Trip to New York

Hi, Dave,

Sounds like you have a great trip lined up!

Your 10-22 is definitely a good lens to have in the city -- you can really get the "big picture" with that lens! With the 24-105 as a "walk-around" lens you will definitely be set for all-around photography. But, for creativity, I'd agree with having a fast, shallow depth-of-field prime as well. It might be worth taking your 10-22 and 24-105 out and experimenting a bit and see what focal length(s) would most benefit you if you had a prime along, visualizing what the wider apertures would give you. Then you'll be prepared to make an informed decision.

Each of us has preferences when it comes to primes, so you'll need to get a feel of what works best for you. And, have fun!

I go to NYC often and find my 17 - 70 to be most useful. Your 24 - 105 will do the job. Be sure to bring a monopod/tripod for night shots. Have fun. If you like beer - try the Heartland Brewery. They have several restaurants in the city and brew up some good microbrews. Oatmeal Stout is my favorite. Beer & a burger - YUM!!

Thanks again for the advice all. Don't think I can get away with bringing a load of lenses back through customs though

tonylong wrote in post #5267497
Hi, Dave,

Sounds like you have a great trip lined up!

Your 10-22 is definitely a good lens to have in the city -- you can really get the "big picture" with that lens! With the 24-105 as a "walk-around" lens you will definitely be set for all-around photography. But, for creativity, I'd agree with having a fast, shallow depth-of-field prime as well. It might be worth taking your 10-22 and 24-105 out and experimenting a bit and see what focal length(s) would most benefit you if you had a prime along, visualizing what the wider apertures would give you. Then you'll be prepared to make an informed decision.

Each of us has preferences when it comes to primes, so you'll need to get a feel of what works best for you. And, have fun!

Thanks for the advice! I agree about the 10-22, it's a great lens. Taken it out on lots of trips to London and the like, and for the general picture it's a fantastic lens. Hardly came off the camera on a visit to the London Science Museum. And of course, the 24-105 has been great for pretty much everything else I take.

Based on what you said and my general feeling anyway, I'm getting a Sigma 30mm f/1.4. I really love that focal length and I think it'll be great for the kind of photos I like to shoot. I'm really looking forward to playing around with the really shallow depth of field as well. I think I'd probably prefer the 35L but I can't justify the cost right now and the Sigma has some great reviews.

I do like a good beer, so I will be sure to take you up on that advice Definitely taking my monopod for some night shots.

Less is more. If you are walking a lot, do not take too much. I had my 20D and 28-135 for a trip to NYC over 4 years ago and it was just fine. I got great shots and loved the little holster bag. If you are considering night photography, you're talking tripod, and that's really not possible if you want to be mobile. Just relax, take the two lenses, go to the top of the Rock or Empire State, and go crazy with your 10-22. It's all good. Grand Central is awesome with the UWA. You'll love it!

sebr wrote in post #5266064
I guess the 10-22 +24-105 should cover most of your needs.

Going to the US is a great shopping opportunity at the moment and you should not miss a visit to B&H. You could get what is in your wishlist

I second that. The 10-22MM and 40D is just great for Times Square and the surrounding area

Well, I'm back from the States and it was a great trip. What with just getting back I've not had a whole load of time to look through the photos, but I couldn't resist patching together a panorama that we got at Top of the Rock on our last night. Unfortunately, although I shipped my monopod in the suitcase I forgot it so all of the shots were handheld Thankfully they turned out okay, if a bit more noisy than I wanted.

Anyway, the Sigma is definitely a keeper until I decide to go FF. I have some great general portrait shots with it and a whole bunch of other shots. So thanks everyone for your advice, it really made my trip!

For anyone interested, I'd guess the 10-22 was on the body 70+% of the time, with the 24-105 and 30mm taking an equal 15% share.