Can you help me understand depth of field?
Hi markubig
While Sam North posted his reply, I wrote another one. They don't seem to contradict each other, but different wording might help to understand. And there it goes:
Any camera depicts sharply only what is in the focal plane, the plane in the currently set focal distance from the camera. From this plane, sharpness decreases steadily towards the camera and away from it. So in theory, there is not really any DOF.
But it is common practice to agree on a rather arbitrary distance closer than the focal plane and a distance beyond it where a still acceptable sharpness changes to unacceptable. This is not a distinct point, but an arbitrarily selected point on a sliding, tapering degradation. The distance (or range) between the two selected points is defined as DOF.
The DOF depends on many aspects: current focal length and aperture of the lens as well as the focal distance. Then it depends too on your own requirements – casual shots on 4x6in prints or any higher or even professional work. All this goes into known formulas to calculate the DOF.
In the field, there is no easy way to know or even estimate the DOF in any given situation. With the Canon G's – as applies to you and me – there is no way at all to even know the current focal length (apart from min/max) or the focal distance (apart from the crude "manual" scale) – Canon decided not to tell us.
So we have to make do with rules of thumb such as:
- "the DOF gets bigger with smaller apertures (bigger f numbers, eg. f8 ) and/or shorter focal length (towards wide angle)"
- "for smaller DOF use bigger apertures (smaller f numbers, eg. f2) and/or longer focal length (towards tele setting)"
- "one third of DOF lies towards the camera and two thirds beyond the focal distance"
- "for landscapes don't focus on infinity, but on something much closer"
Apart from the DOF, there is the concept of the "Hyperfocal distance" or HFD. This is the focal distance where the DOF begins at half the HFD and reaches to infinity. Or, if you set the focal distance to half the HFD, then the DOF reaches from about a third of the HFD to HFD. But the HFD depends entirely on the DOF concept and the knowledge of the current focal length and aperture.
Digicams are said to have a rather big DOF compared to conventional ones. The theory is diffuse, but apparent sharpness definitely is increased by the customary sharpening of digital pictures, while unsharpened ones as a rule are rather soft.
If you want to know more (or "all") about DOF and HFD, go here
. But it's probably more than most people want to know
flowe 