Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 17 Apr 2008 (Thursday) 08:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Over or under exposed photo's

 
ItzBitzHair
Senior Member
Avatar
405 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Ga/SC Boarder
     
Apr 17, 2008 08:16 |  #1

Is it better in a shooting situation to have your photo's a little over exposed and correct in pp or unders and lighten in pp. I ask this because i had a situation last night where I could not get the light right with out flash and ended up a little uex.. but the weekend end i ended up oex and i notice in correcting them the outcomes are different. which work better when it comes to quality in you guys opinion.

Thnx


www.haasports.info (external link) <- View my gallery !!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnEBongo
Senior Member
876 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 84
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
     
Apr 17, 2008 08:37 |  #2

It has been my understanding that it is better to underexpose. Over-exposing can lead to blown highlights and loss of detail which cannot be recovered. If you are underexposed, then typically the detail is still there and can be recovered in PP. Of course, I am no expert and this is a general observation and there are situations where I purposely over-expose my images.......




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Apr 17, 2008 08:40 |  #3

shoot RAW and always shoot to the right (overexposing by a tad). an underexposed picture will generally yield more noise -- even at low ISOs. a properly exposed high-ISO pic, has little or no discernable noise.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicmo
Senior Member
Avatar
413 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Hollister, Ca
     
Apr 17, 2008 08:47 |  #4

IMO I would rather be a tad over-exposed to see faces and eyes under helmets and hats, but not too far to the right with a ton of clipping.


--Aaron
Aaron Callanta Photography (external link)
SportsShooter Page (external link) | MaxPreps Profile (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tpanfil
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
12 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: So.California
     
Apr 17, 2008 10:16 |  #5

I would agree with the over exposed side. Under exposing and then brightening will add more noise. Noise hides in the dark recesses of your photo.


flickr page http://www.flickr.com/​photos/panfils/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nascarmaniac
Member
Avatar
146 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Apr 17, 2008 10:22 |  #6

For print, it is necessary for there to be a lot of detail in the mid-tones, and that can mean having to bump them about 1.25-1.5 in photoshop, which will yield a tonne of noise, so when Im out shooting, I make sure I overexpose with the in camera meter, as it is pretty inaccurate. You lose about a stop of light, maybe two when your images are printed on newsprint!


My Gear: 30D, 400D, 50mm 1.8, 10-22mm 3.5/5.6, 18-55 (kit lens), 70-200mm 4, 70-200 2.8, Speedlite 430EX, Speedlite 580EX, Grips for both, ST-E2 Transmitter.
Website (Covy Moore.com) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Webber
Goldmember
3,187 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Corralejo, Fuerteventura....Canary Islands Spain
     
Apr 18, 2008 06:08 |  #7

When I shoot surfing, I always underexpose by half a stop to avoid blowing out the white water, as this confuses the meter.

Thereafter, I correct in CS2


Canon 7D, 40D,100-400 IS L, EFS 15-85 IS, EFS 10-22-With Faulty USM, 055XPROB+488RC2, 430 & 580 II Flash, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8-:cool:
Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SportsOnFilm
Member
157 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Kannapolis, NC
     
Apr 18, 2008 06:19 |  #8

It is better to overexpose slightly than underexpose - check out the final note on Sports Illustrated's page of recommended settings for their photographers (this is the Mark II N page):

http://www.siphoto.com​/?canon1DM2N.inc (external link)


rian Westerholt (external link)
www.sportsonfilm.com (external link)
www.fourseamimages.com (external link)
2 - Mark IV bodies, 400/2.8 IS, 300/2.8 IS, 70-200, 28-70, 16-35, 15mm fisheye, 580 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Apr 18, 2008 08:32 |  #9

Over. While you can bring the detail back in underexposed images they will be full of noise.


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,835 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Over or under exposed photo's
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2808 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.