Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 23 Mar 2008 (Sunday) 22:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Good image size for the web?

 
dakota367
Member
108 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Cameron Park, Ca
     
Mar 23, 2008 22:32 |  #1

Im using a 40D and I am uploading my images as jpegs to gallery2, what is an appropriate images size and quality.

Thanks,
Dakota Knutson


DKP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
dakota367
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
108 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Cameron Park, Ca
     
Mar 23, 2008 22:38 |  #2

no ideas...


DKP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dakota367
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
108 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Cameron Park, Ca
     
Mar 23, 2008 23:23 |  #3

bump?


DKP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrew748
Goldmember
Avatar
1,365 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Surrey
     
Mar 23, 2008 23:24 |  #4

what's gallery 2?

do they have an faq?

for here i like to keep to 800 x 600


www.andrew748.com (external link)
drawers full of slightly mouldy Leica kit, a couple of newish Japanese bits, nearly every cheap Chinese flash modifying toy ever sold on ebay and sooooo many batteries the TSA have me on a no fly list ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,920 posts
Likes: 333
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Mar 23, 2008 23:30 |  #5

Geez have some patience. Try 1000x666, or 500x333 if you don't want people to make a good print from the web. Keep files around 100kb if you can.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xairsoft808x
Member
192 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Mar 24, 2008 00:12 |  #6

tim wrote in post #5177795 (external link)
Geez have some patience. Try 1000x666, or 500x333 if you don't want people to make a good print from the web. Keep files around 100kb if you can.

wow really 100kb? hmm i guess i could compress my stuff more huh?


-Chad

Gear Bag
My Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,920 posts
Likes: 333
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Mar 24, 2008 00:18 |  #7

Well maybe a bit more for 1000 pixels wide. Just keep it small enough that it downloads reasonably quickly. The easiest way to reduce file size is to include less pixels in the image.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ved
Junior Member
20 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Mar 24, 2008 03:20 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #8

You could opt for the bigger and include a watermark too, if it's for potential buyers?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xairsoft808x
Member
192 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Mar 24, 2008 03:29 |  #9

well yeah i do put the pics up for purchase on smug so i ve been compressing to ~500kb


-Chad

Gear Bag
My Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,920 posts
Likes: 333
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Mar 24, 2008 03:58 |  #10

If they're going to be printed then that's an entirely different scenario.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
Avatar
2,585 posts
Gallery: 169 photos
Likes: 743
Joined Oct 2006
Location: uk
     
Mar 24, 2008 05:19 |  #11

dakota367 wrote in post #5177521 (external link)
Im using a 40D and I am uploading my images as jpegs to gallery2, what is an appropriate images size and quality.

Thanks,
Dakota Knutson

If they are right click protected (smugmug pro) then hurl them up as big as you like. You're unlikely to run out of space. If you are worried about people "stealing" them off your site/host then go 640x480 at around 100mb. Or even watermark them if you are really concerned.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,920 posts
Likes: 333
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Mar 24, 2008 05:38 |  #12

If someone can see something they can print it. Well, I can. Watermarks are the most effective way I think.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_B
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,032 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 916
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawaii
     
Mar 24, 2008 06:38 |  #13

dakota367,
Of course its up to you :)

I personally have my photos around 600 x 400px which on average looks like a 4 x 6" on monitors. Any larger and people with low resolution monitors or slow internet connections (yes they still exist) will suffer. Also larger files are easier to print and break copyright laws.

I agree with tim in that watermarks/signatures are the best way to protect your photos. Sites like SmugMug are easy to steal photos by just turning off javascript setting in your internet browser.


Sony A6500, A6000, Lenses, DMC-ZS40 & Apeman A80 <-- click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Mar 24, 2008 09:26 |  #14

A real "how long is a piece of string"?" question.

It depends on what you're shooting, what your intentions for your Gallery are, how it is laid out, who the target audience is... and so on.

You might also want to look at the forum rules about bumping messages...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,537 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Mar 24, 2008 10:02 |  #15

If they are right click protected (smugmug pro) then hurl them up as big as you like

I wouldn't recommended relying on this. Try "Print Screen" with a full size image from Smug. Paste into CS3 and crop out the image. See what you end up with. The image left is very usable.

Upload full size to Smug and water mark them. Smug will grey out certain quality prints if there isn't an image that will print in that quality. For instance if you just upload a low res image and somebody wants to buy a large print or large digital download, they will not be able to.


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,774 views & 0 likes for this thread
Good image size for the web?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is shaikh
792 guests, 282 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.