Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 08 Apr 2008 (Tuesday) 18:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Loosing detail in photos

 
Billiie
Senior Member
441 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Apr 08, 2008 18:52 |  #1

I was wondering.. How do you all keep the detail in your photos? I need to send a bunch of images out through email, and they need to be original size.. but when I upload them to PS at the original size, they loose a lot of detail compared to when they are at a smaller size.. They also look a bit fuzzy.

What do I do? They really need to be crisp and clear. Help!

I also changed them to 300 dpi (they need to be that for the person I'm sending them to) and that doesn't seem to help either.

Thanks in advance!


Every time someone tells me how sharp my photos are, I assume that it isn't a very interesting photograph. If it were, they would have more to say. ~Author Unknown

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Apr 08, 2008 18:58 |  #2

Anybody who insists on 300dpi doesn't really know what they're doing, but that's not the issue.

I don't really understand your question. Are you shrinking (resizing) your photos to email them, or simply saving as jpeg (with compression)?


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,668 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3302
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Apr 08, 2008 19:09 |  #3

Damo77 wrote in post #5288518 (external link)
Anybody who insists on 300dpi doesn't really know what they're doing

wow! thats a sweeping statement! i insist that people supply me with 300DPI images for publication purposes, saves me having to mess around when i import a 72dpi JPG into InDesign and its bigger than my pasteboard!


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Apr 08, 2008 19:10 |  #4

Yeah, fair call. I withdraw the statement.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billiie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
441 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Apr 08, 2008 19:11 as a reply to  @ Damo77's post |  #5

I use picasa to edit my photos, and when you export them, you can choose to export them at original size.. so I guess, no I am not resizing them. But when I export them at the original size, they loose a lot of their detail... I don't think they are getting compressed, but I am not good at this stuff... so I guess I sound confusing lol..

Anyway, does that sound better?


Every time someone tells me how sharp my photos are, I assume that it isn't a very interesting photograph. If it were, they would have more to say. ~Author Unknown

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,668 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3302
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Apr 08, 2008 19:12 |  #6

Billiie wrote in post #5288470 (external link)
I also changed them to 300 dpi (they need to be that for the person I'm sending them to) and that doesn't seem to help either.

ok when you change the image size, you'll see a check box on the bottom right of the image size dialogue that says Resample Image, uncheck it, because if you don't you are infact increasing the amount of pixels instead of adjusting just the DPI of the original


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billiie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
441 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Apr 08, 2008 19:16 |  #7

Bobster wrote in post #5288595 (external link)
ok when you change the image size, you'll see a check box on the bottom right of the image size dialogue that says Resample Image, uncheck it, because if you don't you are infact increasing the amount of pixels instead of adjusting just the DPI of the original

Yes, I do that, thank you :D I wish that would solve my problem.


Every time someone tells me how sharp my photos are, I assume that it isn't a very interesting photograph. If it were, they would have more to say. ~Author Unknown

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billiie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
441 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Apr 08, 2008 19:21 as a reply to  @ Billiie's post |  #8

OK here is an example...

resized photo:

IMAGE: http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e217/23445/paintshop/IMG_6295.jpg

And original size.. the photo appears to be "soft" even though it has been edited and sharpened.. I just don't understand.
IMAGE: http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e217/23445/paintshop/IMG_6295-1.jpg

Every time someone tells me how sharp my photos are, I assume that it isn't a very interesting photograph. If it were, they would have more to say. ~Author Unknown

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 08, 2008 19:27 |  #9

When you resize an image smaller and then sharpen it will look sharper on a monitor than a full size image that is appropriately sharpened for its size.

Print them at a large size, and the full resolution image will be a lot sharper in print.

View them at 100% and the full resolution image will appear sharper.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,668 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3302
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Apr 08, 2008 19:32 |  #10

you didn't sharpen enough ;)


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billiie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
441 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Apr 08, 2008 19:47 as a reply to  @ Bobster's post |  #11

Thanks for the help guys :D Believe me, I sharpened the larger one a lot, and it really did no good.. and I find it just more fuzzy... Hopefully you're right Jeffrey! The person I'm sending them too is using these photos for a manual, and they need to be crisp, I'm just really hoping when she prints them, they turn out better compared to what is on my monitor :confused:


Every time someone tells me how sharp my photos are, I assume that it isn't a very interesting photograph. If it were, they would have more to say. ~Author Unknown

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 08, 2008 20:42 |  #12

Billiie wrote in post #5288815 (external link)
Thanks for the help guys :D Believe me, I sharpened the larger one a lot, and it really did no good.. and I find it just more fuzzy... Hopefully you're right Jeffrey! The person I'm sending them too is using these photos for a manual, and they need to be crisp, I'm just really hoping when she prints them, they turn out better compared to what is on my monitor :confused:

Send the full res and resized images to Costco and get them each printed as 8x12 for $1.49 and see for yourself. Be sure to mark the images in some way so that you can be sure which is which.

If the full res image is not to your liking this turns into a great exercise where you can try different sharpening on the monitor and then see how it prints.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bodog
Goldmember
Avatar
1,306 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Peculiar, MO
     
Apr 08, 2008 23:16 |  #13

Billiie wrote in post #5288470 (external link)
but when I upload them to PS at the original size, they loose a lot of detail compared to when they are at a smaller size.. They also look a bit fuzzy.

I still don't understand what you are doing. Are you sizing the images smaller, then re-sizing them larger later? Or are you just viewing them at a smaller magnification, then at larger magnification?. When were they a smaller size before "uploading to PS"? If you sized them smaller, you threw away pixels that cannot be recovered later. Re-sizing lto their original size later just adds "filler" and of course you would lose detail... Changing the dpi number does nothing for the image quality or detail, or size.


JimE
Color? It's all relative...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,668 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3302
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Apr 09, 2008 17:33 |  #14

ah ha! i think your on to something Jim! so Billie, u've resized all your pics and are trying to make them the original size agian?


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,575 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Loosing detail in photos
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
900 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.