Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 15 Apr 2008 (Tuesday) 12:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Digital Vs film

 
Gliderparentntn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,582 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Shelbyville TN
     
Apr 15, 2008 12:42 |  #1

I'm sure this debate will never end but with todays technology in digital cameras, can one say that in todays world digital images will produce better pictures on an overall basis over film?

I ask this for the purpose of building a new updated home theater system and am looking to replace my standard movies with the new Blu Ray formats in HD
on another thread I was told only a coulpe moves were actually produced using a true HD camera and everything else is still produced using film, and was told film still had a better picture than digital in movies.


James
1DMKIII, 1DsMKIII, 17-40L, 24-70L[COLOR=black], 135[COLOR=red]L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS,200L, 300 f/4L IS, 400 5.6L, 600L, 85 f/1.8, 100 macro, Sigma 50mm f/1.4 HSM, Sigma 85mm 1.4 HSM, 1.4xII + extension tubes, MPe65

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ C
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Now: N 39°36' 8.2" W 104°53' 58"; prev N 43°4' 33" W 88°13' 23"; home N 34°7' 0" W 118°16' 18"
     
Apr 15, 2008 16:04 |  #2

Gliderparentntn wrote in post #5334101 (external link)
I'm sure this debate will never end but with todays technology in digital cameras, can one say that in todays world digital images will produce better pictures on an overall basis over film?

Film still has more dynamic and tonal range than digital. However, as manufacturers improve their sensor with better technology, I expect at some point in the future, digital will surpass the quality of film.

Personally, I think there is one genre where film will always beat digital - B&W. Also, MF and LF.


Gear: Kodak Brownie and homemade pin-hole cameras. Burlap sack for a bag.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zansho
"I'd kill for a hot pink 40D"
Avatar
2,547 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 800
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Austin, Tx
     
Apr 15, 2008 16:10 |  #3

Medium Format and Large format View Cameras are still being used today in film shoots. It's hard to beat the quality of a 4x5 Large Format View Camera with chrome film and a good quality scanner - resolution that'll beat just about anything short of a Hasselblad digital.

On one hand, Digital has the advantage of instant gratification - you can see your shots in real time, and make your adjustments on the fly. Film... you have to wait to see your results, and adjust way later before it even comes to "light" on paper. I like digital sometimes for soft proofing the image, then I shoot it with the Large format in film - mainly for product shots.

However, the bulk of my work is wedding and portrait. Can you imagine bringing a Large Format Cambo or Toyo View camera to a wedding? Jeez, I'd go nuts composing all those bellows adjustments, focal planes, and adjusting my focus for just one shot. Digital SLR is where it's at. :D


http://www.michaeljsam​aripa.com (external link) creating beautiful images for myself, my clients, and the world. Shooting with a mix of Canon, Fuji, and Sony.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandro9mm
Goldmember
Avatar
1,718 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Italy, Milan
     
Apr 15, 2008 16:15 |  #4

I love my film toys so much :) especially in love with lomo

but yeah today, I kinda prefer the tone color depth of the film... but I can always imitate that feeling in photoshop


Photography Tips (external link) - Learn photography now!
Famous photographers (external link) - Video Interviews, photos, biography
My gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sjones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,261 posts
Likes: 249
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
     
Apr 16, 2008 00:11 as a reply to  @ sandro9mm's post |  #5

Digital photography is still at its infancy stage, and it will be interesting to see how it progresses over the next decade, let alone beyond that. Still, affordable digital systems, and I'll arbitrarily define that as up to US$3,000 (which is beyond my personal budget), are limited to DSLRs and compacts. It is questionable if certain systems, including the medium format Holga, the TLR, or large format, will ever make the digital conversion.

For the vast majority of photographers who only shoot digital, the loss of these systems as an option is likely inconsequential. However, I look forward to trying most of these cameras, as they each add a different approach to the photographic process, which to me is as important as 'getting the shot.' I can point an SLR at a stranger on the street, but it's a bit easier to do with a rangefinder. I would assume that using a square format 6X6 medium format would pose its own set of unique compositional considerations, and no, cropping precious resolution from a digital shot would not be the same.

To be sure, I'll be looking to see how digital quality advances, but a digital rangefinder that produces black & whites with the depth and resolution of its film counterpart and for, say, under US$1,200; probably not for some time.


May 2022-January 2023 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,482 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4578
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 16, 2008 00:11 |  #6

Unfortunately all comparisons done between digital and film dwell solely on resolution, and ignore other factors. This is like comparing MP3 files to analog records on the basis of frequency range only...and ignoring the fact that digital music on MP3 is horridly compressed. Similarly, film in larger (medium, large) formats has a range of tonality and color reproduction which is only approximated in the narrow dynamic range and 4096 levels of intensity in digital images.

OTOH, for noise free high ISO shots, nothing compares to digital!

Also B&W digital shots are laughable in quality, compared to silver halide prints!!!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

593 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Digital Vs film
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2769 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.