Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 07 Apr 2008 (Monday) 12:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What to purchase next? Child portriature.

 
40piggies
Senior Member
286 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Apr 07, 2008 12:41 |  #1

...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ijohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,646 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Whiteriver, AZ
     
Apr 07, 2008 13:02 |  #2

An 85 1.8 should work great on your camera and get you a ton of crisp, beautiful shots of kids.


www.trickoflight.net (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/i​tj12345 (external link)
Original 5D still ROCKS!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trisha418
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Riverside, CA.
     
Apr 07, 2008 13:03 |  #3

85mm1.8


Trisha~ Rebel xti 400D, 18-55mm, 70-300mm IS, 50mm 1.8, BG-E3 Battery Grip, Sigma 24-60mm f/2.8, 85mm 1.8 430 EX speedlite ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sfordphoto
Goldmember
2,564 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Apr 07, 2008 13:12 |  #4

800mm f/5.6, to avoid them throwing up on you :). Just kidding! 85mm is amazing.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stian
Hatchling
Avatar
5 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Apr 07, 2008 15:32 |  #5

Elements would serve you just fine considering the cost of photoshop CS. As your skills/needs change you could always upgrade down the path.


1D mkIII, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
40piggies
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
286 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Apr 07, 2008 19:39 |  #6

...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudeofus
Senior Member
Avatar
502 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Apr 08, 2008 10:45 |  #7

When I took pictures of my newborn daughter, I brought all these fancy portrait lenses with me, just to discover that a macro lens was what I really needed. Babies are incredibly small, the head of a newborn is about 10 cm in diameter, the hands and feet are even smaller!

The lens I used mostly was the EF50mm F/2.5 macro, since it was the only macro which autofocussed all the way to the macro range (you don't want to MF your baby, they move way too fast. Yes, I grew up with MF lenses and know how to focus manually).

So my recommendation is you first figure out which size kids you want to take pictures of and which magnification you will need. From there you figure out the focal length you are comfortable with, possibly go to a decent store and try out a few lenses in the range.


Discovery is not accidental. We discover only when we make ourselves ready to receive and photographers seek discovery by mastering their craft. But it begins somewhere else. It begins with daisies, kids, awful scenes, falling in love, or growing old. It begins with that which matters to you. And it ends with visual statements that express what matters to you about these things. It is not sight the camera satisfies so thoroughly, but the mind. - Christian Molidor

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Apr 08, 2008 10:46 |  #8

My take on the seminar...

The OP wrote:

"I have discovered a local photographer whose work I really admired... turns out that this photographer is doing a weekend seminar... for beginners/prof. The investment for that is about 850-... it is two full days (9-5) and snacks and lunch provided both days. I have no idea... it is a ton of money to be, but the information would be invaluable. What do you all think?"

That is a ton of money which, with your lack of equipment could be much better spent on some new gear.

Although the 85mm f/1.8 lens is a really nice piece of glass; I recommend basing your lens collection on a really top-notch medium-range zoom lens. Although I do love my17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens for general photography and use it as my "go-to" lens for general shooting, I would suggest a zoom with a bit longer end than the 17-55mm lens offers. I much prefer my 24-70mm f/2.8L for shooting people - especially in a studio.

The two medium-range zoom lenses that come to mind immediately are the 24-70mm f/2.8L and the less expensive, but very good, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di (I might have omitted a bit of Tamron's alphabet soup designation).

IMO, for shooting kids, the longer end is more important than the shorter end. You tend to get some distortion when shooting people with shorter focal lengths.

You can probably get a good used 24-70L for the $850 that you would pay for the seminar and you can get a Tamron for about $500 or so. If you choose the Tamron, you could (with some luck and careful shopping) get a lighting setup for the extra $350.

If some of you are getting ready to hit your keyboard denying that an adequate lighting setup can be had for $350 or less; I purchased an excellent 3-monolight German-made Multiblitz Mini 200 set for $200 plus a few bucks shipping on eBay. In addition to the 3 monolights; the set included barndoors, snoot, grid, filter holder and set of colored glass filters - all in a fitted fiberglass suitcase. The equipment was in primo shape and Multiblitz continues to support this gear with replacement parts such as flash tubes

Throw in 3 inexpensive stands ( the Monolights-200 are not heavy) and a large window shade on a stand for a background and you are equipped for some really professional looking child portraiture.

In addition to studio shooting, the constant f/2.8 aperture of either of the above lenses will allow available light shooting also.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,235 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
What to purchase next? Child portriature.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2812 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.