Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 09 Apr 2008 (Wednesday) 22:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Noise software

 
jordan101
Member
Avatar
93 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Apr 09, 2008 22:01 |  #1

hey, what are some good free noise software programs. i've never really been one for post proseesing but now that im starting to sell my photos i need to start this. thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Apr 09, 2008 22:12 |  #2

Have you done a search on this forum? These programs are discussed frequently.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Apr 09, 2008 23:00 |  #3

Jordan,

Ignore Damo77, he obviously hasn't read our rules:

4. (The "don't be a jerk" language)...

If you know an answer to a question either answer it or say nothing. Giving newbies blunt answers like "search the forum" is not allowed - please use the typing effort to giving the answer instead. Or just give the link to that post you wished the newbie should have searched for. Respect newbies - you were a newbie once.


As to your question there are three big programs on the noise reduction front. NoiseWare, Noise Ninja, and Neat Image.

My personal preference has been NoiseWare. The Community (free) edition can be found HERE. (external link) I will admit that I have never used Noise Ninja, and it has been a long time since I used Neat Image. The reason for liking NoiseWare over N.I. is speed. At the time, NoiseWare was substantially faster, taking only 8 to 10 seconds verses one or two minutes for processing. At the time, Noise Ninja was described by those who used it as a being about the same speed as Neat Image, which is why I never tried it. They may have sped up in subsequent versions (perhaps someone else will answer with info on the "state of the art" for them.)

The free version of NoiseWare is NOT a Photoshop plug in, rather a stand alone application. I believe this is true for N.N. and N.I. as well. Technically, by saving a jpg, removing the noise and re-saving it, you could be introducing artifacts, but I have never seen any evidence of that. The only remaining drawback of a stand alone program is the need to take the shot out of Photoshop. 'Tis a bit of a hassle. I recommend the Standard edition. Fifty bucks - what's that these days anyways? Pizza and beer for two, right? So splurge.

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Apr 09, 2008 23:12 |  #4

Whoa! That's a bit harsh. I don't think it's irrelevant to ask if a search had been performed.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Uhland
Senior Member
Avatar
864 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Apr 09, 2008 23:48 |  #5

Damo77 wrote in post #5297712 (external link)
Whoa! That's a bit harsh. I don't think it's irrelevant to ask if a search had been performed.

I agree being how the OP has under 100 posts.
He/She may not be familiar with the handy dandy search.

Now if the poster had 500+ posts then thats another story.

Then again some people do search and can not find the info.
I've been there. Im sure we all have.


:mrgreen:https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Apr 09, 2008 23:58 |  #6

Apologies if I offended anyone.

Jordan, I think noise is less of a problem than any of us think.

Because we stare at photos all day, we notice every little flaw and imperfection in our images. But the paying public don't worry about things like noise anywhere near as much as we do!!

I've rarely found it necessary to remove noise from photos, even very high ISO ones. I just take special care not to exaggerate the noise when I sharpen. Kind of like "don't poke a sleeping tiger" or words to that effect.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aubie7
Junior Member
27 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Apr 10, 2008 00:24 as a reply to  @ Damo77's post |  #7

I use Neat Image. It has worked really well for all my sports pics.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jasonleehl
Senior Member
521 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Apr 10, 2008 02:17 |  #8

I use the community version of Noiseware and is loving it!


You're welcome to follow me at Instagram (external link) or visit my gallery at http://www.timestoodst​ill.sg (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HyperYagami
Goldmember
2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
     
Apr 10, 2008 02:25 as a reply to  @ jasonleehl's post |  #9

I tend to like Noiseware more than NeatImage for some reason that I can't explain (I have tried both).



5D3 and a few lens
es.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Broadway53
Member
Avatar
127 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 172
Joined Jun 2006
     
Apr 10, 2008 09:15 |  #10

I made a trip to Antelope Canyon a couple years ago and loved the tour given by the Navajo guide. Unfortunately, we missed the small window of opportunity for prime sunlight at high noon so all my shots were noisey. I was able to salvage almost all the shots using Noiseware and love the results. For a free software program you can't go wrong.


Canon 6D, Canon 7D, Canon G1x, Canon 24-70 II, Canon 70-300, Canon 100L Macro, Canon 16-35 F4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agedbriar
Goldmember
Avatar
2,657 posts
Likes: 399
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Slovenia
     
Apr 10, 2008 17:58 |  #11

I use Noiseware and lately I apply it after sharpening, as the last step. It does a good job in preserving details.

I started with the free (called Community) edition, but if I remember well it wouldn't read or save in TIFF. (I was following the rule that NR should be done first, at that time). Whether it was for that or some other deficiency, I eventually bought the regular standalone version. I do not need to use it very often, so doing the noise reduction outside my editor is not such a drawback to me and the price is considerably lower than the plugin version.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Epix
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
     
Apr 10, 2008 18:13 |  #12

I use Noiseware. Works well.


Rick
5D | 24-70 f2.8L | 50mm f/1.8
www.usethelight.com (external link)
"I like my images RAW"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Apr 11, 2008 10:32 |  #13

A quick note....
If you make sure you do not underexpose at high ISO you will assure that you have as little noise as possible.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnthebaptist
Senior Member
Avatar
687 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Manchester, TN USA
     
Apr 18, 2008 11:04 |  #14

I just downloaded noiseware and tried it on an air show photo - WOW! what a difference it makes. Highly recommended on first impression.


:) johnthebaptist :)
My Gear
https://photography-on-the.net …?p=5487350&post​count=1171

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shooting
Goldmember
Avatar
1,552 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2008
     
Apr 18, 2008 11:20 as a reply to  @ johnthebaptist's post |  #15

I use Noiseware Pro but I do it before sharpening.
Sharpening is the last thing I do to an image..if you sharpen first then all your other adjustments or things you do can ruin the sharpness and make it soft again.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,653 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
Noise software
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1190 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.