http://www.overstock.com …E=PROFRAME&PROD_ID=744856
not a canon, but the •100 pixel resolution must be something to behold. Of course the extended warrenty is not available in california, sigh, guess I'll have to pass 
djtowle Member  116 posts Joined Apr 2003 Location: California More info | Nov 19, 2004 14:44 | #1 http://www.overstock.com …E=PROFRAME&PROD_ID=744856
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdhender Senior Member  547 posts Joined Oct 2004 Location: Chicago More info | Nov 19, 2004 15:39 | #2 That was funny. Made me laugh Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000)  More info | Nov 19, 2004 19:20 | #3 Hey.. tape 48 of them to a sheet of plywood in a 6 camera by 8 camera rectangle.. and trigger the shutters together... and for $1,392.00 (minus the cost of the plywood) you'll have a very portable (some assembly required) half megapixel camera! GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 19, 2004 21:45 | #4 CyberDyneSystems wrote: Or.. just hook it to the back of my 500mm prime... with the 4000X "Crop factor" that would equal a 2,000,000mm super telephoto! CDS you may have just solved Nasa &/or some astronomers budget problems!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1953 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
Why build bigger telescopes, just use smaller sensors 
