Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 19 Apr 2008 (Saturday) 12:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

24-70mm Vs. 24-105mm

 
JeanBaptiste
Member
Avatar
30 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: South London, Surrey
     
Apr 19, 2008 12:48 |  #1

I'm thinking of investing in some top quality glass to replace my kit lens (18-55mm). I'm considering either the 24-70 or 24-105. The latter seems more obvious since it is both cheaper and longer, however I've heard it can be slightly inconsistent at the long end concerning IQ. Would anyone who's had experience with both care to shed some light on the case, just with a few pros and cons of each?

Olivier


Olivier
Flickr: Photos from oliviert17 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Grentz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,874 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Midwest, USA
     
Apr 19, 2008 12:55 |  #2

Welcome to POTN!

This is THE most debated topic on this forum, search a bit and you will find more information than you could read in a lifetime. Some recent ones to look in:

https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105
https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=24-70+vs.+24-105


There is a lot of info on these 2, it just gets repeated a lot. So look in some of the threads and most of your questions should be answered. There is not one that is better than the other and both are a compromise over the other, that is what makes this debate so hard.


Search.TechIslands.com (external link) - Photography Shopping Search Engine

www.TechIslands.com (external link) - News and Reviews

My Gear List - 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,357 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 464
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 19, 2008 12:55 |  #3

Thank god someone finally asked this question.

Since you own the 18-55, I think the first question you need to ask yourself is if you ever use the range from 18mm to 23mm. Most people find they need that wide range on their main walkabout lens. If that is you, then you should be looking at the better lenses that cover the 17mm to XXmm range like the EF-S 17-55, Tamron 17-50 etc.

If you are one of the people who can live with 24mm and up, then the salient differences are that the 24-70 is 1 stop faster, 35mm shorter and 50% heavier. The biggest IQ issue of the 24-105 is poor corners at 24mm which does not affect a 1.6X body.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
terriyaki
Senior Member
Avatar
528 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Apr 19, 2008 12:56 |  #4

What do you like to shoot? What types of shooting conditions do you think you'll find yourself most in?

I'd also seriously consider adding the 17-55/2.8 IS to your short list of lenses to get as well.


X100S | 5D | 35 | 85 | 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elChivo
Member
Avatar
102 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Munich, Germany
     
Apr 19, 2008 12:56 |  #5

Search ftw:

https://photography-on-the.net …ight=24-70mm+Vs.+24-105mm

https://photography-on-the.net …ight=24-70mm+Vs.+24-105mm

https://photography-on-the.net …ight=24-70mm+Vs.+24-105mm

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=304681

and many more I guess


1D Mark III // 70-200 f/2.8 L IS // 17-40 f/4 L // 50 f/1.4 // Speedlite 580EX II
My
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeanBaptiste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
30 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: South London, Surrey
     
Apr 19, 2008 13:06 |  #6

Sorry guys, didn't realise quite how debated this topic was :oops:
As you say it's down to shooting style and user preferences. Thanks for the links, I'd better start reading.


Olivier
Flickr: Photos from oliviert17 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,773 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 319
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Apr 19, 2008 16:29 |  #7

Get both as i did to stop my inner debating ;-)a


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deadpass
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: phoenix, az
     
Apr 19, 2008 16:33 |  #8

Tareq wrote in post #5362908 (external link)
Get both as i did to stop my inner debating ;-)a

that's the best way to do it really.


a camera
http://www.deadpass.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johncloo
Member
55 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
     
Apr 19, 2008 19:20 |  #9

Tareq wrote in post #5362908 (external link)
Get both as i did to stop my inner debating ;-)a

That is my next step as well. Though I will admit that the 24-70 has yet to be removed from my 20d since I bought it. It has been a great lens. I spent weeks reading other posts here about the two lenses, and it finally came down to visiting my local store where they let me try them both on my camera. Bought it right on the spot. Good luck with your decision!


John
Canon EOS 40D, Rebel XT, G12, 100HS
EF 24-70 f/2.8 L SOLD
EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS, EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
Speedlite 580EXhttp:// …

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Orlandoech
Senior Member
Avatar
667 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
     
Apr 19, 2008 19:21 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

I would never chose an f/4 lens over an f/2.8 even if it did have IS. But thats just me.


Orlandoech Automotive Photography - www.Orlandoech.com (external link) - My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The_Camera_Poser
Goldmember
3,012 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
     
Apr 19, 2008 19:39 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

what do you like to shoot?

I just looked at your Flickr- I'd DEFINITELY go for the 24-70- you have a lot of shallow depth-of-field shots and action shots- the 24-70 is better for those IMHO. I adore my 24-105 and would never trade it for a 24-70/2.8, but I am 90% a landscape photographer and therefore don't need f/2.8, but do need IS.

A possible compromise is to go for the 24-105 AND either a Sigma 30/1.4 EX or a Tamron 17-50/2.8, which will be roughly the same price and weight as a 24-70 on it's own.

Cheers




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeanBaptiste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
30 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: South London, Surrey
     
Apr 19, 2008 20:07 |  #12

TBH there's no real thing I tend to shoot, although the speed and bokeh that the 24-70 offers is probably more my style. As you can see I often shoot wide open, so it looks like the 24-70 is the more obvious choice.

Thanks for taking the time to help me guys.

Olivier


Olivier
Flickr: Photos from oliviert17 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cathpah
Goldmember
Avatar
4,259 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Maine.
     
Apr 19, 2008 20:11 |  #13

I would say your biggest concern shouldn't be inconsistencies in one particular lens....but rather whether or not you want/need the 2.8 aperture. I know I do. it all depends on your shooting subject and style. shooting low light? wanting to blur out the background? etc.

read the other threads and you'll get the idea. way back when, i bought a 24-105. Eventually swapped it for a 24-70 and it was the best move I ever made.


Architecture (external link) | Fashion + Beauty (external link) | Travel (external link) | Mayhem (external link) | Instagram (external link)
tools of the trade
My name is Jeff, and I'm addicted to shadows in fashion and brights in architecture. "Hiiiiii Jeff."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monokrome
Goldmember
Avatar
1,185 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NoVa
     
Apr 19, 2008 20:11 |  #14

Tareq wrote in post #5362908 (external link)
Get both as i did to stop my inner debating ;-)a

I did, now I keep thinking which one I want to get rid of the fund a 24L. :confused:



S5IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Apr 19, 2008 20:17 |  #15

I kinda hate to bring this up in an "L" thread... but for wayyy cheaper you can get a Sigma 24-60 or 24-70 f/2.8, which have excellent quality at a fraction of the price (24-60 is going for $220 on amazon... THE best value for a f2.8 lens for sure!).

That being said, I'd love to have a 24-105 for my outdoor shooting. I really enjoyed the range of my 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS but wanted better sharper pics.

I can't justify the 17-55 IS being worth $1000 when it's built quality is the same or lower then my Sigma EX lens.


I need a FF, ya think??


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,139 views & 0 likes for this thread
24-70mm Vs. 24-105mm
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is deepdhimanphotography
785 guests, 291 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.