. Our studio is a 16x12' dining room. My understanding is that I could trip a set of monolights with with the 550ex set on manual with a shutter no faster than 1/200th second. So my thought was, point the flash straight up with the catch light panel slid out,set the 550EX to manual, set the FEC as low as it would go then set up my main light and my fill at less power. Fire off a test shot to get a reading from a flash meter. then shoot accordingly. If this is correct, great, if not please tell me as I need educated befor making the purchase.

A few other questions.

If the room is lit by normal tungusten incodesent lights, (a couple 100w light bulbs in the ceiling and some on a ceiling fan behind the camera) will this affect my photos in any way, of will the flash be so bright it would drown out the yellows that tungustens put off?

I have a Sunpac Auto 355AF Thyristor flash gun just sitting around that we use to use on an old canon body that had only TTL metering. Off the camera I dont think is adjustable in any way, it just fires full power. Is there any type of flash tripped slave shoe that we could use to make this flash a background light. I was thinkg when all the others go off this one would also to get some light behind the subject. If so would you mind posting some links or tell me if this is a bad idea.

What is the differance between air cushened heavy duty stands and just the regular heavy duty stands?

If I want to use a shutter faster than 1/200th would high speed sync work , or do the pulses throw off the timing?

I hope I didnt hi-jack this thread, but sense studio flash is the topic I didnt think you all would mind.

Thanks,

Adrian

I don't like hot lights. They are fairly weak, yet incredibly hot and dangerous. A pair of inexpensive Alien Bees would give you a lot more power and nowhere near the danger. The easiest way to trip them is with a synch cord to one and an optical slave on the other. Low tech and works great in a private studio.

If you do use the 550 as a trigger, set it to Manual, set the power setting to 1/32 and rotate the flash head so that its aimed behind you. This should trigger the slaves in the monolights and won't affect the exposure.

You do need to get a flash meter to set up ratios with studio strobes. If you check some threads I explained how you do this. If you can't find them leave me a message and I'll write back.

Ambient light will affect your image if it's close to the flash exposure settings. If the ambient light is four stops below what you are asking your flashes to output then there should be no effect at all. But when it gets close to the same exposure good AND bad things can happen.

First the bad. If the exposure you are using with a flash is 1/60 @ f5.6 and that happens to be the ambient light in the room, you are basically making a double exposure with one shot. The first exposure is with the flash. The second is with the ambient light. The ambient light, if it's incandescent lighting, is yellow; so you might end up with a bit of a colour cast. 1/60 of a second doesn't freeze action very well so you might get some subject movement in the image as well. Then you superimpose the flash shot on top of this. The flash shot is daylight balanced so there's no colour cast. Electronic flash is also very very brief. On Manual most electronic flash's "flash duration" is about 1/700 of a second. On automatic setttings the duration will be much shorter, in the 1/10,000 of a second (or shorter) range. The flash will then freeze the action. When you look at the image you will see a nice short "blue" image with a yellow ghost image with visible movement where the subject moved.

Now the good news is that you can use this technique to give you some very useful shots. I use this at weddings all the time. Put the camera on a tripod so there's no camera movement. Brief the subject to stand very still and not to move after the flash pop. Meter the ambient light (say 1/15 @ f5.6). Set your camera to that and shoot. You still get the "double exposure" but since the subject didn't move you see no ghosting. You also don't get any flash fall off - that's the black behind most flash shots since the ambient light fills it in. This technique has many names & I call it dragging the shutter or inside fill flash. It works great for this. It sucks if you try it when the B&G are walking down the aisle.

You could probably get a hotshoe looking slave that the Sunpak flash could slide into. The you need to get it onto a small stand of some kind. I use Minolta table top tripods for that kkind of thing.

You cannot use shutterspeed faster than 1/200 with a 10D and conventional flashes. If you do you will shoot "off synch" and ruin the image. It's the way that the shutter actually works. The shutter is made up of two curtains. The first one fires and goes across the folcal plane. When it gets to the end the second curtain fires and closes the focal plane. Now that's what happens at shutterspeeds below the synch speed - 1/200 in the 10D, 1/250 in the 20D. At speeds faster than 1/200 the first curtain fires and then BEFORE it reaches the end of the focal plane the second one fires and chases it. As the shutterspeeds get shorter the opening of this "slit" will become smaller and at 1/4000 a tiny slit will fly across the focal plane. If you use a conventional flash above the synch speed you are photographing part of the shutter too, and this sucks.

Now there is a "high speed" synch available with the 550EX and is obviously possible, but it produces a fairly weak flash output. All those mini pops are powered by the same capacitor so that only way you can get two pops is if they are no more than half the full power, right? So many, many pops are perhaps 1/16 or 1/32 of full power, which is weak indeed. So you subject better be really close.

And on top of this it's very hard on your flash. Pop, pop, pop times 50 and you've got a very hot little flash tube. I can remember taking a Metz flash, touching the flash face to a piece of newsprint and after the flash was fired watched a small bit of smoke curl to the ceiling! There is real heat coming out of these things. Not enough to burn you but enough to ruin the flash if you aren't careful.

Air cushioned stands do what they imply. If the aren't completely tightened and the tightener fails, it will lower the stands slowly as it pumps out air. The "heavy duty" stands will just collapse and the jar from the sudden stop could damage the monolight or cause the stand to fall over.


"There's never time to do it right. But there's always time to do it over."
Canon 5D, 50D; 16-35 f2.8L, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 f1.4, 100 f2.8 Macro, 70-200 f2.8L, 300mm f2.8L IS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headcase650
Goldmember
Avatar
1,632 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Nov 04, 2004 19:50 |  #26

DaveG,

Thank you so very much, that helped me a ton.

I dont believe the Digital Rebel has a place to plug a sync cord into, so I guess I'll use the 550. Ill need to do some research on the hotshoe slave also.

I know the hotlights are hot and are a pain sometimes but we have gotten some awesome results using them. With the two 500w with umbrells and the 100w light on the ceiling that we use they arent super bright so we set the iso to 400 and get around 1/200th shutter at f 2.8 or 3.5. Currently we are using the 50/1.8 and the 28/2.8 for all our in studio shots. If we are doing a kid that just doesnt ant to stand still we will under expose by a stop or maybe a little more and pring it back in photoshop.

Another question, How long do flash tubes last, Ive noticed that they start arounf 50 bucks and just go up. Ive made my $6 500w photofloods last almost a year LOL.


60D, Canon 18-135 IS, Sigma 10-20 hsm, 24-70 2.8 hsm, 70-200 2.8 hsm, 430EX II, and all the other stuff that goes along with it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveG
Goldmember
2,040 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
     
Nov 04, 2004 20:08 |  #27

Headcase650 wrote:
DaveG,

Thank you so very much, that helped me a ton.

I dont believe the Digital Rebel has a place to plug a sync cord into, so I guess I'll use the 550. Ill need to do some research on the hotshoe slave also.

I know the hotlights are hot and are a pain sometimes but we have gotten some awesome results using them. With the two 500w with umbrells and the 100w light on the ceiling that we use they arent super bright so we set the iso to 400 and get around 1/200th shutter at f 2.8 or 3.5. Currently we are using the 50/1.8 and the 28/2.8 for all our in studio shots. If we are doing a kid that just doesnt ant to stand still we will under expose by a stop or maybe a little more and pring it back in photoshop.

Another question, How long do flash tubes last, Ive noticed that they start arounf 50 bucks and just go up. Ive made my $6 500w photofloods last almost a year LOL.

You can get a Wein Safe synch that slides into your hotshoe and provides a safe (duh) synch terminal.

Flash tubes will last for many years as long as they aren't abused. I've had my Multiblitz monolights for about 10 years now and they were at least 20 years old THEN! And I still haven't changed a flash tube!


"There's never time to do it right. But there's always time to do it over."
Canon 5D, 50D; 16-35 f2.8L, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 f1.4, 100 f2.8 Macro, 70-200 f2.8L, 300mm f2.8L IS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
minatophase3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
478 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Kent, WA
     
Nov 04, 2004 21:57 |  #28

It Was Just User Error!

I am happy to report that the AB800's will be staying right where they are. :D

When I got home I set them up again, this time with the ISO on the camera turned to 100 and I was able to get some nice shots, even at 2.8 aperature!!! I had one AB800 with the 48" brolly box about 4 feet away from my wife and was still able to use 2.8, so I am convinced that these will work very nicely!!

I also turned the silver/white umbrella to the white side and that seemed to help some also.

Thanks to everyone for their guidance on this issue. I think I would have been very disappointed it I exchanged them for the AB400's.

Now, I will do my best to post some pictures this weekend!

Tim


"We walk by faith, not by sight" - II Corinthians 5:7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris.bailey
Goldmember
2,061 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
     
Nov 05, 2004 01:26 |  #29

where you set the brolly in relation to the flash tube can make a big difference. You really want the flash to fill the brolly, too close and it can make hotspots in the reflected light, too far and you are spilling some backwards.

Though my units are Bowens, I found that it took a while for the flash output to become consistent, kind of like a burn in period. that may also be a factor.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

15,877 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
AlienBees are too Powerful!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2455 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.