http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/5255/img0381dpx6.jpg
BrownDogWilson Goldmember 1,456 posts Likes: 286 Joined Aug 2006 More info | Mar 28, 2008 03:25 | #1 http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/5255/img0381dpx6.jpg 1DX, 1D MarkIV, 5D MarkIII, 70-200mm 2.8., 400mm 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 17-40, 15mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ManOverBoard Junior Member 24 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: N.E. Florida More info | Mar 28, 2008 09:25 | #2 nice crisp shots! good action.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bigjon0107 Senior Member 897 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Texas More info | Mar 28, 2008 10:05 | #3 You should brighten up the images some, remember that the surfer is your subject and you need to expose mainly for him/her Jon Eilts
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sometimes the surfer could be secondary to the wave, don't you think? If they were any brighter I would probably get slammed for the white being to blown out 1DX, 1D MarkIV, 5D MarkIII, 70-200mm 2.8., 400mm 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 17-40, 15mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bigjon0107 Senior Member 897 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Texas More info | Mar 28, 2008 10:55 | #5 BrownDogWilson wrote in post #5209600 Sometimes the surfer could be secondary to the wave, don't you think? If they were any brighter I would probably get slammed for the white being to blown out To an extent, but i don't see how the surfer can be completely secondary to the wave...if that were the case, there would be no point in finding a competition, just go to the beach and shoot some waves. But some of them are underexposed to the point that you are staring to loose detail on the face...not good. Jon Eilts
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I totally agree mostly,,hahaha....Maybe my monitor is lighter than yours because I can see their faces clearly....I was shooting against the sun though so that didn't help much,,,Thanks for the comments! 1DX, 1D MarkIV, 5D MarkIII, 70-200mm 2.8., 400mm 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 17-40, 15mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beano Goldmember  4,168 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2006 Location: Berkshire. UK More info | Apr 06, 2008 06:58 | #7 You could try playing with multiple exposures and merging them Browndog, admittedly not an easy task with this subject though. Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
@nt!x Member  196 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Sandy, Utah More info | Apr 07, 2008 09:10 | #8 Great shots! http://flickr.com/photos/hamsgod/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JSJR4 Senior Member  977 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Apr 07, 2008 13:11 | #9 cool shots. where were these taken? D200: 10.5DX2.8 fisheye: 17-55DX2.8: 70-200VR2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cgross Senior Member 320 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Iowa USA More info | Apr 12, 2008 13:19 | #10 Tack sharp good job 40D|24-70 f4L|70-200 f4L|85 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paddleout Member  143 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Melbourne, FL More info | Apr 12, 2008 13:49 | #11 BrownDogWilson wrote in post #5209600 Sometimes the surfer could be secondary to the wave, don't you think? If they were any brighter I would probably get slammed for the white being to blown out  Nice shots, Like the water action on that last one. Feel your pain on the backlit... just did a whole thread about it. Canon 5d MKII, 40d gripped - Canon 70-200mm 2.8 L IS, 50mm ,85mm, Sigma 2.8, Tamron 17-35 2.8, etc.. Adobe Master Collection CS5.5, Lightroom 3.0, Canon XH-A1 Video
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2693 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
