pcasciola wrote:
If Canon is listening, WE NEED A 10MM OR 12MM PRIME, NOW!!! L would be nice, too
If Canon is listening, WE NEED A 10MM OR 12MM PRIME, NOW!!! L would be nice, too
10mm f1,4 L please!
J.
-
DeeplyDigital Senior Member  270 posts Joined Jun 2004 Location: Dublino - IE More info | Nov 07, 2004 15:40 | #16 pcasciola wrote: If Canon is listening, WE NEED A 10MM OR 12MM PRIME, NOW!!! L would be nice, too 10mm f1,4 L please!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kenski Senior Member 724 posts Joined Aug 2004 Location: Va Beach, Va More info | Nov 08, 2004 08:49 | #17  Permanent banpcasciola wrote: Actually, I just did some measuring and calculations, and it looks the field of view after running PTLens is about the same as a 12mm prime, so that may be a decent way to get straight ultra wide out of a fisheye if you can live with the loss of resolution in the corners. With a 20D, it will probably still be plenty of resolution for a small print. Thanks for pointing it out.
[highlight]40D, 30D, 300D 10-22mm 15mm 17-40mm 24-70mm 50mm 60mm 70-200 IS, 100-400 IS[/highlight]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2565 guests, 94 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
