Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 26 Mar 2008 (Wednesday) 12:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

how noticable is 1/2 pound?

 
gardengirl13
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: US
     
Mar 26, 2008 12:30 |  #1

I'm thinking of downgrading my 30D to one of the rebels due to the weight of the camera. How noticable is the weight for those who have used both?


photos (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205171

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Riff ­ Raff
Goldmember
Avatar
1,111 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
     
Mar 26, 2008 12:32 |  #2

I noticed the size difference - not so much the weight difference. Of course, I'd had almost a year by that time to get used to the weight of Digital Rebel+Grip+24-70mm f/2.8L.

EDIT: Oh, you're wanting to go in the opposite direction. The Rebel seems very small now (as does the viewfinder), but I don't really think much about the weight difference.


Shawn McHorse - Shawn.McHorse.com (external link) / AustinRocky.org (external link)
DSLR: 5D Mark III Compact: S100 Flash: 580EX II Bag: Tamrac Rally 5
Lenses: 16-35mm f/2.8L II, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS,
50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 26, 2008 12:33 |  #3

1/2 lb is about what my bracket weighs. It's nothing.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gardengirl13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: US
     
Mar 26, 2008 12:35 |  #4

That's what I worry about. The weight is bothering me (health problems) and I can't bring myself to downgrade to a P&S as my only camera. After 30 minutes of shooting with my 30D and 100 macro I had to rest. It's depressing the crap out of me.


photos (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205171

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 26, 2008 12:36 |  #5

Yeah when I went from XT to 30D it was the size and ergonomics that impressed me. The weight didn't even enter my mind.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elader
Goldmember
Avatar
2,374 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Mar 26, 2008 12:37 |  #6

the xt series is teenie weenie - size is much smaller, and i couldnt live without the wheel.


Eric
FJR1300 rider
5D mkIII and 1D MkIII

16-35L | 24-105L | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 85 f/1.8 / 50 f.1,4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gardengirl13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: US
     
Mar 26, 2008 12:40 |  #7

Well the size would still be better then a P&S, it's not the size it's how much it weighs. I need something lighter.


photos (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205171

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Mar 26, 2008 12:43 |  #8

I have no idea what lenses you use, but the 35mm f/2.0 and XTi would be a very lightweight combination. Most of the time it's the lenses that cause fatigue, not the body itself.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Mar 26, 2008 12:43 |  #9

I think the XTi's are noticeably smaller & lighter than a 30D; its not a huge difference at first but after a little while it might become more noticeable.. Have you considered moving from the 100 Macro to the 60? The 60 is about half the size of the 100. Might make more of a difference than switching the body.

IMAGE: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Macro-Lenses-Comparison.jpg

From this review. (external link)

connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Riff ­ Raff
Goldmember
Avatar
1,111 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
     
Mar 26, 2008 13:15 |  #10

Aye, if you're wanting weight savings I think much more about the lenses involved. I've used the 50mm f/1.4 at times specifically because I wanted to give my hands a break. Light lenses make a lot of difference.


Shawn McHorse - Shawn.McHorse.com (external link) / AustinRocky.org (external link)
DSLR: 5D Mark III Compact: S100 Flash: 580EX II Bag: Tamrac Rally 5
Lenses: 16-35mm f/2.8L II, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS,
50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HighLife
Senior Member
Avatar
661 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Coral Springs, FL
     
Mar 26, 2008 13:32 |  #11

Get a half of pound of Boars head pepper Ham at your local Grocery store....emm...Boars head.

That way, you can tell approx how much 1/2 pound is and you have LUNCH!!


Canon 590IS/CHDKMy Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Mar 26, 2008 14:52 |  #12

What about a better shoulder strap, or a harness that distributes the weight more?


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elader
Goldmember
Avatar
2,374 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Mar 26, 2008 14:53 |  #13

XTi and the 60mm macro is a pretty light combo for sure.


Eric
FJR1300 rider
5D mkIII and 1D MkIII

16-35L | 24-105L | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 85 f/1.8 / 50 f.1,4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Mar 26, 2008 15:12 |  #14

i'de suggest hitting the gym if the camera weighs too much... to be honest, i got used to a 1d with 70-200 and now i can't seem to hold a rebel level anymore... you'll see it's harder to shoot with a lighter body when it's that small

edit: for those who do not like light humor, the point is that you get used to cameras weight after a few weeks of repetition, as you learn how to work around problems (like handholding a 300mm means holding it up for a few seconds at a time, then letting it slack when not needed, or getting a monopod instead of handholding)


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Mar 26, 2008 15:13 |  #15

^ It's not a strength issue. ;)


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,727 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
how noticable is 1/2 pound?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1375 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.