Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 27 Mar 2008 (Thursday) 10:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Chrystie & Jonathan

 
whoopsjenny
Member
Avatar
112 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Western, PA
     
Mar 27, 2008 10:12 |  #1

These are a few engagement pics I did free for a couple yesterday! Any CC is greatly appreciated. thanks!


IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/chrystie1.jpg
IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/chrystie2.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whoopsjenny
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
112 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Western, PA
     
Mar 27, 2008 10:13 |  #2

IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/chrystie3.jpg

IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/chrystie4.jpg

IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/chrystie5.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tobiah
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sale , Manchester ,UK
     
Mar 27, 2008 10:24 |  #3

way too overprocessed. you lost too much details in her face and gave her panda eyes


[URL="http://[URL]www.​tobiahtayo.com/"][SIZE​=2][COLOR=darkorange] [Blog] Various canon gear....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AaronNCSU
Member
115 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
     
Mar 27, 2008 11:21 |  #4

Composition wise, I feel like the first one (top left) is not quit an engagement shot. A couple back to back doesn't convey an emotion of love to me. Also, I don't feel like the guy is all that excited in the first few shots. Other than the post processing, the last one is my favorite because they both look relaxed and like they are having fun.


Aaron
www.beautifulfrenzy.co (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
axe
Member
Avatar
56 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
     
Mar 27, 2008 11:32 |  #5

I agree with Tobiah. Maybe if just one of them was processed for 'that look' but not all of them.

I like the poses and backgrounds. Good job taking the photos.


Axe
Canon Mark II N, & 30D, Canon glass 28-300 3.5-5.6 IS L, 70-200 2.8, 17-55 2.8, 580EX
I never stop learning about this business.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lelasmama05
Senior Member
Avatar
806 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Mar 27, 2008 12:58 |  #6

Definitely too PP... I would have liked to have seen the actual pictures.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flipstyle72
Goldmember
2,318 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Mar 27, 2008 13:02 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

Although I DO like the PP, especially in #2...I personally wouldn't do them all to that degree. Unless of course, they request them like that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
auroraskye
Goldmember
Avatar
2,445 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Plano, TX
     
Mar 27, 2008 14:08 |  #8

Too much processing.


I am super cool n' stuff.
http://www.brandithomp​sonphotography.com (external link)
Like Me On Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whoopsjenny
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
112 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Western, PA
     
Mar 27, 2008 15:04 |  #9

Here are some on the opposite end of the spectrum! Does anyone have any suggestions on how to make them pop without over doing it?? Thanks!


IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/1-1.jpg

IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/4-1.jpg

IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/3-1.jpg

IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/2-3.jpg

IMAGE: http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e127/whoopsjenny/5-1.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flipstyle72
Goldmember
2,318 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Mar 27, 2008 16:46 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Here ya go, I played with one before leaving work...

auto adjusted levels, contrast
boosted saturation a tiny bit
cropped off negative space over head
added a hint of vignetting

I tried to sharpen it a bit, but it messed it up. I guess maybe on the original file or if you shot it RAW it would work better.

Anyways, that's how I saw it...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texasreddirt
Senior Member
472 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2007
     
Mar 28, 2008 12:44 |  #11

Did you shoot them in RAW? If so boost the color saturation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lil_miss
Goldmember
Avatar
4,075 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Auckland, NZ
     
Mar 28, 2008 17:29 |  #12

you need some fill flash to remove the darkness of her eyes.. you can barely see them


A bunch of Canon bits and pieces.

Blog (external link) :: Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S-S
frustrating simple something
Avatar
8,755 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
     
Mar 29, 2008 00:25 as a reply to  @ lil_miss's post |  #13

ok i see the piggyback shot working like this: (ignore obvious jpeg artifacting from compression)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shooting
Goldmember
Avatar
1,552 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2008
     
Mar 30, 2008 20:09 |  #14

Yes, fill flash needed to fill in the eyes. The first one of them back to back a little too underexposed..lighting is too flat. But I do like the pose.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
silvex
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,313 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 55
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Southern California, USA
     
Apr 04, 2008 19:40 |  #15

Ditto to many comments. Specially the fill ffor the eyes ( way too dark) I also not fond of the PP and the colors seem off.


.
-Ed
CPS Platinum Member.
Canon Gear
SilvexPhoto.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,820 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Chrystie & Jonathan
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is bzguy
1448 guests, 187 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.