gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.  57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Mar 21, 2008 11:15 | #16 tma888 wrote in post #5160082  seriously, how do you take pictures with the 1dmk3 + 70-200 2.8 is with ONE hand? jedi you must be! teach me you, must! Big big hands. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewHicksPhotography Goldmember  2,552 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada More info | Mar 21, 2008 11:28 | #17 cneville101 wrote in post #5161200 I don't want to rain on your parade, but it appears that both the duck picture and the rabbit picture are OOF. The subjects in both pictures appear to be a bit soft, and the grass in front of the animals is in sharp focus - I don't know if this indicates a front focusing problem or operator error? That's probably just him trying to handhold the camera and the 70-200 F/2.8 with one hand Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timmyeatchips Senior Member  336 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Newcastle, UK More info | Mar 21, 2008 11:40 | #18 tma888 wrote in post #5160082 seriously, how do you take pictures with the 1dmk3 + 70-200 2.8 is with ONE hand? jedi you must be! teach me you, must! That's a well exercised wrist... =D Canon EOS 450D | Canon 18-55mm, 55-250mm, 50mm | 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 21, 2008 16:50 | #19 Thanks guys. It's probably just me. 1.3 does have a bit less dof compared to 1.6. -Derek 40D, 5D, 5D MK II, 1D Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 21, 2008 20:39 | #20 What is the deal with the xxx serial number? Its ridiculous. I right clicked on your jpeg, viewed the EXIF data, and presto, I have the serial number of your 30D that you took the first picture with. Now that I have it, what could I seriously do with it!! 7D, 5D MKIII, 17-40 f/4L, 24-70 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/2.8L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xII, 2.0xII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 21, 2008 20:51 | #21 adamsti wrote in post #5164301 What is the deal with the xxx serial number? Its ridiculous. I right clicked on your jpeg, viewed the EXIF data, and presto, I have the serial number of your 30D that you took the first picture with. Now that I have it, what could I seriously do with it!! Serial # of the MKIII is also available via your EXIF data. He's just saying that his new MkIII is within the updated range which should have the AF issues rectified. Fresh from Canon with serial 56xxxx Dusty
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 21, 2008 21:09 | #22 Dusty wrote in post #5164359 He's just saying that his new MkIII is within the updated range which should have the AF issues rectified. Makes it easier to read the post IMO. I have seen this hundreds of times in all the photo forums, talking about all types of cameras. Serial #'s are xxx out. There is no reason for this. 7D, 5D MKIII, 17-40 f/4L, 24-70 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/2.8L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xII, 2.0xII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Az2Africa Goldmember  3,481 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2005 Location: North Scottsdale, Arizona USA More info | Mar 21, 2008 21:38 | #23 Enjoy your new camera! "If you're not living on the edge. You're taking up too much room !"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DVS_WiNdz Cream of the Crop 9,835 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: New York, NY More info | Mar 21, 2008 22:16 | #24 |
thatkatmat Cream of the Crop  9,342 posts Gallery: 41 photos Likes: 205 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold More info | Mar 21, 2008 22:26 | #25 adamsti wrote in post #5164438 I have seen this hundreds of times in all the photo forums, talking about all types of cameras. Serial #'s are xxx out. There is no reason for this. With the mkIII's it certainly is applicable, not only to differentiate it from the effected serial numbers but some also believe that the latest bodies are having better performance than the non effected but middle of the road serial numbers. i don't know if there's any real evidence of this being true but for those who are paranoid about it, it is a question. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
numbersix fully entitled to be jealous  8,964 posts Likes: 109 Joined May 2007 Location: SF Bay Area More info | Mar 22, 2008 13:45 | #26 adamsti wrote in post #5164438 I have seen this hundreds of times in all the photo forums, talking about all types of cameras. Serial #'s are xxx out. There is no reason for this. Well, I understand what you mean anyway. I do wonder what security issue is involved - can't think of any reason not to post a complete serial number. As you say, it's in the EXIF anyway... "Be seeing you."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Mar 22, 2008 13:54 | #27 Congrats on the MK III! I wouldn't worry about it too much regarding the AF. My MK III is pre-blue dot and it's working flawlessly after the fix. Enjoy the new toy!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheGaffer Member 204 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2007 More info | Mar 22, 2008 14:57 | #28 Rellik wrote in post #5160039 A mandatory duck!
It's looking a little soft to me...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
numbersix fully entitled to be jealous 8,964 posts Likes: 109 Joined May 2007 Location: SF Bay Area More info | Mar 22, 2008 16:18 | #29 Send it back to Canon! "Be seeing you."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
prolepsis Mostly Lurking 13 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Canada More info |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1772 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
