Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 18 Nov 2004 (Thursday) 21:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

manual vs auto focus

 
transcend
Goldmember
Avatar
1,461 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Squamish, BC
     
Nov 18, 2004 21:26 |  #1

I have a 17-40L on my 10d, recently i have been noticing images seem sort of soft. I ran a few quick very unscientific tests, and it seems that the AF almost 100% of the time, focuses a bit more softly then by hand.

If i manually focus i can get it razor sharp, otherwise i cannot.

This was on a tripod, 180/sec, iso 200, flash on and flash off. No chance of hand shake (which i normally attribute to this, but which doesnt appear to be the case as it happens at all shutter speeds.

Is this normal and am i just paranoid? Or should i look into having it calibrated?


http://www.fraserbritt​on.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlipsidE
Goldmember
Avatar
1,701 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: South Carolina USA
     
Nov 18, 2004 21:50 |  #2

The camera and/or lens could be front focusing or back focusing. Unfortunately, I don't have the links to point you toward the tests, but there are front focus and back focus test available.

FlipsidE


FlipsidE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Nov 18, 2004 21:54 |  #3

My camera and long lens were having a "softness" problem starting just a few days ago. Finally, I looked at it and the viewfinder eyepiece diopter setting had gotten tweaked. As soon as I re-tweaked it, the problem went away.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EXA1a
Member
242 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
Nov 19, 2004 03:04 |  #4

transcend wrote:
I ran a few quick very unscientific tests, and it seems that the AF almost 100% of the time, focuses a bit more softly then by hand.

Please don't mix up the terms "soft" and "out of focus". You are talking about a potential misfocussing problem, right?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
transcend
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,461 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Squamish, BC
     
Nov 19, 2004 06:34 |  #5

EXA1a wrote:
transcend wrote:
I ran a few quick very unscientific tests, and it seems that the AF almost 100% of the time, focuses a bit more softly then by hand.

Please don't mix up the terms "soft" and "out of focus". You are talking about a potential misfocussing problem, right?

Possibly a misfocus problem, possibly just the lens being soft and completely normal. This is an L lens however, i expected much better performance then I am getting, especially when at middle apertures. Wide open i expected it to be a bit soft.

I have front abd back focus tests now, so i will give it a shot this afternoon


http://www.fraserbritt​on.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EXA1a
Member
242 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
Nov 19, 2004 07:13 |  #6

transcend wrote:
EXA1a wrote:
transcend wrote:
I ran a few quick very unscientific tests, and it seems that the AF almost 100% of the time, focuses a bit more softly then by hand.

Please don't mix up the terms "soft" and "out of focus". You are talking about a potential misfocussing problem, right?

Possibly a misfocus problem, possibly just the lens being soft and completely normal. This is an L lens however, i expected much better performance then I am getting, especially when at middle apertures. Wide open i expected it to be a bit soft.

I have front abd back focus tests now, so i will give it a shot this afternoon

In your original post you found differences between MF and AF shots, and that's misfocusing for sure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jalafer
Member
118 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Getxo, Spain
     
Nov 19, 2004 07:49 |  #7

FlipsidE wrote:
The camera and/or lens could be front focusing or back focusing. Unfortunately, I don't have the links to point you toward the tests, but there are front focus and back focus test available.

FlipsidE

A very simple focusing test.
Put your camera on a solid tripod in front of a wall.
Put a printed sheet on the wall (a wall with painted paper would be Ok).
Make one picture in AF, then turn the camera on MF, focus manually and make the second picture.
Check the results in your computer screen, if MF is better than AF, then your camera is frontfocussing. Take into account that you can have this probelm with one lens and not have ot with another.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Nov 19, 2004 08:20 |  #8

jalafer wrote:
if MF is better than AF, then your camera is frontfocussing.

But if AF is better this test means nothing, because the diopter could be off.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Nov 19, 2004 08:54 |  #9

jalafer wrote:
FlipsidE wrote:
The camera and/or lens could be front focusing or back focusing. Unfortunately, I don't have the links to point you toward the tests, but there are front focus and back focus test available.

FlipsidE

A very simple focusing test.
Put your camera on a solid tripod in front of a wall.
Put a printed sheet on the wall (a wall with painted paper would be Ok).
Make one picture in AF, then turn the camera on MF, focus manually and make the second picture.
Check the results in your computer screen, if MF is better than AF, then your camera is frontfocussing. Take into account that you can have this probelm with one lens and not have ot with another.

You might do better with this test if you set the camera and tripod so that the camera is facing the wall at a 45 degree angle. Then set the lens to AF and shoot a couple of frames. This way, you'll be able to better see if the camera is back or front focusing or if the lens is just soft to begin with.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jalafer
Member
118 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Getxo, Spain
     
Nov 19, 2004 09:01 |  #10

You might do better with this test if you set the camera and tripod so that the camera is facing the wall at a 45 degree angle. Then set the lens to AF and shoot a couple of frames. This way, you'll be able to better see if the camera is back or front focusing or if the lens is just soft to begin with.[/QUOTE]


In my opinion is better if you face the wall direct. If your lens is front focussing (as it happened with an old 70-210 in my case) you will realise inmediately because the MF picture will be well focussed.
Of course if you do it at 45º and put a mark on the paper to be foussing at, the you can see is your camera is front or back focussing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
transcend
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,461 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Squamish, BC
     
Nov 19, 2004 11:48 |  #11

jalafer wrote:
You might do better with this test if you set the camera and tripod so that the camera is facing the wall at a 45 degree angle. Then set the lens to AF and shoot a couple of frames. This way, you'll be able to better see if the camera is back or front focusing or if the lens is just soft to begin with.


In my opinion is better if you face the wall direct. If your lens is front focussing (as it happened with an old 70-210 in my case) you will realise inmediately because the MF picture will be well focussed.
Of course if you do it at 45º and put a mark on the paper to be foussing at, the you can see is your camera is front or back focussing.

I will be using the focusing chart i printed out online, and the camera at a 45 deg angle. Trying to see what it is doing. If it is front focusing, i take it it is a simple enough calibration at a canon service center? Any idea on cost?


http://www.fraserbritt​on.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lmelendez
Senior Member
815 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 19, 2004 11:51 |  #12

If you suspect that your camera is back focusing... what do you do? you just use MF all the time ?! ?

How can you calibrate that?


http://www.bluejaygall​ery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Nov 19, 2004 12:23 |  #13

lmelendez wrote:
If you suspect that your camera is back focusing... what do you do? you just use MF all the time ?! ?

How can you calibrate that?

You can't, but Canon can.

A focus problem might be related to the camera body being out of spec, or it might be related to the lens being out of spec. Canon can test each piece independently, correct as necessary, and then put them together to make sure the combination is still right.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
transcend
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,461 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Squamish, BC
     
Nov 19, 2004 12:57 |  #14

robertwgross wrote:
lmelendez wrote:
If you suspect that your camera is back focusing... what do you do? you just use MF all the time ?! ?

How can you calibrate that?

You can't, but Canon can.

A focus problem might be related to the camera body being out of spec, or it might be related to the lens being out of spec. Canon can test each piece independently, correct as necessary, and then put them together to make sure the combination is still right.

---Bob Gross---

yup, luckily there is a service center 20 mins form my house. I will take both in on monday.


http://www.fraserbritt​on.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
transcend
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,461 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Squamish, BC
     
Nov 19, 2004 13:53 |  #15

here is the result of the test.

Taken at 45 degs (as per marking on tripod, may be slightly off).
40mm, f 4.5, 3 foot distance aproximately. On 17-40L

I would assume that at 40mm/4.5 DOF would be pretty decent, would being off of 45deg even a tiny amount make the test worthless? It looks like it is back focusing a fair amount.

Also, as for the diopter, i just tested it and my manual focusing indoor in not so great light is not good. WAY off for now, i wear a fairly bizarre Rx pair of glasses tho (oddly shaped eyeball due to concussions). I matched it up so that AF looks sharp, when looking through it, but obviously this wont work if AF is off.,

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


this shot is from straight on

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

http://www.fraserbritt​on.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,361 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
manual vs auto focus
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1945 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.