amfoto1 wrote in post #5674591
Look at it this way. If you were seeking a job and found one that paid $100 an hour while practically identical work at another job paid $1 an hour, would you just blow off an interview with the better paying one to only talk to the low paying employer? You may not get the high paid position, but isn't it worth a shot, before just "settling" for the low paying job?
Look at it this way. If you were seeking a job and found one that paid $100 an hour while practically identical work at another job paid $1 an hour, would you just blow off an interview with the better paying one to only talk to the low paying employer? You may not get the high paid position, but isn't it worth a shot, before just "settling" for the low paying job?
Good point, and I completely understand, I just don`t think that my images are good enough for macro stock, so I settled for micro.
Plus stock is on my life priorities on the very good 6th place, after family and friends, taking pictures of my newborn baby and two jobs that I`m currently doing... basically I don`t really expect to much from them, especially since they introduced subscriptions and they are paying really really peanuts...
