Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 06 Apr 2008 (Sunday) 08:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why....does this happen

 
boomer3297
Senior Member
359 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: new jersey
     
Apr 06, 2008 08:58 |  #1

Hi All,

Hope you can help me.:confused: I took this at my daughter's(redhead) dance competition and many of the shots came out like this. Is it a result of a slow shutter speed or my Sigma 70-300 APO's inability to keep up with the action? The girl on the left is almost spot on? Should I use a different focusing method? Please help! By the way, They won the competition.
Thanks!


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mike Attanasio
www.AttanasioImagery.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 06, 2008 09:02 |  #2

Shutterspeed is too slow to freeze the motion.
Use ISO 1600 next time. Then you'd had 1/200 s. Still barely fast enough, but better.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Twitch1977
Senior Member
Avatar
619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
     
Apr 06, 2008 09:03 |  #3

This is a result of slow shutter speed and camera shake.

This is why people shell out money for the really expensive lenses. :(

Kurt


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/twitch1977/ (external link)
Advice is a noun, advise is a verb.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
narlus
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,671 posts
Likes: 85
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Andover, MA
     
Apr 06, 2008 09:10 |  #4

Twitch1977 wrote in post #5270812 (external link)
This is a result of slow shutter speed and camera shake.

This is why people shell out money for the really expensive lenses. :(

Kurt

but that expense is generally for large apertures, which wouldn't help in this case, as the DoF would too shallow to get all the dancers in focus.


www.tinnitus-photography.com (external link)
Facebook link (external link)

gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 06, 2008 09:14 |  #5

... then again, an expensive lens would have preformed exactly the same at ISO 400; f/5.6 ;)

edit: Damn, Narlus beat me to it...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 06, 2008 09:15 |  #6

narlus wrote in post #5270848 (external link)
but that expense is generally for large apertures, which wouldn't help in this case, as the DoF would too shallow to get all the dancers in focus.

OP only wants one dancer in focus, so a faster lens would be fine.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bphillips330
Senior Member
640 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: ohio
     
Apr 06, 2008 09:15 |  #7

Looking at the picture and the exif. your shutter speed is to slow! Unless you were on a tripod, even then 50th of a sec is pretty slow to stop actions. That is one of the limitations of that lens. I owened one too, till I invested in the 70-200 is. f5.6 is as wide as that lens goes. The only way to get faster shutter speeds at that apeture would be bump iso up to 800, if not 1600. You will get more grain in picture, but you will be able to keep the shutter speed above 150 (I thnk) Faster the shutter speed, more you will be able to stop the motion.

Why the first girl is in focus, and not your daughter, looks like focus is on her, maybe they moved and you camera originnaly locked focus on the other girl. Or the other girl happed to stop her head at just the right moment while your daughter was still moving.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Apr 06, 2008 10:09 |  #8

Or the other girl happed to stop her head at just the right moment while your daughter was still moving.

Works for me.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ R
Goldmember
4,319 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: 06478, CT
     
Apr 06, 2008 10:10 |  #9

F/2.8 from a fast lens would have allowed for a faster shutter, I would guess that for dance, you need a minimum of 1/250, maybe faster and when focused on your daughter, she would have come out fine. With your current lens, you can raise your ISO to obtain a faster shutter speed. It will introduce noise into the shot but nothing that you wouldn't be able to clean up depending on the size print you want. For Sports,Dance and Theater, I use a 70-200 f/2.8L USM. The cost with shipping was about $1300. If I'm close I'll use my 85 f/1.8 @ f/2.2


Mike R
www.mikerubinphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Apr 06, 2008 10:14 |  #10

Yes, I have shot many sports events with my sons now and I finally last year decided to get the 70-200 2.8 IS. I shoot at least 1/250 even indoors. It's good with ISO 2.8. But for really fast dancing, you cannot expect perfection, but with flash you have to sync and get it right. The 85 1.8 is what I use for indoor basketball if I can't bring the 70-200. That is very useful at f/2 and 1/250.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boomer3297
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
359 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: new jersey
     
Apr 06, 2008 12:12 |  #11

Thanks for the quick replies..... I had my camera set to AI focus but I guess the camera is slow to adjusting, would AI Servo be any better? Actually, I just looked at the manual and it suggests to set the camera to auto AF point and AI servo. Would you concur with this suggestion with your experiences?
Thanks again!


Mike Attanasio
www.AttanasioImagery.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 06, 2008 12:16 |  #12

boomer3297 wrote in post #5271626 (external link)
Thanks for the quick replies..... I had my camera set to AI focus but I guess the camera is slow to adjusting, would AI Servo be any better? Actually, I just looked at the manual and it suggests to set the camera to auto AF point and AI servo. Would you concur with this suggestion with your experiences?
Thanks again!

Boomer, the problem in your image is not a focus problem. I see girls both in front of and behind the target that are sharper than the target. This means all of the fuzziness on the target is because her head is moving faster than the shutter speed you had could freeze. You needed to shoot that scene with a shutter speed four times faster at a minimum.

As for focus, I never use auto point selection and I never use AI Focus. I would have shot the dancers with Servo focus and center point.

But again - your problem in that shot was not related to focussing.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Apr 06, 2008 14:17 |  #13

In addition to the suggestions above, timing is everything for an event like this. Spending time at their rehearsals could let you learn when there are moments of minimal movement (such as a moment when everyone is changing direction - capture the instant that the subjects are essentially stopped, even in mid-air).


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
Apr 06, 2008 14:25 |  #14

René Damkot wrote in post #5270807 (external link)
Shutterspeed is too slow to freeze the motion.
Use ISO 1600 next time. Then you'd had 1/200 s. Still barely fast enough, but better.

Yup that is pretty much what I would have said looking at the EXIF.


Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lungdoc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,101 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario Canada
     
Apr 06, 2008 16:08 |  #15

Other option is flash, if allowed (if not maybe at a rehearsal, pictures will be similar anyway). External flash, especially if you can bounce it, can work wonders and a lot cheaper than fast lenses.


Mark
My Smugmug (external link) Eos 7D, Canon G1X II, Canon 15-85 IS, Canon 17-85 IS, Sigma 100-300 EX IF HSM, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro, Sigma 50-150 2.8, Sigma 1.4 EX DG , Sigma 24-70 F2.8 DG Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22, Canon 430EX,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,224 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Why....does this happen
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2767 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.