I have more from this series if anyone's interested.
Epix Senior Member 507 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Apr 30, 2008 22:28 | #1 I have more from this series if anyone's interested. Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
coalcliff Goldmember 3,521 posts Likes: 17 Joined Sep 2007 Location: On the coast, near Sydney, Australia More info | Apr 30, 2008 22:39 | #2 If you embed the image in your post you will get more replies My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | I love this photo.everything about it is perfect.except the processing...I just find it Too grainy.....but the pose is fabulous. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 01, 2008 09:58 | #4 I love this photo.everything about it is perfect.except the processing...I just find it Too grainy.....but the pose is fabulous. Yeah, for some reason it posted that way. I think it's because I had to heavily compress it in order to be able to post it. It doesn't look like that on my computer. Thanks for the comments! Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonydee Goldmember 2,009 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Tokyo More info | May 01, 2008 10:32 | #5 Hi Rick. I'm not a fan of blown highlights, but there's enough in the picture to keep attention away from them for a good while 5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Meaty0 Goldmember 3,519 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane, Australia More info | May 02, 2008 00:34 | #6 I love this photo Rick. Funny, because I think Mom has just enough "defocus" to make it look right and for some reason the blown highlights work. I find the tree trunk a bit distracting, but removing it may spoil the image.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WalczakPhoto Goldmember 1,034 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | I think it's because I had to heavily compress it in order to be able to post it. If you watch your DPI versus your image size when you're resizing an image, chances are you won't need to add so much compression. If the image is of reasonable size to begin with (4-5 megapixels or higher) and you resize to 72 dpi with 800 pixels as your longest side, usually you can save your jpegs at medium or even high without too much loss of quality. "It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeuceDeuce Goldmember 2,362 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver BC, Canada More info | May 02, 2008 17:09 | #8 Walczak Photo wrote in post #5449327 If you watch your DPI versus your image size when you're resizing an image, chances are you won't need to add so much compression. If the image is of reasonable size to begin with (4-5 megapixels or higher) and you resize to 72 dpi with 800 pixels as your longest side, usually you can save your jpegs at medium or even high without too much loss of quality. Just a suggestion, Peace, Jim If you resize to 800 pixels on the long side it doesn't matter what the DPI is. DPI is only used in combination with total pixels to determine final print size. my website: Light & Shadow
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 07, 2008 10:53 | #9 Got the prints back from the lab for this series and they look great! I think the family is going to be very pleased. Thanks for the responses! Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2602 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||