I'm having a terrible time deciding on my next prime.
I've pretty much narrowed it down to the Canon 100mm f/2 (Non-macro) or the EF-s 60mm Macro, but choosing which one is a pain.
Several things speak for the 60mm, it has a more suitable focal length, the possibility of shooting macro, and it's probably sharper too.
The 100mm is also very tempting though, with a wider aperture & faster focusing.
I'm not planning on going full frame, so that's no issue. Also as I'm not that much of a portrait-shooter, the longer focal length doesn't do that much harm. Oh well....
Which one would you get, and why?
Thanks for the input!