Thanks Chris, Mevunky,
The point Chris was avoiding having to do person additions, but to somehow keep the field type of "person or group".
Essentially, I think the better option for these guys is a text field. Adding contacts etc will just add another step when the user adds a record. (which is exactly the reason they don't want the "check names" stuff to come into play).
I think it's a conceptual issue, if they want to add any old person in there (without having to do the 'contacts' step) a text field is what they need. Because, by definition, the "person or group" field expects an already known 'person or group' to be selected when the record is created. (I can code some C# and handle the addition on the fly, which is probably what I might have to do)
I don't want to get too deep under the hood and break other parts of the functionality of the "person or group" fields though.
Hmmm. Normal service can now resume. Apologies for hijacking the thread.
Cliff
Thanks again Chris, Mevunky.