Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 25 Apr 2008 (Friday) 07:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Gymnastics Advice for new DSLR

 
kml
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Apr 26, 2008 10:12 as a reply to  @ post 5407338 |  #16

Thanks so much for all the advice!

I went to my daughter's practice last night where I played around some. I was in manual mode :
iso: 1600
shutter speed: 1/400
Metering Mode : centerweighted
AF Mode : AI Servo AF
Av : tried to set at 3.5, but would change when I played with the lens.

So, then I switched over to Av priority and got some better results. It was dark out and they only had every other light on. I noticed that in Av priority, the shutter speeds were slower so that was what helped the brightness.

I think I may invest at first in the 85mm f1.8.

I'll play around at the meet tonight and see what I get.

I've seen people mention that you can rent lens . . . how do you find out in your local area who does?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 26, 2008 12:46 |  #17

kml wrote in post #5407782 (external link)
Thanks so much for all the advice!

I went to my daughter's practice last night where I played around some. I was in manual mode :
iso: 1600
shutter speed: 1/400
Metering Mode : centerweighted
AF Mode : AI Servo AF
Av : tried to set at 3.5, but would change when I played with the lens.

The reason you could not stay at f/3.5 is that your zoom lens is variable aperture. It can only be down to f/3.5 at the wide end of the zoom. As you use the longer end of the zoom range it will slow down to f/5.6 at best.

More importantly, what was the histogram looking like? You set the shutter speed and ISO like I would, but you also have a slow lens. My guess is that you were underexposing the shots with those settings (histogram bunched to the left, pictures appear dark). This tells you that you either have to compromise on shutter speed (leads to blur) or get a faster lens.

So, then I switched over to Av priority and got some better results. It was dark out and they only had every other light on. I noticed that in Av priority, the shutter speeds were slower so that was what helped the brightness.

Right. The camera meter was making the compromise I mentioned above, sacrificing shutter speed to keep the shot from being very underexposed. You can do the same in M mode and still keep control of the exposure.

I think I may invest at first in the 85mm f1.8.

This will almost certainly help.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shooting
Goldmember
Avatar
1,552 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2008
     
Apr 26, 2008 17:49 as a reply to  @ post 5407338 |  #18

I used to be a staff photographer for a gymnastics magazine in the early 80's. ISO 1600 is too much unless you are going to use a 2.8 opening. I don't like shooting wide open..if your focus is a little off then you have lost all depth of field and the entire image is gone..I shot ISO 800 f/4 at 1/250 and made the cover at least once and published several times..yes I used film but since digital is more sensitive than film 1600 is too much.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fishingjts
Senior Member
Avatar
984 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
Apr 26, 2008 18:19 |  #19

Shooting wrote in post #5409618 (external link)
I used to be a staff photographer for a gymnastics magazine in the early 80's. ISO 1600 is too much unless you are going to use a 2.8 opening. I don't like shooting wide open..if your focus is a little off then you have lost all depth of field and the entire image is gone..I shot ISO 800 f/4 at 1/250 and made the cover at least once and published several times..yes I used film but since digital is more sensitive than film 1600 is too much.

What level of gymnastics? All the little gyms I've ever shot at it would be ISO 1600, f2.8 and 1/250! I have shot a couple of college level meets and the arena had much better lighting than the ones I was used to... LOL! But when it comes to the little kids, they seem to compete in caves! LOL


5D Mark II Gripped | 24-105L | 70-200L F2.8 IS II | 430EX | G16

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mspringfield
Senior Member
Avatar
869 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
     
Apr 26, 2008 18:32 |  #20

Kim,

The ultimate lens for gymnastics is the 200mm F1.8 but unfortunately it will be way out of your price range at $4000+ but if your daughter ends up advancing then put it on your wish list. Beyond that I would recommend a 135 F2 that can be found for a little over $800 on the used market if you look around. In the $500 or less range I would go with the 100 F2. It will give you a little more reach than the 85 1.8. I have used it successfully in gymnastics for years.

Enjoy your shooting.
Michael


Michael Springfield - Chattanooga, TN
Canon 1DsMkIII, Canon EOS M, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS, Canon EF 1.4x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Apr 26, 2008 19:23 |  #21

Shooting wrote in post #5409618 (external link)
I used to be a staff photographer for a gymnastics magazine in the early 80's. ISO 1600 is too much unless you are going to use a 2.8 opening. I don't like shooting wide open..if your focus is a little off then you have lost all depth of field and the entire image is gone..I shot ISO 800 f/4 at 1/250 and made the cover at least once and published several times..yes I used film but since digital is more sensitive than film 1600 is too much.

Ummmm.....yes the lighting is nice at the Olympics.

Have you ever shot in the kinds of gyms where little kids compete?

ISO 3200, f/2 and 1/320 is not out of the norm. I consider ISO1600, f/2 and /400 to be a very bright gym.

Your settings (ISO800, f/4 and 1/250) are a little over 2 stops brighter than any youth gym I have been in. Those settings may work OK for college and Olympic level events but for your basic 12 year old girls they are fantastically optimistic.

I can also usually see noticeable motion blur at 1/250.

ISO 1600 is too much unless you are going to use a 2.8 opening. I don't like shooting wide open

Also, this comment does not make sense to me. Why is ISO 1600 "too much" if you don't like to shoot wide open? If you prefer to shoot at ISO800 (as you stated) then 1600 will let you stop down one full stop more on the lens for greater DOF.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,485 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Gymnastics Advice for new DSLR
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2663 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.