Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Nov 2004 (Thursday) 10:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is this really a front focusing problem?

 
lmelendez
Senior Member
815 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 25, 2004 10:34 |  #1

Hi guys,
I need some help over here. I bought a digital rebel a few weeks ago. I was taken lots of pictures and life was good. Then, I tried to take some portraits and noticed that they always were blurred.

I decided to do a little test putting Lego people and trying to take a picture, focusing on the lady that is right in the middle (red hair). I didn't try to use manual focus (since my understanding is that the front focusing problem only occurs with autofocus... but please let me know if I'm wrong!)

These are the results:

1. Using a Canon 50mm f1.8 II on a tripod and using the timer to avoid camera shake:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


2. Using the EFS lens that came with the Digital Rebel on a tripod and using the timer to avoid camera shake:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


When I showed the pictures to the guy in the store where I bought the camera (the phography expert), he said that autofocus was very inaccurate and with 1.8 I should be focusing manually always. I didn't like the answer but I couldn't argue since I'm not an expert.

So, if you want to give me a hand... these are my questions:

1. The lady in the middle is NOT on focus. Do you think it is a problem with the camera?

2. Is it true that the autofocus is inaccurate when you use a large apperture like 1.8 or 2.5???

3. I read in another post that the camera can be calibrated. Anybody in Canada has an idea how much time that takes? I have to send the camera to Montreal and they told me that Canon will keep it for two months... :(

Any help will be greatly appreciated. If you can add your own tests, maybe I will be able to compare them and agree with the guy with the store or at least show them that only my DRebel has a problem :shock:

Thanks in advance everybody!!!

[/B]

http://www.bluejaygall​ery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chops
Senior Member
Avatar
327 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Lakeland, FL
     
Nov 25, 2004 10:42 |  #2

Well, neither one of those pictures look focused on the lady LEGO.

As far as the guy telling about the autofocus not being accurate, he is just plain stupid for even thinking about saying that to someone. I suggest you find another camera shop to go to with knowledgable people.


Canon 10D w/ BG-ED3 Grip
Canon EF 50mm F1.8 Mk II
Canon EF 28-105 F3.5-4.5 Mk II
SanDisk 2GB Ultra II & Extreme III
http://charlest.zenfol​io.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lmelendez
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
815 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 25, 2004 10:47 |  #3

chops wrote:
Well, neither one of those pictures look focused on the lady LEGO.

Yeap, I know.... when he told me that about the autofocusing, I sent an email to Canon Canada to see what they think about this "authorized dealer" ?!


http://www.bluejaygall​ery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Nov 25, 2004 10:49 |  #4

Hi Imelendez,

nice group photo you have there...

some ideas ...

lmelendez wrote:
I didn't try to use manual focus (since my understanding is that the front focusing problem only occurs with autofocus... but please let me know if I'm wrong!)

Well, if your eyes are off, the problems would also occur with manual focus :lol:

When I showed the pictures to the guy in the store where I bought the camera (the phography expert), he said that autofocus was very inaccurate and with 1.8 I should be focusing manually always. I didn't like the answer but I couldn't argue since I'm not an expert.

I am not an expert either, but this sounds like total BS to me.

The camera has a very shallow depth-of-field (that means the part of the picture that is sharp and in focus as opposed to the parts of the image that are blurred) at 1.8. However, there are the 50/1.4 and 85/1.2 lenses that are used with very good results on the 10D and DRebel. To tell you that you always should focus manually is simply wrong.

1. The lady in the middle is NOT on focus. Do you think it is a problem with the camera?

To tell that, you must be sure that the camera really focused on the lady, and not on something else. You really can't tell where the camera focused. The only way you can assure that the camera focused exactly where the lady was standing would be to use some kind of isolated target at the same distance. Put up a vertical cardboard piece with a black line pattern that you can use for focusing exactly above the lady and focus on that.

2. Is it true that the autofocus is inaccurate when you use a large apperture like 1.8 or 2.5???

No, but the DOF is very shallow, so that you'll see easier if the AF is off. The AF will be inaccurate, if there is too much light available. Actually, the 50/1.8 lens will focus better than the 18-55 lens, because it lets in more light.

Hope that helps a bit.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Nov 25, 2004 10:54 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

What settings were you using? A small Av could have led to the first bad pic. Different values and AF points can lead to those results. Or was everything manual?


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lmelendez
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
815 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 25, 2004 11:04 |  #6

Thanks for the answers guys...

Andythaler, I'll do the test that you suggest. But the part that makes me sad is that I'm pretty sure that It was focusing on the lady...but when I saw the pictures in the computer, was always blurred (please note that I need several tests with different settings, but at f1.8 had the worse results)

Hellashot wrote:
What settings were you using? A small Av could have led to the first bad pic. Different values and AF points can lead to those results. Or was everything manual?

I had the camera in av, f1.8 and 1/2 secs (I think). AF Point was right in the middle, and the red dot was right in the middle of the "red hair" lady.


http://www.bluejaygall​ery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Nov 25, 2004 11:22 |  #7

lmelendez wrote:
I had the camera in av, f1.8 and 1/2 secs (I think). AF Point was right in the middle, and the red dot was right in the middle of the "red hair" lady.

2 things ...

... select a higher ISO (e.g. 800 or 1600) in order to get a faster shutter speed (at least 1/50) . Even on a tripod, camera shake can not be ruled out. Turn on all the lamps you can mobilize to help the camera focusing.

... you should be aware that the area the camera actually uses for focusing is larger than the red dot that is displayed.
The dot is in the middle of the focus area, but the actual area might cover more of the figures.

Given your preference for LEGO, I'd suggest you create the focusing pattern by putting 2 blocks (4x2) side-by-side and creating something like a cross:

white black
white black
white black
black white
black white
black white
......xx
......xx
......xx
......xx
......xx


The xx block stands for the stand, but I think you get the picture :lol:

Put it to the side of the lady so the front of it is in one pane with her face. It should also be away from the figures so you only focus on it.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lmelendez
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
815 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 25, 2004 11:28 |  #8

Andythaler wrote:
... you should be aware that the area the camera actually uses for focusing is larger than the red dot that is displayed.
The dot is in the middle of the focus area, but the actual area might cover more of the figures.

Given your preference for LEGO, I'd suggest you create the focusing pattern by putting 2 blocks (4x2) side-by-side and creating something like a cross

Interesting... I'll do that as soon as I get home and give it a try. I repeated the same group picture with another Rebel in the store and the results were a bit better... but still, I just want to make sure that if I send the camera to Canon (and wait 2 month)... it will be because something is indeed wrong.


http://www.bluejaygall​ery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wolf
Senior Member
Avatar
738 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Alberta Canada
     
Nov 25, 2004 12:44 |  #9

lmelendez wrote:
Thanks for the answers guys...

Andythaler, I'll do the test that you suggest. But the part that makes me sad is that I'm pretty sure that It was focusing on the lady...but when I saw the pictures in the computer, was always blurred (please note that I need several tests with different settings, but at f1.8 had the worse results)

Hellashot wrote:
What settings were you using? A small Av could have led to the first bad pic. Different values and AF points can lead to those results. Or was everything manual?

I had the camera in av, f1.8 and 1/2 secs (I think). AF Point was right in the middle, and the red dot was right in the middle of the "red hair" lady.

I find that sometime when trying to focus on a smooth and shiny object at close range the AF sensor gets fooled into thinking the focus is dead on and in reality it is not.

I shoot a lot of product shots for a stock photo agency and the way I do it when having a focusing issue is hold a small feather against the shiny object and focus on it. Then move the feather and shot. I also use only the middle AF sensor.



<> My Gear <>

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
commando
Senior Member
282 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Nov 25, 2004 12:55 |  #10

Personally i'd try a smaller aperature, as it partially looks like a depth of field problem. Parts of the photo are focussed ok, but it looks like a narrow DOF. F8 might be worth a go. Try on auto and manual focus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Nov 26, 2004 01:52 |  #11

commando wrote:
Personally i'd try a smaller aperature, as it partially looks like a depth of field problem.

Well, the whole point of the exercise is to use as large an aperture as possible to see whether the camera focuses correctly :wink:
Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Nov 28, 2004 13:24 |  #12

Hey imelendez,

we want to see the Lego people again :lol:

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lmelendez
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
815 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 28, 2004 15:02 |  #13

Hi Andythaler...
I've been really busy at work :( and haven't had the time to set up the test. If I'm lucky, the next day or two I'll have sometime to keep testing. And just as an update, Canon Canada sent me an email saying that they are not aware of any issues with autofocus :wink:

I sent them an email after the "expert" at the camera shop told me that the camera cannot focus when the apperture is 1.8 :shock:

Anyway, I'll post the results soon!!!

Thanks for the help

Leo.


http://www.bluejaygall​ery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lmelendez
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
815 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 29, 2004 18:17 |  #14

Hi again,
So I finally had the chance to do the test that Andythaler suggested me (well, sort of... my daughters let me used all the figures this time :lol:)

All tests were done using a Canon 50mm f1.8, with the lego and the camera on top of a table, using the timer to avoid camera shake. Lego blocks were aprox 30cms from the camera.

1. f1.8 1/13 s (800x600)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


If you ask me (not a professional eye of course), the black/white blocks in the middle were not in focus, the yellow/red ones on its left are.

1. f5.6 0.6 s (800x600)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


This time, I think the black/white blocks are in focus... and now I'm even more confused... since I was expecting the front focusing problem to be present all the time (however, it would be more evident at larger appertures).

I found a document from Canon that explains a bit how the focusing should work and has some tips to test the camera. In the same document, they indicate that the camera and/or the lens can be calibrated. I might end up sending my DRebel for calibration, just don't want to do it now because I want to use my "new toy" during the holidays.

Any comments? suggestions?

http://www.bluejaygall​ery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Nov 30, 2004 01:30 |  #15

Hi Imelendez,

Maybe my first post was not clear enough. ?!

If you want to be sure where the camera focuses, you should make a focusing target that is in a different place from the objects you want to check for sharpness.
Also, you might try to introduct both horizontal and vertical lines in the focusing target.

TARGET
TARGET ...< - Focus on this area here
TARGET
TARGET ...............Test the results below
TARGET ............... VV
....I
....I...............o.​...........o..........​...o............o.....​......o
....I...............o.​...........o..........​...o............o.....​......o
....I...............o.​...........o..........​...o............o.....​......o
....I...............o.​...........o..........​...o............o.....​......o
....I...............o.​...........o..........​...o............o.....​......o
....I...............o.​...........o..........​...o............o.....​......o


Also, you might use objects that have a little more detail where you could judge the sharpness ... the little people were fine for that.

One last thing ... 30 cm is really close to the camera. What is the minimal focus distance of the 1.8/50 lens? I would put the camera further away from the target. This will also allow you to judge the focus better, as the DOF will be even shallower on f/1.8

Besides, I like them :wink:

Hope this helps.....

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,964 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Is this really a front focusing problem?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2000 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.