Definitely #2 for me, but I like the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 idea.
| POLL: "Best Possible Combination for $1000" |
Tamron 17-50 + Sigma 18-200 OS + 430 EX - ~$1125 | 2 1.9% |
Tamron 17-50 + Canon55-250 IS + 430 EX - ~ $950 | 59 54.6% |
Sigma 18-125 OS HSM (New) + Sigma 10-20 + 430 EX - ~$830 | 9 8.3% |
Canon 24-105 L - ~$1050 | 38 35.2% |
PerryGe Batteries? We don't need no... . . . or cards. More info | May 01, 2008 13:25 | #16 Definitely #2 for me, but I like the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 idea. Perry | www.perryge.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hastur Member 167 posts Joined Jul 2007 More info | May 01, 2008 13:33 | #17 That sounds good to me or the 17-50 Tamron + the 430EX and some goodies to round out your kit. How can you trust a man who wears both a belt and suspenders? The man can't even trust his own pants. - Frank (Henry Fonda) in Once Upon a Time in the West.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | May 01, 2008 13:38 | #18 A 24-105 and EF-S 10-22 is a great combination you can do a lot of general photography with on a crop camera. Get the 24-105 now and save for the 10-22, this pair are one of my favorite minimal kit combinations. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustBe Goldmember 1,449 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Seattle area More info | May 01, 2008 13:51 | #19 The lens is 1030 now on B&H after the increase. A good UV would put that at near 1100.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustBe Goldmember 1,449 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Seattle area More info | May 01, 2008 13:52 | #20 Lester Wareham wrote in post #5441399 A 24-105 and EF-S 10-22 is a great combination you can do a lot of general photography with on a crop camera. Get the 24-105 now and save for the 10-22, this pair are one of my favorite minimal kit combinations.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | May 01, 2008 14:11 | #21 Just Be wrote in post #5441466 The lens is 1030 now on B&H after the increase. A good UV would put that at near 1100. oh, i'll bet i can get both for $1000 http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustBe Goldmember 1,449 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Seattle area More info | May 01, 2008 14:20 | #22 Please tell us where, Ed? New?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
What I understood from the replies is 2nd Option is the best for the price but poll indicates option 4. Canon 5D III | Canon 24-70 L II | Canon 50D | Canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II | Sigma 17-50 OS | Canon 50mm f1.8 II | 580,430 EX II Speedlite
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | May 01, 2008 14:56 | #24 Just Be wrote in post #5441646 Please tell us where, Ed? New? The OP did say "new gear". I've never found a decent 77mm UV for under $80 that I would put over a nice lens like a 17-55 IS. what is your definition of decent? http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustBe Goldmember 1,449 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Seattle area More info | May 01, 2008 14:59 | #25 ed rader wrote in post #5441877 what is your definition of decent? you can get an excellent UV like a hoya pro for half that cost. ed rader Oh let's not argue about UV filters again. You know what I mean.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | May 01, 2008 15:01 | #26 Just Be wrote in post #5441895 Oh let's not argue about UV filters again. You know what I mean. I still want to know where you say you can buy a new 17-55 IS and a UV filter for $1000. I think the OP would be very interested in that option. i wouldn't buy a new one but when i find one for under $1000 i'll e-mail the OP....or are you his spokesman now http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustBe Goldmember 1,449 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Seattle area More info | May 01, 2008 15:12 | #27 ed rader wrote in post #5441915 i wouldn't buy a new one but when i find one for under $1000 i'll e-mail the OP....or are you his spokesman now ?BTW, there's no argument about UVs. many of us cut out the middleman and buy them right from the source. ed rader I can barely speak for myself let alone others.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | May 01, 2008 15:16 | #28 Just Be wrote in post #5441973 I can barely speak for myself let alone others. ![]() HVSTAR is a great source if you can wait a week to 10 days. You meant used. I get it. Actually buying used is the way to go on that lens. I did the same with my 24-105L. I recommend to the OP to look at "refurbished by Canon" lenses on Adorama or B&H. They are near new and recently brought to spec by Canon. the OP said new gear ... i took that to mean "new to him". http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelharmony Senior Member 857 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Chicago More info | May 01, 2008 15:17 | #29 I vote Sigma 24-60 ($220) + Canon 70-200 f4 ($500) + 430EX ($260) Eugene Kim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
could someone answer my question please: Canon 5D III | Canon 24-70 L II | Canon 50D | Canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II | Sigma 17-50 OS | Canon 50mm f1.8 II | 580,430 EX II Speedlite
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1534 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||