Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 30 Apr 2008 (Wednesday) 05:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which would be best?

 
DSLRMan
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Apr 2008
     
Apr 30, 2008 05:25 |  #1

Hi, Hope someone will be kind enough answer this question for me.

I am looking at buying a Pro Spec Canon camera which would be used for Portrait/Wedding, Landsape, Wildlife and Sports photography. Which of these camera's would be the best all round option 5D, 1D MarkIII or 1DS MarkIII.

Thanks in advance
DSLRMan




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ICee
Senior Member
Avatar
494 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 192
Joined May 2006
Location: Newcastle upon tyne uk
     
Apr 30, 2008 06:44 |  #2

Out of your three options I would say the 1DmkIII.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nickOH
Member
74 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Apr 30, 2008 06:52 |  #3

I would go for the 5D and a more well rounded lens lineup, which can be bought with the cash saved instead of buying the 1DmkIII.


Isn't it funny how my kit isn't listed here?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Dot
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Trapped Inside the Penta-prism
     
Apr 30, 2008 06:55 |  #4

i'd say 5D or even the awaited mK II if you can wait.


I tried to write my signature, but my pen ran out and I put a big scratch on my monitor

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Apr 30, 2008 07:07 |  #5

For about the price of a 1DsIII, you could have 2 x 5D for weddings/portraits + 1 x 1DIII for sports/wildlife. Then spend as much on lenses, tripods, and lighting, and you'd be set - call it $16k all up.

P.S.
Oh - where are my manners?!?
Welcome to POTN!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nadtz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Apr 30, 2008 11:19 |  #6

What are you currently using and how well is or isn't it meeting your needs?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Apr 30, 2008 11:48 |  #7

I’d go for the 1D MkIII and the 5D and skip the 1Ds. Your gonna want two bodies anyway.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elader
Goldmember
Avatar
2,374 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Apr 30, 2008 17:53 |  #8

well you need two of everything so I would say 2 x 5D, 2X 580EX, 16-35, 24-80, 70-200 f/2.8IS

$9000 to start.


Eric
FJR1300 rider
5D mkIII and 1D MkIII

16-35L | 24-105L | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 85 f/1.8 / 50 f.1,4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Apr 30, 2008 21:04 |  #9

I suggest you take a really good look at the 1D3. If someone says that it is not a good choice for any of your needs just keep in mind that a lot of pros in all those areas have used and do use Nikons which have smaller and not as advanced sensors as the 1D3.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JasonW
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
     
Apr 30, 2008 21:37 |  #10

The "best" camera in my view would the 1DSMkIII. It is full frame, 21MP, has the same AF as the 1DMkIII, and can shoot at 5 frames per second. I would then look at the 1DMkIII and then the 5D. This obviously assumes an unlimited budget. I suspect that you budget is limited (allthough I could be wrong) which means that you need to consider the cost of the camera vs. its performance. In this case you wpuld probably be better off with either the 5D or 1DMkIII plus glass depending on your budget.

All three cameras are capable of taking very high quality shots....


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sfaust
Goldmember
Avatar
2,306 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2006
     
Apr 30, 2008 22:22 |  #11

The 5D is a perfect wedding camera. High quality, excellent high ISO performance, enough MP to do anything you need, light weight enough to carry around all weekend long.

A 1DsMkII or MkIII is overkill in the MP department. More computer processing power required for editing, more storage needed for image storage and archives, etc. And to boot, its heavy to carry around all weekend with a L lens on it compares to the 5D, and at a substantial price in increase.

I am a firm believer to get the right tool for the job. A 1DsMkIII is a very nice camera, but a 5D is better matched for a wedding and event camera. And with the savings, you can better outfit your lighting, lenses, wireless, and computer.


Stephen

Mix of digital still gear, Medium format to M4/3.
Canon EOS Cinema for video.
Commercial Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Apr 30, 2008 23:03 |  #12

jr_senator wrote in post #5437581 (external link)
I suggest you take a really good look at the 1D3. If someone says that it is not a good choice for any of your needs just keep in mind that a lot of pros in all those areas have used and do use Nikons which have smaller and not as advanced sensors as the 1D3.

i actually think the d3 would be great for all the things listed, were it not for the price tag and the fact it's only 6mp in dx mode... and nikon lenses are generally 10-20% more expensive for the same thing. 1dmkiii is great though, it'll take care of wildlife and sports pretty well, but 5d+40d is more affordable, and you'll be able to make the most out of each lens purchase (17-40 on 5d is a great wide angle and really goo walkaround length on a 40d, 70-200 is great for portraits on a 5d and awesome for wildlife and sports on 40d, etc)


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcmadkat
Goldmember
Avatar
1,059 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Scotland
     
May 01, 2008 06:18 |  #13

I think you should get a 450D XSi

or 1D MIII



30D 17-40L 580EXII
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=386249

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
May 01, 2008 10:45 |  #14

basroil wrote in post #5438174 (external link)
...5d+40d is more affordable, and you'll be able to make the most out of each lens purchase...

Certainly worth a look at. As for myself, at this age, condition and non-pro requirements, I'm not wanting to haul around more than one DSLR. In my younger days I routinely carried three 35mm SLRs and a bag of lenses, etc. Maybe if I were willing to carry two DSLRs I would seriously consider your suggestion. I will say this, I found my 20D very uncomfortable without a BG. How much putting BGs on the 5D and 40D would add to weight and cost may be a consideration for some.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 01, 2008 10:48 |  #15

If I could only choose one, 1dsmk3 will satisfy all the requirements. 5d wouln't be good for sports/wildlife. 1dsmk3 gives you higher pixel density of 1.6x crop cameras for sports/wildlife use and at same time fills the need of wedding/portait with better AF and faster fps than 5d.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,433 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Which would be best?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2767 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.