Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 10 Apr 2008 (Thursday) 15:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Give me your thoughts....

 
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,134 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Apr 10, 2008 15:38 |  #1

.... good or bad, don't care. I posted this in the Travel and Landscape section and it got completely ignored. I am curious what makes this so hoo-humm because I kinda of like it. But I am hardly objective here... so I would love to hear your opinions... good, bad, ugly, or just dang boring.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
justchris
Senior Member
354 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
     
Apr 10, 2008 15:47 |  #2

This is the type of picture that sounds awesome on paper, but then when you actually see it, it's like, "Eh..."

Still an interesting shot even if it's not a major work of art.


Canon 500D
18-55mm 3.5-5.6 IS
50mm 1.8
Canon Powershot SD1300 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Apr 10, 2008 15:50 |  #3

It's just too dark. If you had exposed it longer you could do a lot in post to inject life into the shot. As it stands it becomes too noisy when trying to bring up the levels of brightness and contrast.

Here's my go at it, but the noise reduction starts to give it a watercolor effect.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Apr 10, 2008 16:17 as a reply to  @ LeuceDeuce's post |  #4

There is so much noise in this photo...the colors are now working against it.

color slide and crop...goes right to painting-ish, not the photo you took, but a somewhat fantasy sky:confused:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cobra351
Goldmember
Avatar
2,996 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Apr 10, 2008 19:58 as a reply to  @ Flo's post |  #5

I like lightning shots anyway, so I'm biased! I like it. I think it might benefit from some cropping though, remove more of the dark areas on all four sides to make the lightning and the clouds "larger".


Canon 5D Mark II
Canon 40D - Infrared Modified (www.lifepixel.com (external link))
Canon Lenses: 17-40, 24-105 f/4 IS, 100 2.8 IS Macro, TS-E 90, 70-200 f/4 IS, 100-400 IS
Canon EF25 II , EF 1.4x II

Smith & Wesson M&P 340CT .357 Magnum

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackcap
Senior Member
415 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
     
Apr 11, 2008 04:56 |  #6

I like Flo's edit.


_______________
www.chrisgin.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
THREAD ­ STARTER
making stuff up
Avatar
8,134 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Apr 11, 2008 10:13 |  #7

It's always interesting to see how others view stuff.... very cool. Thanks. I am not sure why the grain/noise popped in this shot...need to look at the master. I don't remember it being so bad and I kept ISO way down too. Hmmmm.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Apr 11, 2008 10:18 as a reply to  @ Croasdail's post |  #8

I would like to see the EXIF.can't read anything from the photo?


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Apr 11, 2008 13:17 |  #9

Croasdail wrote in post #5307113 (external link)
It's always interesting to see how others view stuff.... very cool. Thanks. I am not sure why the grain/noise popped in this shot...need to look at the master. I don't remember it being so bad and I kept ISO way down too. Hmmmm.

Noise is always an issue when you try to recover shadow areas in an image. The best way to avoid it is to expose so that your histogram is as close to the right side without clipping.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Apr 11, 2008 13:28 |  #10

I think photos like this have a certain appeal to the original shooter becuase of the "Holy Sh*t, I did it...!!!" factor.

Not to take anything away from the effort, but I know I'm guilty of hanging on to certain shots because the technical aspects required to even get something close outweigh the actual quality of the final image.

The more you shoot, the more ruthless you start to become with your post-shoot editing. Conversely, the more you shoot, the better your keeper to trash ratio becomes as well. Eventually, everything you shoot will be a winner!! Right Gang? ;)


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
THREAD ­ STARTER
making stuff up
Avatar
8,134 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Apr 11, 2008 14:17 |  #11

Flo wrote in post #5307150 (external link)
I would like to see the EXIF.can't read anything from the photo?

Canon 1D mk IIn w/ 17-40 f4
ISO 320
Shutter - 20 Seconds
F - 6.3.
lens - shot at 23mm

Image was shot RAW

Noise is always an issue when you try to recover shadow areas in an image.

.

this was only ISO 320 - but sharpening might have been turned up too high in the raw converter. I almost always remember to turn sharpening all the way off. That might explain the noise - though personally it isn't bugging me as much as it is you all. I grew up with their being noise/grain in night shots - I think my expectations are a bit off from today's standard noise ninja'ed stuff. But again, at ISO 320, there shouldn't have been much to start with.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neumanns
Goldmember
Avatar
1,465 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North Centeral Minnesota
     
Apr 11, 2008 14:30 |  #12

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #5308406 (external link)
I think photos like this have a certain appeal to the original shooter becuase of the "Holy Sh*t, I did it...!!!" factor.

I have several lightning photos Of my own that I like for no other reason than this...Well stated.

I have tried reediting mine several diffrent times and always wind up with an edit much like the original post...gues that's my preferance also.

Any summer evening with a thunderstorm looming will find me setting outside ready to bring the gear in when the first rain falls...I love storms so this is an awsome way to spend the evening.


7D, Sigma 8-16, 17-55, 70-200 2.8 IS, 580ExII, ........Searching for Talent & Skill; Will settle for Blind Luck!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
greygoose
Senior Member
437 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
Location: New York aka Noo Yawk
     
Apr 11, 2008 18:26 |  #13

if you have the raw file try working on that.
a little dark, but i like it actually.


Canon 1D Mark IIn, 35mm f/1.4, 50mm f/1.4, 70-200mm f/4, 580ex, 580ex II, 580ex II, vivitar 285, tripod, android

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrbojangles13
Senior Member
Avatar
825 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: nj
     
Apr 11, 2008 18:31 |  #14

diggin flo's edit. nice job bringing this picture back, i would have probably thrown it out and lost a great keeper


some glass, some metal, some plastic
south jersey wedding and portrait photography provokerphoto.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
THREAD ­ STARTER
making stuff up
Avatar
8,134 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Apr 13, 2008 17:14 |  #15

Thanks everyone for you input and renditions... very educational. Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,646 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Give me your thoughts....
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1479 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.