Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 28 Mar 2008 (Friday) 13:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Recently converted to infrared: noisy and OOF

 
forsakenme720
Senior Member
Avatar
910 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Mar 28, 2008 13:22 |  #1

So I just got my camera back from life pixel today and I'm having some issues. All my photos I've taken are much noisier than they should be (at ISO 100) Is this normal? And my shots with my wide angle lens are OOF. I was really excited and now I'm really disappointed. I don't know what to do. Here's a 100% center crop sample. It was shot at 17mm, f11 and 100 ISO.

Edit: I should also add that this was shot on a tripod and the camera I had converted was my Rebel XT.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Cameras: Canon 20D, Canon Rebel XT (converted to infrared)
Lenses: Canon 17-40mm f4L; Tamron 28-75mm f2.8; Canon 10-22mm f3.5-4.5; Canon 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro; Canon 85mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lionstone
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Houston, TX
     
Mar 28, 2008 16:20 |  #2

Your camera will behave very differently with the converstion; auto-focus, exposure, etc, are all calibrated with the normal high-pass filter in place. Which conversion did you have done? Normal IR, full-spectrum, ... ?


Rebel XT
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS USM
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
Speedlite 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Mar 28, 2008 17:16 as a reply to  @ Lionstone's post |  #3

Yes, this is pretty normal, there is a learning curve that you will need to go through to shoot IR.

In particular, IR is very different to visible light, particularly in the wavelength so you need to adjust the focus to suit. Some lenses have a red IR mark by the focus scale to aid in IR focusing, it used to be on almost all lenses but modern lenses often leave it off unfortunately. If you have it, focus normally and read off the distance showing at the normal focus mark, then (using manual focus) turn the focus ring until that distance lines up with the IR mark, focusing should now be correct for IR with that shot.

IR does often look noisy, but this is generally acceptable as it frequently complements the other-worldly look of the other IR attributes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rubberhead
Goldmember
Avatar
1,899 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry
     
Mar 28, 2008 17:32 |  #4

I seem to remember that you've got to manually focus when shooting IR. I think there's an IR scale on most Canon lens.


EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
forsakenme720
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
910 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Mar 28, 2008 23:37 |  #5

Lionstone wrote in post #5212082 (external link)
Your camera will behave very differently with the converstion; auto-focus, exposure, etc, are all calibrated with the normal high-pass filter in place. Which conversion did you have done? Normal IR, full-spectrum, ... ?

I just have the normal IR filter. So is there no way to get it sharp then? Because I've seen plenty of sharp infrared images, particularly samples at life pixel, that are wide angle. So far, my shots seem sharp enough with my 28-75mm, but just not with the 10-20. Thanks for your help.

Dave


Cameras: Canon 20D, Canon Rebel XT (converted to infrared)
Lenses: Canon 17-40mm f4L; Tamron 28-75mm f2.8; Canon 10-22mm f3.5-4.5; Canon 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro; Canon 85mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
forsakenme720
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
910 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Mar 28, 2008 23:39 as a reply to  @ forsakenme720's post |  #6

@ sandpiper and rubberhead - when you get your camera converted, the focus is adjusted so that auto-focus still works correctly. I appreciate your help though.

Dave


Cameras: Canon 20D, Canon Rebel XT (converted to infrared)
Lenses: Canon 17-40mm f4L; Tamron 28-75mm f2.8; Canon 10-22mm f3.5-4.5; Canon 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro; Canon 85mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
forsakenme720
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
910 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Mar 28, 2008 23:43 as a reply to  @ forsakenme720's post |  #7

Here's another weird thing I don't get, I used the wide angle to shoot an object up close and that shot is properly in focus. So far it's only the wide landscape shots...


Cameras: Canon 20D, Canon Rebel XT (converted to infrared)
Lenses: Canon 17-40mm f4L; Tamron 28-75mm f2.8; Canon 10-22mm f3.5-4.5; Canon 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro; Canon 85mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
forsakenme720
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
910 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Mar 28, 2008 23:48 as a reply to  @ forsakenme720's post |  #8

Okay, I took some more earlier and now I have some landscapes that are sharp. There definitely is a lot to this that I'm gonna have to figure out.

@ Lionstone - if you have any tips for me, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.

Dave


Cameras: Canon 20D, Canon Rebel XT (converted to infrared)
Lenses: Canon 17-40mm f4L; Tamron 28-75mm f2.8; Canon 10-22mm f3.5-4.5; Canon 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro; Canon 85mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lionstone
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Houston, TX
     
Mar 30, 2008 18:28 |  #9

forsakenme720 wrote in post #5214848 (external link)
Okay, I took some more earlier and now I have some landscapes that are sharp. There definitely is a lot to this that I'm gonna have to figure out.

@ Lionstone - if you have any tips for me, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.

Dave

Just get used to adjusting your shots. :)
I know LifePixel does their best to recalibrate your camera, but IR is still tricky. The focus won't be right at all focal lengths, and the metering will be off a lot of the time. I don't do a lot of infrared (I borrow a modified camera now and then), but I find myself dialing in positive exposure compensation on just about every shot, and I finally learned how to use the exposure bracketing function, too. :) Be sure to use a tripod.

There's nothing you can do about the noise except Noise Ninja (or whatever) if it bothers you on a particular shot.

Good luck!


Rebel XT
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS USM
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
Speedlite 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mzivtins
Goldmember
Avatar
1,025 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Mar 30, 2008 19:13 as a reply to  @ Lionstone's post |  #10

how do they adjust the AF for the frequency of IR?

i think that is out, if you buy an 'L' it will come with the IR focus points on the scale (also on some nice non L lenses too)

i say shoot everything in manual :D


http://www.mzivtins.co​.uk (external link)
http://www.glidingshee​p.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 298
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
     
Mar 30, 2008 19:15 |  #11

mzivtins wrote in post #5226272 (external link)
how do they adjust the AF for the frequency of IR?

They don't. You focus manually.


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lionstone
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Houston, TX
     
Mar 30, 2008 19:39 |  #12

I was positive that LifePixel re-calibrated the AF for you. I looked it up just now:
http://www.lifepixel.c​om …eautofocusworkf​orinfrared (external link)

They do re-calibrate, but it's for a particular lens at a particular f-stop. Which explains why it's off most of the time regardless. :)


Rebel XT
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS USM
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
Speedlite 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris_arnet
Senior Member
Avatar
444 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
     
Mar 30, 2008 20:00 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

forsakenme720 wrote in post #5214796 (external link)
@ sandpiper and rubberhead - when you get your camera converted, the focus is adjusted so that auto-focus still works correctly. I appreciate your help though.

Dave

They calibrate it to a nifty fifty, yes. And noise is perfectly normal. Since IR is almost always landscape, photogs just shoot with a small aperture to compensate the focus difference.


Canon 60D | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 85mm f/1.8 | Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.5 Macro | Sigma 100-300 f/4.5-6.7
Holga 120N
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
forsakenme720
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
910 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Mar 31, 2008 01:50 |  #14

chris_arnet wrote in post #5226554 (external link)
They calibrate it to a nifty fifty, yes. And noise is perfectly normal. Since IR is almost always landscape, photogs just shoot with a small aperture to compensate the focus difference.

Yeah, that's pretty much what I've found from my tests so far. Of course, it turns out that most of my lenses produce a hot spot so I'm gonna be buying news lenses that I can't afford now... ugh.


Cameras: Canon 20D, Canon Rebel XT (converted to infrared)
Lenses: Canon 17-40mm f4L; Tamron 28-75mm f2.8; Canon 10-22mm f3.5-4.5; Canon 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro; Canon 85mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
forsakenme720
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
910 posts
Joined Mar 2006
     
Mar 31, 2008 01:51 |  #15

chris_arnet wrote in post #5226554 (external link)
They calibrate it to a nifty fifty, yes. And noise is perfectly normal. Since IR is almost always landscape, photogs just shoot with a small aperture to compensate the focus difference.

Yeah, stopping down has definitely been helping.


Cameras: Canon 20D, Canon Rebel XT (converted to infrared)
Lenses: Canon 17-40mm f4L; Tamron 28-75mm f2.8; Canon 10-22mm f3.5-4.5; Canon 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro; Canon 85mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,917 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Recently converted to infrared: noisy and OOF
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1556 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.