I'm finally picking up the new cam next week and need some advice. I'm not really sure I'll even grab the kit but if I do which lens would you chose?
| POLL: "Which Kit Lens would you chose for the 40D?" |
Canon 28-135 IS USM | 24 23.8% |
Canon 17-85 IS USM | 35 34.7% |
They're both mediocre, save your money for better glass. | 42 41.6% |
SlowBlink "I like dog butts" 1,926 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver B.C. More info | Apr 24, 2008 17:45 | #1 I'm finally picking up the new cam next week and need some advice. I'm not really sure I'll even grab the kit but if I do which lens would you chose? Rob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kruzkal Senior Member 393 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Apr 24, 2008 17:52 | #2 Depending on budget I would say one of these:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SlowBlink THREAD STARTER "I like dog butts" 1,926 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver B.C. More info | Apr 24, 2008 18:00 | #3 I haven't see any kits with the new 18-55 model. I haven't seen any comparisons with the two kits lenses and the old 18-55 either. Most reviews are iffy about the kits lenses but if they're better than the old 18-55's that's not really a bad deal. With the kit it's cheaper plus the rebate brings it down another hundred. Rob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kruzkal Senior Member 393 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Apr 24, 2008 18:06 | #4 The IS version of the kit lens gets raving reviews. In fact every review puts its IQ above the 17-85. e.g. http://www.photozone.de …56-is-test-report--review
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mkohman Senior Member 742 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: London More info | Apr 24, 2008 18:06 | #5 Scrap the kit Lens.. GEAR: Canon 5D MKII | C[COLOR=black]anon 50mm f/1.4 | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L | Canon 580EX II Flash.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Riktar Member 123 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Neosho, WI More info | If you do not have plans to go to a 5D (Or higher) body anytime soon I would go with the 17-55mm f2.8 IS lens. Canon gear - 7D, 50mm f/1.8 II, 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, 15-85mm IS, Nissin Di866 flash.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bacchanal Cream of the Crop 5,284 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Fort Wayne, IN More info |
JimG I feel thoroughly satisfied 12,255 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Australia. More info | Apr 24, 2008 18:15 | #8 I had the 17-85, was unimpressed after twelve months, sold for a 24-70. 24mm isn't wide enough if it's your main lens... the 17-55 IS looks pretty darned good. Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios.com.au
LOG IN TO REPLY |
new_user Member 138 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: East of SF bay More info | Looking at the list of lenses you already have, I would just get the body. New to XTI Jan-2008
LOG IN TO REPLY |
westernminnguy Goldmember 2,079 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Western Minnesota More info | I've been shooting my 40D with my lenses and have really been impressed with the results....see gear list.
IMAGES
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pitimpinai Member 94 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Apr 24, 2008 19:07 | #12 Don't get a kit lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SlowBlink THREAD STARTER "I like dog butts" 1,926 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver B.C. More info | Apr 24, 2008 19:21 | #13 Thanks guys. I'm leaning heavily on body only but the urge to get the kit and resell the lens is an option too. The first lens I'm buying after is the 50 1.4 or 1.8 depending on deals. My Tokina and Fifty can handle my street and landscape until I grab a 17-40L. The Tamron will go on CL as soon as I get a 70-200 and a decent TC. Rob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
westernminnguy Goldmember 2,079 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Western Minnesota More info | Apr 24, 2008 19:28 | #14 SlowBlink wrote in post #5397831 Thanks guys. I'm leaning heavily on body only but the urge to get the kit and resell the lens is an option too. The 17-55 is tempting for street though.... Slow, IMAGES
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Apr 24, 2008 19:40 | #15 westernminnguy wrote in post #5397890 Slow, You will hear all kinds of I bought the 28 - 135 for $200 and sold it for twice that....threads......be careful there. I've had one of those lenses....they don't sell for that much...new or used. for the $190 price difference...it seems that it would be easy to sell it for over $300...and if not...you must've done something wrong Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1597 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||