Hi All,
Just a random selection of aviation photos taken over the last few months. All advice/comments much appreciated.
Thanks for looking.
Paul
PMN Member 116 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Bradford, UK More info | Apr 09, 2008 06:08 | #1 Hi All, Thanks for looking. Paul Canon 30D, Canon 350D, Canon EOS 10, EF 70-200L f4, Sigma 50-500 DG, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 28-300 XR Di
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.  More info | Apr 09, 2008 07:22 | #3 Nice. When you can, a bit more room at the front of the A/C would be good. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FatAlbert Senior Member  805 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Finally back in the UK - Dammit! :-( More info | Nice shots. A good variety, and all interesting. Looks like you nailed the exposure on the night shots. FatAlbert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BenDaniels Senior Member  950 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: East Preston, West Sussex ,England More info | Apr 09, 2008 08:25 | #5 Great shots!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JSJR4 Senior Member  977 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Apr 09, 2008 08:26 | #6 Awesome shots D200: 10.5DX2.8 fisheye: 17-55DX2.8: 70-200VR2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2008 08:30 | #7 Ben Daniels wrote in post #5292102  Great shots! I thought I was looking at airliners.net! What airport was it? Ha! Thankyou! They're mostly from Manchester Airport but the night ones are from Funchal, Madeira. Canon 30D, Canon 350D, Canon EOS 10, EF 70-200L f4, Sigma 50-500 DG, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 28-300 XR Di
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2008 08:42 | #8 #1 would be much better with a lot more sky, and a lot less fence. 7D, 5D MKIII, 17-40 f/4L, 24-70 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/2.8L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xII, 2.0xII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RCoulter Goldmember  1,703 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Reno,NV More info | Apr 09, 2008 08:57 | #9 VERY nice set! Airliners.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2008 08:59 | #10 adamsti wrote in post #5292189 #1 would be much better with a lot more sky, and a lot less fence. In general terms I agree, but unfortunately some of the aviation websites I upload to don't agree. I'd rather have a little bit of fence in the way and have the photo accepted onto Jetphotos than get a rejection for the aircraft not being centred. Then again, it just depends on how you intend to use the photo. The fence isn't all that attractive, I have to agree! Canon 30D, Canon 350D, Canon EOS 10, EF 70-200L f4, Sigma 50-500 DG, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 28-300 XR Di
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lkb-28 Goldmember  1,809 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Bucks; UK More info | Apr 09, 2008 09:52 | #11 Hi Paul; Comments & Criticisms ALWAYS welcome...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2008 10:14 | #12 PMN wrote in post #5292287 In general terms I agree, but unfortunately some of the aviation websites I upload to don't agree. I'd rather have a little bit of fence in the way and have the photo accepted onto Jetphotos than get a rejection for the aircraft not being centred. Then again, it just depends on how you intend to use the photo. The fence isn't all that attractive, I have to agree! Paul And that, in a nutshell, is why those photo websites as mentioned above, would not know what a good photograph is, even if it slapped them silly in the face. 7D, 5D MKIII, 17-40 f/4L, 24-70 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/2.8L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xII, 2.0xII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2008 10:34 | #13 adamsti wrote in post #5292805 And that, in a nutshell, is why those photo websites as mentioned above, would not know what a good photograph is, even if it slapped them silly in the face.  And again to a degree I couldn't agree more. I've had many an argument as to whether the artistic merits of a photo are more important than it having an absolute level of technical 'correctness' but I think shooting aviation and uploading to those sites is a very good way to get many technical aspects of photography right. I probably spend roughly half my time shooting aviation on digital and the other half shooting other, more scenic things on digital and film. It's nice to have a balance and I find the technical aspects help the artistic and vice versa, but everyone's an individual and has different ideas. I know if I hadn't started shooting aviation early on and getting rejections from various sites I wouldn't know as much as I do now. I just hope that knowledge helps me in other areas! Canon 30D, Canon 350D, Canon EOS 10, EF 70-200L f4, Sigma 50-500 DG, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 28-300 XR Di
LOG IN TO REPLY |
iesphotos UKSE Photographer of the Year 2013 6,290 posts Likes: 258 Joined Aug 2006 Location: A Manc in Sarf London, UK More info | Apr 09, 2008 10:56 | #14 How does that song go..He's here, He's there, He's every....... www.iesphotography.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2008 11:58 | #15 ies photos wrote in post #5293029 How does that song go..He's here, He's there, He's every....... I'd say they were good shots mate, esp the US Airways and the new SIA cls! What are you doing here?! Canon 30D, Canon 350D, Canon EOS 10, EF 70-200L f4, Sigma 50-500 DG, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 28-300 XR Di
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is bzguy 1393 guests, 188 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
