Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Mar 2008 (Wednesday) 09:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Dark frame noise comparison

 
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Mar 19, 2008 09:12 |  #1

Interesting comparison between 40D, 20D, 350D, 1DM3 and D300. Makes the Nikon look like dirt. Only one sample, but still....
http://forums.dpreview​.com …orum=1019&threa​d=27227926 (external link)


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adamora
Who said i want a title? :(
Avatar
4,742 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Dubai
     
Mar 19, 2008 09:18 |  #2

tzalman wrote in post #5146821 (external link)
Interesting comparison between 40D, 20D, 350D, 1DM3 and D300. Makes the Nikon look like dirt. Only one sample, but still....
http://forums.dpreview​.com …orum=1019&threa​d=27227926 (external link)

Please dont call nikon "dirt", This forum does not have the rule "All Nikons SUCK"

Anyway, thats a good comparision. But they left out the d3?!


[Adam]
[100D][Nifty Fifty]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Mar 19, 2008 11:34 |  #3

I didn't call it dirt. I said this comparison makes it look like dirt. There is a difference. Besides, this is only in reference to ISO 1600 noise. I'm sure the D300 has many other fine features.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adamora
Who said i want a title? :(
Avatar
4,742 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Dubai
     
Mar 19, 2008 12:04 |  #4

tzalman wrote in post #5147704 (external link)
I didn't call it dirt. I said this comparison makes it look like dirt. There is a difference. Besides, this is only in reference to ISO 1600 noise. I'm sure the D300 has many other fine features.

Oh i see, forgive me.


[Adam]
[100D][Nifty Fifty]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,544 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Dark frame noise comparison
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1096 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.